Nanosafety and Nanotoxicology: Current Opportunities and Challenges

A special issue of Nanomaterials (ISSN 2079-4991). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Nanoscience and Nanotechnology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 June 2024 | Viewed by 555

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: genotoxicity assays; cytotoxicity tests; DNA and chromosomal damage evaluation; comet assay; nanomaterial safety testing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Istituto Superiore Di Sanita, Rome, Italy
Interests: genotoxicity assays; cytotoxicity tests; DNA and chromosomal damage evaluation; comet assay; nanomaterial safety testing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The increasing use of nanomaterials in a wide range of consumer products arises from the need to define a correct strategy for hazard identification and risk assessment. In the last few years, a large amount of data on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity have been published and produced in a wide range of collaborative European-funded projects, but the key mechanisms involved in the cytotoxic and genotoxic responses of nanomaterials are still controversial. In addition, the assay conditions for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity testing are currently being questioned, especially in a regulatory context. In this framework, to facilitate the safe development and use of nanomaterials, the European Commission is supporting the revision/adaptation of the existing safety assessment methods as well as the validation of new approach methodologies and their integration into the risk assessment process (OECD Testing Guidelines and/or Guidance Documents).

This Special Issue is open to contributions on studies on the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nanomaterials regarding a) the conditions for cytotoxicity and genotoxicity testing, such as the cell line(s) to be used, the maximum dose/concentration, and the rationale for nanomaterial-positive controls; b) advanced biological models for in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity testing; c) Safe-and Sustainable by-Design (SSbD) approaches; d) in silico methodologies, like QSAR, grouping, and read-across; and e) criteria for the efficient reuse of existing nanosafety data, as recently established through the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) guiding principle.

Dr. Cristina Andreoli
Dr. Andrea Zijno
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Nanomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nanomaterial cytotoxicity testing
  • nanomaterial genotoxicity testing
  • nanosafety
  • new approach methodologies (NAMs)
  • safe and sustainable-by-design (SSbD) approaches
  • in silico methodologies
  • FAIR approach

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 4410 KiB  
Article
Toxicological Characteristics of Bacterial Nanocellulose in an In Vivo Experiment—Part 1: The Systemic Effects
by Vladimir A. Shipelin, Ekaterina A. Skiba, Vera V. Budayeva, Antonina A. Shumakova, Alexey I. Kolobanov, Ilya E. Sokolov, Kirill Z. Maisaya, Galina V. Guseva, Nikita V. Trusov, Alexander G. Masyutin, Yanina A. Delegan, Yulia N. Kocharovskaya, Alexander G. Bogun, Ivan V. Gmoshinski, Sergey A. Khotimchenko and Dmitry B. Nikityuk
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(9), 768; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano14090768 - 26 Apr 2024
Viewed by 343
Abstract
Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is being considered as a potential replacement for microcrystalline cellulose as a food additive and a source of dietary fiber due to its unique properties. However, studies on the risks of consuming BNC in food are limited, and it is [...] Read more.
Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is being considered as a potential replacement for microcrystalline cellulose as a food additive and a source of dietary fiber due to its unique properties. However, studies on the risks of consuming BNC in food are limited, and it is not yet approved for use in food in the US, EU, and Russia. Aim: This study aims to perform a toxicological and hygienic assessment of the safety of BNC in a subacute 8-week administration in rats. Methods: BNC was administered to male Wistar rats in doses of 0, 1.0, 10.0, and 100 mg/kg body weight for 8 weeks. Various parameters such as anxiety levels, cognitive function, organ masses, blood serum and liver biochemistry, oxidative stress markers, vitamin levels, antioxidant gene expression, and liver and kidney histology were evaluated. Results: Low and medium doses of BNC increased anxiety levels and liver glutathione, while high doses led to elevated LDL cholesterol, creatinine, and uric acid levels. Liver tissue showed signs of degeneration at high doses. BNC did not significantly affect vitamin levels. Conclusion: The adverse effects of BNC are either not dose-dependent or fall within normal physiological ranges. Any effects on rats are likely due to micronutrient deficiencies or impacts on intestinal microbiota. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanosafety and Nanotoxicology: Current Opportunities and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop