Next Article in Journal
Multi-Omics of Campylobacter jejuni Growth in Chicken Exudate Reveals Molecular Remodelling Associated with Altered Virulence and Survival Phenotypes
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction of Trypanosoma cruzi, Triatomines and the Microbiota of the Vectors—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals the Taxonomic and Functional Characteristics of Rumen Micro-organisms in Gayals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial: Impact of Special Issue “The Microbial Population of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Animals: Impacts on Host Physiology”

by
Jeferson M. Lourenco
and
Todd R. Callaway
*
Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2024 / Published: 25 April 2024

Introduction

In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in the number of papers that have investigated the microbiome of animals and humans [1,2,3]. While the relationship between the microbial population and host has been studied for generations, especially in ruminants, unfortunately, much of our understanding of how this relationship is mediated is focused solely around energy (e.g., carbohydrate conversion to volatile fatty acids) and the production of microbial protein. As we have increasingly examined the microbial–host interactions with next-generation sequencing and other current techniques, it has become apparent that the relationships between the microbes and the host are multifaceted and involve many levels of communication [4,5,6]. Ultimately, such interactions can result in distinct combinations of metabolites being produced, with significant impacts on the host [7,8]. Thus, from an animal production perspective, the microbial population can dramatically impact animal health and productivity [3,9,10].
This Special Issue of Microorganisms collected eight research articles and three reviews on how the microbial population affects the host animal’s physiology and health. The relationship between the microbial population and host varies based on the animal species; however, across species a common theme emerged, in that we are only scratching the surface in our understanding of the degree to which the native (or introduced) microbial populations can impact the host animal. Several different species of animals were discussed, from teleost fish, shrimp, and gerbils to ruminant animals, as well as humans, highlighting the similarities in the impacts of microbes on the host, from the gut–lung axis to the traditional gut ecosystem, including the impact of diet on the microbial populations. Linkages between the vitamin status and the microbial population in cattle with Johne’s disease were an important point of discussion that brings new considerations to how we view the depth of microbe–host interactions.
The broad selection of topics presented in this collection highlights how far we have come in expanding our knowledge of the microbe–host relationships. However, the more we have learned about these interactions, the more questions have arisen, both in terms of methodology and also about which interactions are most critical in terms of their impact on the host physiology [11,12]. Is it the stimulation of the immune system? Is it the education of the immune system? How important is the production/degradation of vitamins? What role do volatile fatty acids play in host growth? How many catecholamine-like quorum sensing molecules are present that impact the host, and do these differ in each host species? While these gaps in our knowledge are important and are still significant, it is exciting to see the strides that we have made. However, perhaps more importantly, future research into the host–microbiome interaction will improve and elucidate how we feed animals to improve sustainability and reduce the environmental impact while producing animal protein for a growing global human population [13,14].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Welch, C.B.; Ryman, V.E.; Pringle, T.D.; Lourenco, J.M. Utilizing the Gastrointestinal Microbiota to Modulate Cattle Health through the Microbiome-Gut-Organ Axes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1391.
  • Hernandez, J.; Rhimi, S.; Kriaa, A.; Mariaule, V.; Boudaya, H.; Drut, A.; Jablaoui, A.; Mkaouar, H.; Saidi, A.; Biourge, V.; et al. Domestic Environment and Gut Microbiota: Lessons from Pet Dogs. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 949.
  • Duval, C.; Marie Foucault, B.; Duperron, S. Establishment of the Bacterial Microbiota in a Lab-Reared Model Teleost Fish, the Medaka Oryzias latipes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2280.
  • Xie, S.; Liu, R.; Zhang, H.; Yu, F.; Shi, T.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, X.; Yan, B.; Gao, H.; Wang, P.; et al. Comparative Analyses of the Exopalaemon carinicauda Gut Bacterial Community and Digestive and Immune Enzyme Activity during a 24-Hour Cycle. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2258.
  • Gan, L.; Bo, T.; Liu, W.; Wang, D. The Gut Microbiota May Affect Personality in Mongolian Gerbils. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1054.
  • Lourenco, J.M.; Welch, C.B.; Krause, T.R.; Wieczorek, M.A.; Fluharty, F.L.; Rothrock, M.J.; Pringle, T.D.; Callaway, T.R. Fecal microbiome differences in angus steers with differing feed efficiencies during the feedlot-finishing phase. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1128.
  • Ren, P.; Deng, M.; Feng, J.; Li, R.; Ma, X.; Liu, J.; Wang, D. Partial Replacement of Oat Hay with Whole-Plant Hydroponic Barley Seedlings Modulates Ruminal Microbiota and Affects Growth Performance of Holstein Heifers. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2000.
  • Gao, H.; Yu, Y.; Lv, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Leng, J. Metagenomic Sequencing Reveals the Taxonomic and Functional Characteristics of Rumen Micro-organisms in Gayals. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1098.
  • Ho, K.J.; Ramirez, J.L.; Kulkarni, R.; Harris, K.G.; Helenowski, I.; Xiong, L.; Ozaki, C.K.; Grenon, S.M. Plasma Gut Microbe-Derived Metabolites Associated with Peripheral Artery Disease and Major Adverse Cardiac Events. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2065.
  • González-Vázquez, R.; Zúñiga-León, E.; Torres-Maravilla, E.; Leyte-Lugo, M.; Mendoza-Pérez, F.; Hernández-Delgado, N.C.; Pérez-Pastén-Borja, R.; Azaola-Espinosa, A.; Mayorga-Reyes, L. Genomic and Biochemical Characterization of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum JCLA3 Isolated from Human Intestine. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2100.
  • Wherry, T.L.T.; Stabel, J.R. Bovine Immunity and Vitamin D(3): An Emerging Association in Johne’s Disease. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1865.

References

  1. Seshadri, R.; Leahy, S.C.; Attwood, G.T.; Teh, K.H.; Lambie, S.C.; Cookson, A.L.; Eloe-Fadrosh, E.A.; Pavlopoulos, G.A.; Hadjithomas, M.; Varghese, N.J.; et al. Cultivation and sequencing of rumen microbiome members from the Hungate1000 Collection. Nature Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xiao, L.; Zhao, F. Microbial transmission, colonisation and succession: From pregnancy to infancy. Gut 2023, 72, 772–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shalon, D.; Culver, R.N.; Grembi, J.A.; Folz, J.; Treit, P.V.; Shi, H.; Rosenberger, F.A.; Dethlefsen, L.; Meng, X.; Yaffe, E.; et al. Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions. Nature 2023, 617, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cryan, J.F.; O’Riordan, J.K.; Cowan, C.S.M.; Sandhu, K.V.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Boehme, M.; Codagnone, M.G.; Cussotto, S.; Fulling, C.; Golubeva, A.V.; et al. The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1877–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Freestone, P.; Lyte, M. Stress and microbial endocrinology: Prospects for ruminant nutrition. Animal 2010, 4, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bailey, M.T.; Dowd, S.E.; Parry, N.M.A.; Galley, J.D.; Schauer, D.B.; Lyte, M. Stressor exposure disrupts commensal microbial populations in the intestines and leads to increased colonization by Citrobacter rodentium. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sasson, G.; Ben-Shabat, S.K.; Seroussi, E.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Shterzer, N.; Yaacoby, S.; Miller, M.E.B.; White, B.A.; Halperin, E.; Mizrahi, I. Heritable bovine rumen bacteria are phylogenetically related and correlated with the cow’s capacity to harvest energy from its feed. mBio 2017, 8, e00703-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shabat, S.K.B.; Sasson, G.; Doron-Faigenboim, A.; Durman, T.; Yaacoby, S.; Miller, M.E.B.; White, B.A.; Shterzer, N.; Mizrahi, I. Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2958–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sanders, D.J.; Inniss, S.; Sebepos-Rogers, G.; Rahman, F.Z.; Smith, A.M. The role of the microbiome in gastrointestinal inflammation. Biosci. Rep. 2021, 41, BSR20203850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mayorgas, A.; Dotti, I.; Salas, A. Microbial metabolites, postbiotics, and intestinal epithelial function. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e2000188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adjei-Fremah, S.; Ekwemalor, K.; Asiamah, E.; Ismail, H.; Ibrahim, S.; Worku, M. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and global gene expression in dairy cows. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017, 46, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ohene-Adjei, S.; Teather, R.M.; Ivan, M.; Forster, R.J. Postinoculation protozoan establishment and association patterns of methanogenic archaea in the ovine rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 4609–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wallace, R.J.; Sasson, G.; Garnsworthy, P.C.; Tapio, I.; Gregson, E.; Bani, P.; Huhtanen, P.; Bayat, A.R.; Strozzi, F.; Biscarini, F.; et al. A heritable subset of the core rumen microbiome dictates dairy cow productivity and emissions. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav8391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. De Vrieze, J.; De Mulder, T.; Matassa, S.; Zhou, J.; Angenent, L.T.; Boon, N.; Verstraete, W. Stochasticity in microbiology: Managing unpredictability to reach the Sustainable Development Goals. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lourenco, J.M.; Callaway, T.R. Editorial: Impact of Special Issue “The Microbial Population of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Animals: Impacts on Host Physiology”. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 859. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms12050859

AMA Style

Lourenco JM, Callaway TR. Editorial: Impact of Special Issue “The Microbial Population of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Animals: Impacts on Host Physiology”. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(5):859. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms12050859

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lourenco, Jeferson M., and Todd R. Callaway. 2024. "Editorial: Impact of Special Issue “The Microbial Population of the Gastrointestinal Tract of Animals: Impacts on Host Physiology”" Microorganisms 12, no. 5: 859. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms12050859

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop