The Impact of Mulching on Crop Production and Farmland Environment

A special issue of Agronomy (ISSN 2073-4395). This special issue belongs to the section "Farming Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 1398

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Interests: plastic film mulching; plasticulture; microplastics; environmental impact assessment; life cycle assessment

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Agricultural Environment and Sustainable Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Interests: plastic film mulching; plasticulture; microplastics; water-saving agriculture; dryland agriculture

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
Interests: straw returning; carbon footprint; nitrogen management; nitrogen footprint; crop cultivation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Mulching is an important agricultural production measure that is beneficial for promoting crop yield, reducing water use efficiency, controlling weeds and pests, and preventing soil erosion. Various mulching materials (plastic film mulching, straw mulching, organic mulching, etc.) and mulching modes (furrow mulching, ridge mulching, etc.) have different impacts on crop production and the soil environment.

However, the inappropriate use of mulching, especially plastic film mulching, can lead to negative environmental impacts. Residual plastic film in the soil can damage its granular structure, reduce its permeability, and worsen its physical and chemical properties, directly affecting crop growth. Some plastic films degrade into microplastics or decompose into harmful substances, leading to the risk of polluting soil and water sources and damaging the agricultural ecological environment.

Therefore, this Special Issue seeks to publish related research on (1) the impacts of various mulching materials and modes on crop production, including but not limited to crop yield, water use efficiency, and nutrient recycling; and (2) the active and negative impacts of mulching on the farmland environment, including but not limited to greenhouse gas emissions, active nitrate leaching, ecosystem services, and microplastic pollution.

Dr. Jixiao Cui
Prof. Dr. Wen-Qing He
Dr. Yingxing Zhao
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Agronomy is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • plastic film mulching
  • straw mulching
  • soil surface mulching
  • organic mulching
  • microplastic
  • crop production
  • farmland environment
  • soil ecology

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 2042 KiB  
Communication
Comparative Analysis of Biodegradable Mulches on Soil Bacterial Community and Pepper Cultivation
by Tuo Jin, Lin Li, Kewei Peng, Wei Li, Decai Jin, Wu Chen and Jianwei Peng
Agronomy 2024, 14(5), 905; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy14050905 - 26 Apr 2024
Viewed by 306
Abstract
Biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) are becoming increasingly popular in agricultural practices. However, research on the ecological impact of biodegradable mulch films on pepper–soil systems is still scarce. To compare the differential effects of BMFs and polyethylene (PE) mulch on soil chemical properties, soil [...] Read more.
Biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) are becoming increasingly popular in agricultural practices. However, research on the ecological impact of biodegradable mulch films on pepper–soil systems is still scarce. To compare the differential effects of BMFs and polyethylene (PE) mulch on soil chemical properties, soil bacterial community composition, and pepper cultivation, a study was conducted encompassing eight distinct treatments. These treatments included three varieties of polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) combined with polylactic acid (PLA) mulches: PP-JL, PP-SD, and PP-SH; a black polypropylene carbonate mulch (PPC-BK); a brown PPC mulch (PPC-BR); a polyethylene (PE) mulch; straw mulching (NCK); and an uncovered control (PCK). After applying mulches for 129 days, most PPC and PBAT + PLA films had reached the rupture phase, whereas the PE film was still in the induction phase. Pepper yield was obviously higher in all mulched treatments (4830 kg hm−1) than in the un-mulched control (3290 kg hm−1), especially the BMF PP-JL treatment, which showed the most notable improvements in yield. Although BMF treatments maintained a lower soil temperature than the PE film mulch, they were still higher than the un-mulched control. Furthermore, the soil bacterial community composition and ecological network were not markedly affected by different mulching conditions. However, the PP-SH treatment significantly increased the abundance of Pseudomonas, Nitrosomonas, and Streptomyces genera. Moreover, Lactobacillus and Gp16 were substantially more abundant in the PPC-black (BK) and PPC-brown (BR) treatments compared to the PE mulching treatment. This study could provide valuable insights into the ecological benefits of BMFs in pepper cultivation. However, as our experiments were conducted for only one season, it is imperative to undertake long-term experiments across consecutive seasons and years for a thorough understanding and comprehensive study. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Mulching on Crop Production and Farmland Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3008 KiB  
Article
Environmental Impact of Various Rice Cultivation Methods in Northeast China through Life Cycle Assessment
by Yu Wang, Wenqing He, Changrong Yan, Haihe Gao, Jixiao Cui and Qin Liu
Agronomy 2024, 14(2), 267; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy14020267 - 25 Jan 2024
Viewed by 812
Abstract
Rice, a crucial staple in China, is cultivated through various techniques, including seedling transplanting, dry direct seeding, and film mulching. Despite its significance, rice production is a considerable environmental burden. Using a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aimed to evaluate the [...] Read more.
Rice, a crucial staple in China, is cultivated through various techniques, including seedling transplanting, dry direct seeding, and film mulching. Despite its significance, rice production is a considerable environmental burden. Using a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aimed to evaluate the environmental impacts of four rice cultivation methods (transplanting rice, dry direct-seeding rice, dry direct-seeding rice with polyethylene film (PE), and dry direct-seeding rice with biodegradable film) in Northeast China. The results indicate that the magnitude of environmental impacts among treatments was consistent across years. The potential values of all environmental impacts of the four different cultivation methods of rice in the 2021 field trial were smaller than the results of the same cultivation method of rice system in the 2022 field trial. Among the four rice cultivation methods, the consumption of energy showed inconsistency over the two years, with the highest energy consumption in the first year being for dry seeding with PE film and in the second year for dry seeding without film. Additionally, transplanting exhibited the highest impact on water resource consumption and climate change. Dry direct-seeding rice displayed the highest eutrophication and ecotoxicity. Dry direct-seeding rice with a biodegradable film had the least impact in terms of acidification. Moreover, dry direct-seeding rice with a biodegradable film minimized water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions without compromising yield. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact of Mulching on Crop Production and Farmland Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

1. Impact of Straw Mulching Amount on Soil Environment, Water Use Efficiency, and Yield Formation of Soybeans in the Loess Plateau Region
Back to TopTop