Next Article in Journal
Reaching Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Does Not Correlate with Patient Satisfaction
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Hospital Transfers on Surgical Delay and Associated Postoperative Outcomes for Hip Fracture Patients in Scotland: A Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Right Ventricular Dysfunction before and after Cardiac Surgery: Prognostic Implications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism—A Case Report and Literature Review

by
Lukas Ley
1,2,*,
Florian Messmer
1,
Lukas Vaisnora
3,
Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani
4,
Dirk Bandorski
5 and
Michael Kostrzewa
1
1
Department of Radiology, Baden Cantonal Hospital, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
2
Campus Kerckhoff, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany
3
Department of Cardiology, Baden Cantonal Hospital, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
4
Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), 35392 Giessen, Germany
5
Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University Campus Hamburg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 March 2024 / Revised: 24 March 2024 / Accepted: 24 April 2024 / Published: 26 April 2024

Abstract

:
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease with an annual incidence of about 1/1000 persons. About every sixth patient dies within the first 30 days after diagnosis. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests performed, and is able to confirm the suspicion of PE with typical electrocardiographic signs. Some ECG signs and their regression are also prognostically relevant. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is one option for PE treatment, and aims to relieve right heart strain immediately. The first studies on endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using a dedicated device (FlowTriever System, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) yielded promising results. Methods: In the following, we report the case of a 66-year-old male patient who presented with New York Heart Association III dyspnea in our emergency department. Among typical clinical and laboratory results, he displayed very impressive electrocardiographic and radiological findings at the time of PE diagnosis. Results: After endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, the patient’s complaints and pulmonary hemodynamics improved remarkably. In contrast, the ECG worsened paradoxically 18 h after intervention. Nevertheless, control echocardiography 4 days after the intervention no longer showed any signs of right heart strain, and dyspnea had disappeared completely. At a 4-month follow-up visit, the patient presented as completely symptom-free with a high quality of life. His ECG and echocardiography were normal and excluded recurrent right heart strain. Conclusions: Overall, the patient benefitted remarkably from endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, resulting in an almost complete resolution of electrocardiographic PE signs at the 4-month follow-up after exhibiting multiple typical electrocardiographic PE signs at time of diagnosis and initial electrocardiographic worsening 18 h post successful intervention.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs with an annual incidence of 0.4–1.2/1000 persons [1]. Together with deep vein thrombosis (DVT), it is the third most common acute cardiovascular syndrome worldwide after myocardial infarction and stroke [2]. An up-to-date registry reports an overall 16% 30-day mortality rate [3]. In the European Union, PE and DVT account for up to EUR 8.5 billion in healthcare costs every year, and will probably place an even greater burden on healthcare systems in the future [1,4]. Because of its ubiquitous availability, inexpensiveness, ease of use and good diagnostic performance, the electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the first diagnostic tests to be performed in an emergency setting, especially in patients with cardiac or respiratory symptoms. The ECG is able to confirm the suspicion of PE through typical electrocardiographic changes [1,5,6,7]. However, electrocardiographic PE signs are absent in about 15–40% of PE patients, particularly in milder courses [5,6,8,9,10]. Nevertheless, some ECG changes (e.g., sinus tachycardia, SIQIII type, right bundle branch block and T wave inversions) have prognostic significance [5,8,9,11,12,13]. A dreaded complication of PE is right heart failure, which can lead to subsequent death [1]. Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using a dedicated device (FlowTriever System, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) is a minimally invasive treatment option for PE. Mechanical thrombectomy can result in the immediate relief of right heart strain, and early studies demonstrated high efficiency and low mortality [1,14,15,16,17]. In the following report, we present the case of a patient who displayed impressive electrocardiographic and radiological findings at the time of PE diagnosis, and benefitted remarkably from endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the electrocardiographic course after successful PE treatment with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever System.

2. Patient

A 66-year-old male patient with a BMI of 27.2 kg/m2 presented to his family doctor with exertional dyspnea (New York Heart Association (NYHA) II) after being on a hiking vacation and was referred to our radiology department to rule out PE. However, because his dyspnea worsened significantly (NYHA III), the patient directly presented to our emergency department. No clinical evidence of acute DVT could be evaluated. However, the patient described a previous episode of sudden onset exertional dyspnea with rapid resolution 3 years ago, and previous signs and symptoms suspicious of DVT about 20 years ago. He also suffered from arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia. In the emergency room, the patient presented with sinus tachycardia (129 bpm), elevated blood pressure (149/102 mm Hg), decreased O2 saturation (94%) and borderline tachypnoea (20 breaths/min). Typical electrocardiographic PE signs could be found (Figure 1).
The ECG revealed sinus tachycardia (116 bpm), an SIQIII type, an incomplete right bundle branch block (RBBB, QRS time: 110 ms) and persistent S waves in leads V5 and V6. In addition, T wave inversions (TWI) were found in leads III, aVF and V1–V3. Moreover, a parameter for right heart strain (R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1) exceeded a threshold of 0.6 mV (0.7 mV), and the time to peak of the R wave in V1 was longer than a threshold of 35 ms (60 ms) [18]. Due to the suspicion of PE, Wells I and Wells II scores were assessed, and the results (6/12.5 and 3/7, respectively) indicated likely PE [19,20]. Due to the patient’s hemodynamic stability, a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) was performed, in which a bilateral, central saddle PE and vivid signs of right heart strain (right ventricle-to-left ventricle diameter ratio: 2.2) were observed (Figure 2).
Elevation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (43 ng/L) and NT-pro-BNP levels (3538 ng/L), as well as the hypoxemic respiratory failure found in the arterial blood gases (pO2: 67 mm Hg, pCO2: 24 mm Hg), underpinned the diagnosis. Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) and simplified PESI (sPESI) scores were calculated to be 96 and 1, respectively [21,22]. From his PESI score, the patient was categorized as class III, revealing a moderate 30-day mortality risk (approximately 3–7%) [1,21]. Clinically, the patient was classified as intermediate–high risk [1]. Moreover, a DVT in the medial segment of the left posterior tibial vein was detected by compression ultrasonography. Based on this, he was anticoagulated therapeutically with unfractionated heparin by use of a perfusor. Interventional radiology was contacted with the request for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, and the patient was transferred to the angiography suite. After bilateral ultrasound-guided access to the common femoral veins, thrombus in the pelvic veins and the inferior vena cava were ruled out using phlebography. The pulmonary trunk was selected using a 5F pigtail catheter, pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) were measured, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed (Figure 3). PAP measurements revealed elevated pressures with a mean PAP (mPAP) of 42 mm Hg. DSA confirmed CT findings with filling defects and a lack of contrasting of pulmonary parenchyma, especially in the right lower lobe. A stiff guidewire was navigated into the right lower lobe pulmonary artery. The 24F endovascular mechanical thrombectomy device (FlowTriever System) was advanced into the right lower lobar artery. Abundant embolic material was retrieved by repeated aspiration thrombectomy. In the left lung, initial attempts failed. By switching to a FlowTriever catheter containing disks for mechanical thrombus maceration and subsequently continuing aspiration thrombectomy, abundant embolic material was extracted from the left pulmonary arteries as well, particularly from the left lower lobar artery. The thrombi recovered from the pulmonary arteries are shown in Figure 4. Subsequently, a control DSA revealed open and well-perfused pulmonary arteries with only minimal residual thrombotic material (Figure 5). The mPAP immediately decreased by 28 mm Hg from an initial 42 to 14 mm Hg (systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP): 65 → 28 mm Hg; diastolic pulmonary artery pressure: 29 → 6 mm Hg). After the intervention, the patient was hemodynamically stable and free of complaints, only experiencing slight remaining exertional dyspnea. From the patient’s perspective, the intervention was well tolerated. To minimize blood loss during the procedure, an autotransfusion system was used (FlowSaver, Inari Medical, Irvine, CA, USA). Moreover, it was carried out without complications, apart from a small postinterventional venous bleed at the access site in the right groin, which was managed by manual compression.
After the intervention, the patient spent a total of 5 days in hospital, including one day in intermediate care and none in the intensive care unit (ICU). Oral anticoagulation with apixaban was started the day after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (7 days 2 × 10 mg, then 2 × 5 mg). Despite the patient’s symptoms and pulmonary hemodynamics improving significantly, lucid signs of right heart strain could still be found in the ECG approximately 18 h after thrombectomy (Figure 6).
Although the patient’s ECG no longer revealed tachycardia (82 bpm) or RBBB (QRS: 90 ms) or exceeded the threshold of the parameter “R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1” (>0.6 mV, here 0.2 mV), an SIQIII type, persistent S waves in V5 and V6, and a time to peak of R wave in V1 longer than a threshold of 35 ms (40 ms) remained. Furthermore, the S wave in V6 now exceeded a defined threshold for right heart strain (>0.3 mV, here 0.32 mV), TWIs were now additionally seen in leads V4 and V5, and the Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy was deemed positive (>1.05 mV, here 1.2 mV). A newly emerged accentuated P wave was also detected in the precordial leads (0.2 mV), by definition a P pulmonale (>0.15 mV in precordial leads) [23]. However, control echocardiography performed later, 4 days after the intervention, no longer showed signs of right heart strain. In addition, the dyspnea disappeared completely by the time of discharge at 5 days after the procedure. In a follow-up visit approximately 4 months after the intervention, the patient presented completely symptom free (NYHA III at diagnosis). His heart rate (129 → 78/min), respiratory rate (20 → 12 breaths/min) and oxygen saturation (94 → 96%) were now unremarkable. Nevertheless, the patient had persistent high blood pressure (149/102 → 154/97 mm Hg) due to his arterial hypertension. Also, high-sensitivity troponin T (43.2 → 13 ng/L), NT-pro-BNP (3538 → 129 ng/L), CRP (13.2 → 7.2 mg/L), creatinine (133 → 110 µmol/L) and eGFR (48 → 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) improved. The follow-up ECG was normal. Only a persistent TWI in lead III and small persistent S waves in V5/V6 were still detectable. All other previous ECG changes had resolved (Figure 7).
Echocardiography also excluded recurrent right heart strain. The values for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, 60%), right atrial pressure (RAP, 5 mm Hg), peak systolic tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV, 2.4 m/s), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, 18 mm), sPAP (28 mm Hg) and TAPSE/sPAP ratio (0.64) were normal. In combination with the absence of symptoms, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease without pulmonary hypertension (CTEPD without PH) and post-pulmonary embolism impairment (PPEI) could be excluded. In addition, with a value of 6.6, the PEmb-QoL questionnaire demonstrated a high quality of life after PE (best value to be reached—6, worst value to be reached—27) [24]. In a thrombophilia evaluation performed about 4 months after diagnosis, an elevated factor VIII level and hyperhomocysteinemia were detected. In combination with the fulminant initial thromboembolic event, the patient was recommended lifelong anticoagulation with apixaban (dose reduction to 2 × 2.5 mg after 6 months).

3. Discussion

3.1. Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism

An up-to-date registry reports an overall 16% 30-day mortality rate for PE, and only half of the high-risk patients survive [3,25]. This illustrates the demand for immediate and successful PE treatment, which could potentially be achieved by recanalizing therapies [1,14,15]. Currently, the ESC/ERS guideline recommends the use of recanalization therapies only in hemodynamically unstable patients and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy only as an alternative to systemic thrombolysis in case of contraindications or treatment failure [1]. For intermediate–high-risk patients, an ESC consensus statement from 2022 recommends catheter-directed therapy (thrombectomy or local thrombolysis) in the absence of improvement with anticoagulation alone and contraindications to systemic thrombolysis, or in the case of unsuccessful systemic thrombolysis [15]. However, systemic as well as catheter-directed thrombolysis carries a bleeding risk (major bleeding in up to 11.5% and 10% and intracranial bleeding in up to 2.4% and 1.9%, respectively), and many patients have contraindications, resulting in only about one-quarter of high-risk patients receiving thrombolysis [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Since endovascular mechanical thrombectomy does not require thrombolytic drugs, the risk of bleeding is reduced significantly [14,16,33]. The optimal treatment approach for intermediate-risk and high-risk PE patients remains unclear. Despite revealing no contraindications to thrombolysis, we found the patient to be a good candidate for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, since an ESC consensus statement from 2022 recommends catheter-directed therapy (thrombectomy or local thrombolysis) in the absence of improvement with anticoagulation alone in intermediate–high-risk patients [15]. The FlowTriever System is one option for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy, and the first studies using this system revealed promising results in intermediate-risk and high-risk patients (0–11.3% major bleeding, 0% intracranial bleeding, 0–2 days ICU stay and 3–10 days total hospital stay, 47–63% without ICU stay, 0–4.3% 30-day all-cause mortality rate, 3–8 mm Hg average mPAP drop) [34,35,36,37,38,39]. In our patient, mPAP decreased by 28 mm Hg, from an initial 42 to 14 mm Hg, after thrombectomy. No major bleeding occurred. After the intervention, our patient did not stay in the ICU and stayed in hospital for a total of 5 days. Four months after the intervention, he presented as completely symptom free, without electrocardiographic or echocardiographic evidence of recurrent right heart strain or dysfunction and with high quality of life.

3.2. ECG in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism

The ECG is one of the first diagnostic tests to be performed in patients with suspected PE, and is able to confirm the suspicion through typical electrocardiographic changes [1,5,6,7]. In a healthy human, the left ventricle masks the right ventricle in an electrocardiogram due to its larger muscle mass. But, as soon as the right ventricle is exposed to increased volume and/or pressure, as it is in PE, the right ventricle pulls the electrical forces more forward, and is able to induce visible electrocardiographic changes. Lead V1 usually shows electrocardiographic pathologies most clearly and promptly, as it is the lead closest to the right heart [40,41,42]. Typical electrocardiographic PE signs are sinus tachycardia or supraventricular tachycardia (e.g., atrial fibrillation), P pulmonale, QRS axis associated with right heart strain (SIQIII or SISIISIII type, right axis deviation > 90°), right bundle branch block (RBBB), qR configuration in V1, TWI, and ST segment depressions or elevations [1,5,6,7]. Unfortunately, ECG parameters are lacking sufficient sensitivity (0.5–77%), specificity (70–100%), positive predictive value (PPV, 23–69%) and negative predictive value (NPV, 64–83%) to definitively diagnose or exclude PE [6,43,44]. Electrocardiographic PE signs sometimes also occur in healthy subjects and are absent in about 15–40% of PE patients [5,6,9,45]. Nevertheless, many studies have pointed out the prognostic value of several ECG parameters in PE patients [5,8,9,11,12,13]. Some of these, which our patient also exhibited, are sinus tachycardia, SIQIII type, RBBB and TWI, which suggest right ventricular dysfunction and are associated with higher mortality and complication rates [11,13,44,46,47]. For example, the more leads that exhibit TWI, the more likely it is for right ventricular dysfunction and death to occur. Kosuge et al. showed that when TWI occurred in seven leads or more, 100% of the patients had right ventricular dysfunction, and 46% died or needed catecholamine support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or mechanical cardiovascular support. However, it was also found that the more the T waves normalized after therapy, the better the prognosis [47,48,49]. Our patient revealed TWI in seven or more leads (III, aVF, V1–V5) and consecutive right ventricular dysfunction on CTPA, but never needed catecholamine support, cardiopulmonary resuscitation or mechanical cardiovascular support. Previous studies discovered that ECG changes due to PE can vanish after treatment initiation [7,50,51,52], sometimes within 24 h. Alternatively, the ECG can deteriorate initially and improve only after a few days [52,53]. In some cases, the ECG changes persist long-term [52]. Our patient showed five TWIs (III, aVF, V1–V3) at time of diagnosis, seven TWIs (III, aVF, V1–V5) 18 h after intervention, and only one residual TWI (III) at the 4-month follow-up. All other ECG pathologies besides small persistent S waves in V5/V6 had disappeared at this point. We hypothesized that the ECG changes had vanished between the second ECG (18 h after the intervention) and follow-up echocardiography (4 days after the intervention). This fits in well with the fact that the patient’s dyspnea disappeared gradually and only completely after 5 days. Moreover, this demonstrates that the ECG can initially worsen but then improve significantly. Additionally, the present ECG shows that our patient’s prognosis was initially poor, but his prognosis improved significantly after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy.

3.3. Role of the ECG in Pulmonary Embolism Sequalae

The ECG has proven useful in the early detection of long-term PE sequelae [54]. Three PE sequelae can be distinguished: CTEPH, CTEPD without PH and PPEI [1,55,56]. Persistent symptoms and/or right ventricular dysfunction from PPEI occur in about every two to six patients, increasing the risk of re-hospitalization, death, and a lower quality of life [55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. CTEPH and CTEPD without PH typically present as unclear exertional dyspnea after PE [1,62,63]. Both are characterized by alterations of the pulmonary vessels but differ in pulmonary hemodynamics (CTEPH: mPAP > 20 mm Hg; CTEPD without PH: mPAP ≤ 20 mm Hg) [62,63]. CTEPH occurs in about 2–3% of PE survivors and is diagnosed with an average delay of 14–15 months [56,64,65,66,67]. An algorithm comprising an assessment of CTEPH probability (risk factors and symptoms), ECG criteria, NT-pro-BNP, and echocardiography was able to diagnose CTEPH with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 100%, respectively, (PPV: 100%; NPV: 100%) 4 months post-PE [54]. Therefore, ECG may contribute to the early diagnosis of CTEPH but cannot reliably rule out CTEPH, as the ECG can be completely normal in mild PH [18,40]. In our patient, an interesting ECG parameter (R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1) usually applied to PH patients exceeded a threshold of >0.6 mV at the time of diagnosis, indicating right heart strain. At 18 h and 4 months after the intervention, the threshold was no longer exceeded. In CTEPH patients with chronic right heart strain, this parameter appears able to support a CTEPH diagnosis, indicate therapeutic improvement, estimate pulmonary hemodynamics and predict severe disease with increased mortality [18]. It may also be helpful in PE patients to detect acute (PE) and/or chronic right heart strain (CTEPH).

4. Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report on the electrocardiographic course after successful PE treatment with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever System. In patients with PE, an ECG can display vivid signs of right heart strain, which can help to suspect PE or assess the patient’s prognosis. The ECG can initially worsen even after successful treatment, but it then improves, as was observed in this case. Moreover, the present case report indicates that endovascular mechanical thrombectomy is highly effective in reducing acute right heart strain as evidenced by a significant and immediate reduction in mPAP, leading to the sustained improvement of right heart function as demonstrated by a largely normalized ECG after about 4 months. However, despite normal echocardiography, freedom from symptoms and good quality of life, two small, but irrelevant, electrocardiographic abnormalities remained after the intervention. An ECG parameter (R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1) that currently is only applied to PH patients with chronic right heart strain may also be helpful in identifying PE patients with acute (PE) and/or chronic right heart strain (CTEPH).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.L.; methodology, L.L.; validation, F.M. and M.K.; formal analysis, L.L.; investigation, D.B., F.M., L.L., L.V. and M.K.; resources, F.M. and M.K.; data curation, F.M., L.L. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, L.L.; writing—review and editing, D.B., F.M., H.A.G., L.V. and M.K.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the subject involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are completely contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

M.K. is involved as a consultant in Inari Medical Inc. and Siemens Healthineers. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

References

  1. Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.J.; Harjola, V.-P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jiménez, D.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 543–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Raskob, G.E.; Angchaisuksiri, P.; Blanco, A.N.; Buller, H.; Gallus, A.; Hunt, B.J.; Hylek, E.M.; Kakkar, A.; Konstantinides, S.V.; McCumber, M.; et al. Thrombosis: A major contributor to global disease burden. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 2363–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schultz, J.; Giordano, N.; Zheng, H.; Parry, B.A.; Barnes, G.D.; Heresi, G.A.; Jaber, W.; Wood, T.; Todoran, T.; Courtney, D.M.; et al. EXPRESS: A Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT)—Experience from a national multicenter consortium. Pulm. Circ. 2019, 9, 2045894018824563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barco, S.; Woersching, A.L.; Spyropoulos, A.C.; Piovella, F.; Mahan, C.E. European Union-28: An annualised cost-of-illness model for venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Haemost. 2016, 115, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Weekes, A.J.; Raper, J.D.; Thomas, A.M.; Lupez, K.; Cox, C.A.; Esener, D.; Boyd, J.S.; Nomura, J.T.; Davison, J.; Ockerse, P.M.; et al. Electrocardiographic findings associated with early clinical deterioration in acute pulmonary embolism. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2022, 29, 1185–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Thomson, D.; Kourounis, G.; Trenear, R.; Messow, C.-M.; Hrobar, P.; Mackay, A.; Isles, C. ECG in suspected pulmonary embolism. Postgrad. Med. J. 2019, 95, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Petruzzelli, S.; Palla, A.; Pieraccini, F.; Donnamaria, V.; Giuntini, C. Routine electrocardiography in screening for pulmonary embolism. Respiration 1986, 50, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Geibel, A.; Zehender, M.; Kasper, W.; Olschewski, M.; Klima, C.; Konstantinides, S.V. Prognostic value of the ECG on admission in patients with acute major pulmonary embolism. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 25, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Novicic, N.; Dzudovic, B.; Subotic, B.; Shalinger-Martinovic, S.; Obradovic, S. Electrocardiography changes and their significance during treatment of patients with intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2020, 9, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kukla, P.; Długopolski, R.; Krupa, E.; Furtak, R.; Wrabec, K.; Szełemej, R.; Mirek-Bryniarska, E.; Wańczura, P.; Jastrzębski, M.; Bryniarski, L. The value of ECG parameters in estimating myocardial injury and establishing prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Kardiol. Pol. 2011, 69, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Qaddoura, A.; Digby, G.C.; Kabali, C.; Kukla, P.; Zhan, Z.; Baranchuk, A.M. The value of electrocardiography in prognosticating clinical deterioration and mortality in acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Cardiol. 2017, 40, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Digby, G.C.; Kukla, P.; Zhan, Z.; Pastore, C.A.; Piotrowicz, R.; Schapachnik, E.; Zareba, W.; de Luna, A.B.; Pruszczyk, P.; Baranchuk, A.M. The value of electrocardiographic abnormalities in the prognosis of pulmonary embolism: A consensus paper. Ann. Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2015, 20, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shopp, J.D.; Stewart, L.K.; Emmett, T.W.; Kline, J.A. Findings From 12-lead Electrocardiography That Predict Circulatory Shock From Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2015, 22, 1127–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Desai, K.R. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism: Ready for Prime Time? JACC Cardiovascular. Interv. 2021, 14, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pruszczyk, P.; Klok, F.K.; Kucher, N.; Roik, M.; Meneveau, N.; Sharp, A.S.; Nielsen-Kudsk, J.N.-K.; Obradović, S.; Barco, S.; Giannini, F.; et al. Percutaneous treatment options for acute pulmonary embolism: A clinical consensus statement by the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation and Right Ventricular Function and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. EuroIntervention 2022, 18, e623–e638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ghanem, A.; Andrassy, M.; Dürschmied, D.; Fürnau, G.; Geisler, T.; Hennersdorf, M.; Knorr, M.; Lange, T.J.; Masri-Zada, A.; Michels, G.; et al. Interventionelle Therapie und multidisziplinäre Managementstrategien für die akute Lungenembolie. Kardiologie 2023, 17, 141–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chandra, V.M.; Khaja, M.S.; Kryger, M.C.; Sista, A.K.; Wilkins, L.R.; Angle, J.F.; Sharma, A.M. Mechanical aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vasc. Med. 2022, 27, 574–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ley, L.; Wiedenroth, C.B.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Hoeltgen, R.; Bandorski, D. Analysis of Electrocardiographic Criteria of Right Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension before and after Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Anderson, D.R.; Rodger, M.; Ginsberg, J.S.; Kearon, C.; Gent, M.; Turpie, A.G.G.; Bormanis, J.; Weitz, J.; Chamberlain, M.; Bowie, D.; et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: Increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb. Haemost. 2000, 83, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sohne, M.; A Kruip, M.J.H.; Tick, L.W.; E Gerdes, V.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Wells, P.S.; Buller, H.R.; Gibson, N.S.; the Christopher study investigators. Further validation and simplification of the Wells clinical decision rule in pulmonary embolism. Thromb. Haemost. 2008, 99, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aujesky, D.; Obrosky, D.S.; Stone, R.A.; Auble, T.E.; Perrier, A.; Cornuz, J.; Roy, P.-M.; Fine, M.J. Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 172, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiménez, D.; Aujesky, D.; Moores, L.; Gómez, V.; Lobo, J.L.; Uresandi, F.; Otero, R.; Monreal, M.; Muriel, A.; Yusen, R.D. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010, 170, 1383–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hancock, E.W.; Deal, B.J.; Mirvis, D.M.; Okin, P.; Kligfield, P.; Gettes, L.S. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: Part V: Electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society: Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. Circulation 2009, 119, e251–e261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Klok, F.A.; Cohn, D.M.; Middeldorp, S.; Scharloo, M.; Büller, H.R.; van Kralingen, K.W.; Kaptein, A.A.; Huisman, M.V. Quality of life after pulmonary embolism: Validation of the PEmb-QoL Questionnaire. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2010, 8, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stein, P.D.; Matta, F.; Hughes, P.G.; Hughes, M.J. Nineteen-Year Trends in Mortality of Patients Hospitalized in the United States with High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism. Am. J. Med. 2021, 134, 1260–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Geller, B.J.; Adusumalli, S.; Pugliese, S.C.; Khatana, S.A.M.; Nathan, A.; Weinberg, I.; Jaff, M.R.; Kobayashi, T.; A Mazurek, J.; Khandhar, S.; et al. Outcomes of catheter-directed versus systemic thrombolysis for the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A real-world analysis of national administrative claims. Vasc. Med. 2020, 25, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Piazza, G.; Hohlfelder, B.; Jaff, M.R.; Ouriel, K.; Engelhardt, T.C.; Sterling, K.M.; Jones, N.J.; Gurley, J.C.; Bhatheja, R.; Kennedy, R.J.; et al. A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial of Ultrasound-Facilitated, Catheter-Directed, Low-Dose Fibrinolysis for Acute Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: The SEATTLE II Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2015, 8, 1382–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tapson, V.F.; Sterling, K.; Jones, N.; Elder, M.; Tripathy, U.; Brower, J.; Maholic, R.L.; Ross, C.B.; Natarajan, K.; Fong, P.; et al. A Randomized Trial of the Optimum Duration of Acoustic Pulse Thrombolysis Procedure in Acute Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: The OPTALYSE PE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2018, 11, 1401–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Meyer, G.; Vicaut, E.; Danays, T.; Agnelli, G.; Becattini, C.; Beyer-Westendorf, J.; Bluhmki, E.; Bouvaist, H.; Brenner, B.; Couturaud, F.; et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1402–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chatterjee, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Weinberg, I.; Kadakia, M.; Wilensky, R.L.; Sardar, P.; Kumbhani, D.J.; Mukherjee, D.; Jaff, M.R.; Giri, J. Thrombolysis for pulmonary embolism and risk of all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2014, 311, 2414–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Marti, C.; John, G.; Konstantinides, S.; Combescure, C.; Sanchez, O.; Lankeit, M.; Meyer, G.; Perrier, A. Systemic thrombolytic therapy for acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Keller, K.; Hobohm, L.; Ebner, M.; Kresoja, K.-P.; Münzel, T.; Konstantinides, S.V.; Lankeit, M. Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Götzinger, F.; Lauder, L.; Sharp, A.S.P.; Lang, I.M.; Rosenkranz, S.; Konstantinides, S.; Edelman, E.R.; Böhm, M.; Jaber, W.; Mahfoud, F. Interventional therapies for pulmonary embolism. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023, 20, 670–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Silver, M.J.; Gibson, C.M.; Giri, J.; Khandhar, S.; Jaber, W.; Toma, C.; Mina, B.; Bowers, T.; Greenspon, L.; Kado, H.; et al. Outcomes in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Undergoing FlowTriever Mechanical Thrombectomy or Other Contemporary Therapies: Results from the FLAME Study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2023, 16, e013406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jaber, W.A.; Kabrhel, C.; Rosenfield, K.; Tu, T.; Ouriel, K.; Tapson, V.F. Percutaneous Thrombectomy in Emergency Department Patients with Pulmonary Embolism: The FLARE ED Sub-study. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 58, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Toma, C.; Jaber, W.A.; Weinberg, M.D.; Bunte, M.C.; Khandhar, S.; Stegman, B.; Gondi, S.; Chambers, J.; Amin, R.; Leung, D.A.; et al. Acute outcomes for the full US cohort of the FLASH mechanical thrombectomy registry in pulmonary embolism. EuroIntervention 2023, 18, 1201–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Toma, C.; Khandhar, S.; Zalewski, A.M.; D‘Auria, S.J.; Tu, T.M.; Jaber, W.A. Percutaneous thrombectomy in patients with massive and very high-risk submassive acute pulmonary embolism. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2020, 96, 1465–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wible, B.C.; Buckley, J.R.; Cho, K.H.; Bunte, M.C.; Saucier, N.A.; Borsa, J.J. Safety and Efficacy of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Treated via Large-Bore Aspiration Mechanical Thrombectomy Using the Inari FlowTriever Device. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2019, 30, 1370–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tu, T.; Toma, C.; Tapson, V.F.; Adams, C.; Jaber, W.A.; Silver, M.; Khandhar, S.; Amin, R.; Weinberg, M.; Engelhardt, T.; et al. A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Trial of Catheter-Directed Mechanical Thrombectomy for Intermediate-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The FLARE Study. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2019, 12, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ley, L.; Höltgen, R.; Bogossian, H.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Bandorski, D. Electrocardiogram in patients with pulmonary hypertension. J. Electrocardiol. 2023, 79, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Surawicz, B.; Knilans, T.K. Chou’s Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  42. Macfarlane, P.W.; van Oosterom, A.; Pahlm, O.; Kligfield, P.; Janse, M.; Camm, J. (Eds.) Comprehensive Electrocardiology, 2nd ed.; Springer: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sukhija, R.; Aronow, W.S.; Ahn, C.; Kakar, P. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with right ventricular dilation due to acute pulmonary embolism. Cardiology 2006, 105, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hariharan, P.; Dudzinski, D.M.; Okechukwu, I.; Takayesu, J.K.; Chang, Y.; Kabrhel, C. Association between electrocardiographic findings, right heart strain, and short-term adverse clinical events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Clin. Cardiol. 2015, 38, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Marchick, M.R.; Courtney, D.M.; Kabrhel, C.; Nordenholz, K.E.; Plewa, M.C.; Richman, P.B.; Smithline, H.A.; Kline, J.A. 12-lead ECG findings of pulmonary hypertension occur more frequently in emergency department patients with pulmonary embolism than in patients without pulmonary embolism. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2010, 55, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Keller, K.; Beule, J.; Balzer, J.O.; Dippold, W. Right bundle branch block and SIQIII-type patterns for risk stratification in acute pulmonary embolism. J. Electrocardiol. 2016, 49, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kosuge, M.; Kimura, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Ebina, T.; Hibi, K.; Tsukahara, K.; Kanna, M.; Iwahashi, N.; Okuda, J.; Nozawa, N.; et al. Prognostic significance of inverted T waves in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Circ. J. 2006, 70, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Choi, B.-Y.; Park, D.-G. Normalization of negative T-wave on electrocardiography and right ventricular dysfunction in patients with an acute pulmonary embolism. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2012, 27, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kukla, P.; McIntyre, W.F.; Fijorek, K.; Długopolski, R.; Mirek-Bryniarska, E.; Bryniarski, K.L.; Jastrzębski, M.; Bryniarski, L.; Baranchuk, A. T-wave inversion in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Prognostic value. Heart Lung 2015, 44, 68–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liu, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C. Analysis of the electrocardiographic findings in 288 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2010, 33, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Cheng, A.S.H.; Money-Kyrle, A. Instructive ECG series in massive bilateral pulmonary embolism. Heart 2005, 91, 860–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yoshinaga, T.; Ikeda, S.; Nishimura, E.; Shioguchi, K.; Shikuwa, M.; Miyahara, Y.; Kohno, S. Serial changes in negative T wave on electrocardiogram in acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Int. J. Cardiol. 1999, 72, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Akula, R.; Hasan, S.P.; Alhassen, M.; Mujahid, H.; Amegashie, E. Right-sided EKG in pulmonary embolism. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2003, 95, 714–717. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Boon, G.J.A.M.; Ende-Verhaar, Y.M.; Bavalia, R.; El Bouazzaoui, L.H.; Delcroix, M.; Dzikowska-Diduch, O.; Huisman, M.V.; Kurnicka, K.; A Mairuhu, A.T.; Middeldorp, S.; et al. Non-invasive early exclusion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: The InShape II study. Thorax 2021, 76, 1002–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Klok, F.A.; van Kralingen, K.W.; van Dijk, A.P.J.; Heyning, F.H.; Vliegen, H.W.; Huisman, M.V. Prevalence and potential determinants of exertional dyspnea after acute pulmonary embolism. Respir. Med. 2010, 104, 1744–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Valerio, L.; Barco, S.; Abele, C.; Becker, D.; Bruch, L.; Ewert, R.; Faehling, M.; Fistera, D.; Gerhardt, F.; Ghofrani, H.A.; et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and impairment after pulmonary embolism: The FOCUS study. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3387–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kline, J.A.; Steuerwald, M.T.; Marchick, M.R.; Hernandez-Nino, J.; Rose, G.A. Prospective evaluation of right ventricular function and functional status 6 months after acute submassive pulmonary embolism: Frequency of persistent or subsequent elevation in estimated pulmonary artery pressure. Chest 2009, 136, 1202–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sista, A.K.; Miller, L.E.; Kahn, S.R.; Kline, J.A. Persistent right ventricular dysfunction, functional capacity limitation, exercise intolerance, and quality of life impairment following pulmonary embolism: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Vasc. Med. 2017, 22, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sista, A.K.; Klok, F.A. Late outcomes of pulmonary embolism: The post-PE syndrome. Thromb. Res. 2018, 164, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, D.; Fan, G.; Zhang, X.; Xi, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, A.; Zhai, Z. Prevalence of long-term right ventricular dysfunction after acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine 2023, 62, 102153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kahn, S.R.; Hirsch, A.M.; Akaberi, A.; Hernandez, P.; Anderson, D.R.; Wells, P.S.; Rodger, M.A.; Solymoss, S.; Kovacs, M.J.; Rudski, L.; et al. Functional and Exercise Limitations After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: Results of the ELOPE Prospective Cohort Study. Chest 2017, 151, 1058–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Humbert, M.; Kovacs, G.; Hoeper, M.M.; Badagliacca, R.; Berger, R.M.; Brida, M.; Carlsen, J.; Coats, A.J.; Escribano-Subias, P.; Ferrari, P.; et al. 2022 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 3618–3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ley, L.; Grimminger, F.; Richter, M.; Tello, K.; Ghofrani, A.; Bandorski, D. The Early Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2023, 120, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ende-Verhaar, Y.M.; Cannegieter, S.C.; Noordegraaf, A.V.; Delcroix, M.; Pruszczyk, P.; Mairuhu, A.T.; Huisman, M.V.; Klok, F.A. Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after acute pulmonary embolism: A contemporary view of the published literature. Eur. Respir. J. 2017, 49, 1601792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pepke-Zaba, J.; Delcroix, M.; Lang, I.; Mayer, E.; Jansa, P.; Ambroz, D.; Treacy, C.; D’Armini, A.M.; Morsolini, M.; Snijder, R.; et al. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): Results from an international prospective registry. Circulation 2011, 124, 1973–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Delcroix, M.; Lang, I.; Pepke-Zaba, J.; Jansa, P.; D’Armini, A.M.; Snijder, R.; Bresser, P.; Torbicki, A.; Mellemkjaer, S.; Lewczuk, J.; et al. Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Results from an International Prospective Registry. Circulation 2016, 133, 859–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Guth, S.; D‘Armini, A.M.; Delcroix, M.; Nakayama, K.; Fadel, E.; Hoole, S.P.; Jenkins, D.P.; Kiely, D.G.; Kim, N.H.; Lang, I.M.; et al. Current strategies for managing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Results of the worldwide prospective CTEPH Registry. ERJ Open Res. 2021, 7, 00850-2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. ECG at time of diagnosis. Annotation: sinus tachycardia (116 bpm); SIQIII type; no P pulmonale; P amplitude in II: 0.12 mV; incomplete right bundle branch block (QRS time: 110 ms); persistent S waves in V5/V6; negative Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 0.65 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 > 0.6 mV (0.7 mV); R wave peak in V1 > 35 ms (60 ms); T wave inversions in III, aVF, V1–V3; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 1. ECG at time of diagnosis. Annotation: sinus tachycardia (116 bpm); SIQIII type; no P pulmonale; P amplitude in II: 0.12 mV; incomplete right bundle branch block (QRS time: 110 ms); persistent S waves in V5/V6; negative Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 0.65 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 > 0.6 mV (0.7 mV); R wave peak in V1 > 35 ms (60 ms); T wave inversions in III, aVF, V1–V3; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Jcm 13 02548 g001
Figure 2. CTPA findings at time of diagnosis. * and **: axial view. ***: coronal view; bilateral, central saddle pulmonary embolism (*, ***); pulmonary artery-to-aorta diameter ratio > 1 (1.1, *); caval contrast reflux (**); D-sign (**); right ventricle-to-left ventricle diameter ratio > 1 (2.2, **); CTPA, computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.
Figure 2. CTPA findings at time of diagnosis. * and **: axial view. ***: coronal view; bilateral, central saddle pulmonary embolism (*, ***); pulmonary artery-to-aorta diameter ratio > 1 (1.1, *); caval contrast reflux (**); D-sign (**); right ventricle-to-left ventricle diameter ratio > 1 (2.2, **); CTPA, computed tomographic pulmonary angiography.
Jcm 13 02548 g002
Figure 3. DSA findings before endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. Annotation: right interlobar artery (*) appears truncated with no parenchymal contrasting of the right lower lobe. There are significant filling defects in the right superior trunk (**), the left interlobar artery (***) and the left apical segmental arteries, also with a lack of contrasting of the corresponding pulmonary parenchyma. DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Figure 3. DSA findings before endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. Annotation: right interlobar artery (*) appears truncated with no parenchymal contrasting of the right lower lobe. There are significant filling defects in the right superior trunk (**), the left interlobar artery (***) and the left apical segmental arteries, also with a lack of contrasting of the corresponding pulmonary parenchyma. DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Jcm 13 02548 g003
Figure 4. Recovered pulmonary thrombi.
Figure 4. Recovered pulmonary thrombi.
Jcm 13 02548 g004
Figure 5. DSA findings after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. Annotation: Near-complete contrasting of the right interlobar artery (*), the right superior trunk (**), left interlobar artery (***) and left apical segmental arteries with only small remaining filling defects corresponding to small residual thrombi. DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Figure 5. DSA findings after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy. Annotation: Near-complete contrasting of the right interlobar artery (*), the right superior trunk (**), left interlobar artery (***) and left apical segmental arteries with only small remaining filling defects corresponding to small residual thrombi. DSA, digital subtraction angiography.
Jcm 13 02548 g005
Figure 6. ECG 18 h after intervention. Annotation: sinus rhythm; 82 bpm; SIQIII type; P pulmonale (P amplitude in V2: 0.2 mV); P amplitude in II: 0.12 mV; no right bundle branch block (QRS time: 90 ms); persistent S waves in V5/V6 (S amplitude V6 > 0.3 mV); positive Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 1.2 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 not > 0.6 mV (0.2 mV); R wave peak in V1 > 35 ms (40 ms); T wave inversions in III, aVF, V1–V5; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 6. ECG 18 h after intervention. Annotation: sinus rhythm; 82 bpm; SIQIII type; P pulmonale (P amplitude in V2: 0.2 mV); P amplitude in II: 0.12 mV; no right bundle branch block (QRS time: 90 ms); persistent S waves in V5/V6 (S amplitude V6 > 0.3 mV); positive Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 1.2 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 not > 0.6 mV (0.2 mV); R wave peak in V1 > 35 ms (40 ms); T wave inversions in III, aVF, V1–V5; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Jcm 13 02548 g006
Figure 7. ECG 4 months after intervention. Annotation: sinus rhythm; 78 bpm; left axis deviation; no P pulmonale; P amplitude in II: 0.06 mV; no right bundle branch block (QRS time: 90 ms); small persistent S waves in V5/V6; negative Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 0.8 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 not > 0.6 mV (0.25 mV); R wave peak in V1 not > 35 ms (30 ms); T wave inversion in III; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Figure 7. ECG 4 months after intervention. Annotation: sinus rhythm; 78 bpm; left axis deviation; no P pulmonale; P amplitude in II: 0.06 mV; no right bundle branch block (QRS time: 90 ms); small persistent S waves in V5/V6; negative Sokolow–Lyon index for right ventricular hypertrophy (>1.05 mV, here 0.8 mV); R V1, V2 + S I, aVL − S V1 not > 0.6 mV (0.25 mV); R wave peak in V1 not > 35 ms (30 ms); T wave inversion in III; no extrasystoles; ECG, electrocardiogram.
Jcm 13 02548 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ley, L.; Messmer, F.; Vaisnora, L.; Ghofrani, H.A.; Bandorski, D.; Kostrzewa, M. Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism—A Case Report and Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 2548. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13092548

AMA Style

Ley L, Messmer F, Vaisnora L, Ghofrani HA, Bandorski D, Kostrzewa M. Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism—A Case Report and Literature Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(9):2548. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13092548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ley, Lukas, Florian Messmer, Lukas Vaisnora, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani, Dirk Bandorski, and Michael Kostrzewa. 2024. "Electrocardiographic Changes after Endovascular Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Patient with Pulmonary Embolism—A Case Report and Literature Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 9: 2548. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm13092548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop