Next Article in Journal
Deciphering the Role of USP16 in Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Numerically Stable Magnetic Field Expressions for End-of-Shaft Angle Sensing Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Pulsed Temperature Operation of SnO2-Based Gas Sensors †

1
Materials Center Leoben Forschung GmbH, 8700 Leoben, Austria
2
Department of Engineering “Enzo Ferrari”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
3
Department of Materials Science, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Published: 6 May 2024

Abstract

:
We herein demonstrate the pulsed-mode temperature operation of chemical sensor devices based on thin SnO2 films, which were synthesized by magnetron sputtering. The gas-sensitive films were integrated on SiN-based micro-hotplate (µhp) chips, which enable operation temperatures up to 500 °C. We compared the gas sensor performance in constant temperature mode with pulsed temperature mode operation towards the test gases carbon monoxide and toluene. In contrast to constant temperature, the pulsed temperature mode operation reveals additional information about the type of test gas.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, conductometric chemical sensors based on metal oxides like SnO2, ZnO, CuOx, and WOx are the most promising and investigated types of solid-state sensors [1,2]. Gas sensor devices are of high importance for many applications, where energy-autonomous sensor systems suitable for IoT applications could achieve wide-area pollution monitoring and mapping. Power consumption of such sensor devices, however, is a key performance aspect that is decisive for their application success. Pulsed temperature operation offers much lower power consumption (<1 mW) as compared to conventional DC-mode temperature operation (>30 mW). Moreover, pulsed temperature operation reveals target gas-dependent features in the response, which can be exploited to increase the selectivity of the sensor devices.

2. Methods and Materials

SiN-based µhp chips, which provide a heating structure for operating temperatures up to 500 °C, and electrodes for contacting the SnO2 films were processed by photolithography with a negative resist mask. Next, the SnO2 sensing layer with a thickness of 50 nm was deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering of a Sn target in Ar + O2. Afterwards, the sensors were functionalized with metallic nanoparticles (Ag, Ti, and Cu) synthesized by magnetron sputter inert gas condensation [3] to improve sensitivity and selectivity. The sensor devices were characterized in an automatized setup with synthetic air (80% N2, 20% O2, and humidity 50%) as a background gas and a constant flow rate of 1000 sccm. The target gases are carbon monoxide (CO) and toluene (C7H8).

3. Discussion

A typical resistance measurement of a sensor device is exemplified in Figure 1a, and the temperature cycling schematics are shown in the lower graph. First, the sensors are heated up to 500 °C for 15 min (DC-mode), the test gas (indicated as a grey column) is inserted for 5 min, and the sensors’ resistance decreases. Next, the devices are cooled down to room temperature for 10 min; this is followed by three subsequent heating pulses (pulsed mode—1 min), where only the second heating pulse is applied in presence of the test gases. This procedure is executed three times for 5, 10, and 20 ppm test gas concentration. Figure 1b shows in detail the entirely different resistance gradient behavior (emphasized by the blue circle) in pulsed mode operation for 5 ppm CO and C7H8.
The sensor response (= resistance decrease) in presence of the test gases is comparable to the DC-mode. However, it is obvious that the shape of the response curves (see blue circle in Figure 1b) is entirely different for CO and C7H8. Thus, we conclude that pulsed T-mode operation reveals particular information about the test gas that cannot be derived from DC-mode operation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.E. and A.K.; methodology, A.T. and C.M.; validation, L.E. and L.R.; formal analysis, L.E. and L.R.; investigation, L.E.; writing—original draft preparation, L.E. and A.K.; writing—review and editing, L.E., A.K., A.T. and C.M.; supervision, A.K. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from the ECSEL Joint Undertaking (JU) under grant agreement No 876362. The JU receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Italy, Latvia, Netherlands, Poland, Switzerland. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support under the scope of the COMET program within the K2 Center “Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC- MPPE)” (Project No 886385). This program is supported by the Austrian Federal Ministries for Climate Action, Environment, Energy, Mobility, Innovation and Technology (BMK) and for Labour and Economy (BMAW), represented by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) and the federal states of Styria, Upper Austria and Tyrol.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Barsan, N.; Koziej, D.; Weimar, U. Metal oxide-based gas sensor research: How to? Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 121, 18–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, C.; Yin, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, D.; Gao, R. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: Sensitivity and Influencing Factors. Sensors 2010, 10, 2088–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Steinhauer, S.; Lackner, E.; Sosada-Ludwikowska, F.; Singh, V.; Krainer, J.; Wimmer-Teubenbacher, R.; Grammatikopoulos, P.; Köck, A.; Sowwan, M. Atomic-scale structure and chemical sensing application of ultrasmall size-selected Pt nanoparticles supported on SnO2. Mater. Adv. 2020, 1, 3075–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Typical resistance measurement in DC- and pulsed-mode T operation for CO and C7H8 (5, 10, and then 20 ppm). (b) Comparison of pulsed-mode T operation for 5 ppm of CO and C7H8.
Figure 1. (a) Typical resistance measurement in DC- and pulsed-mode T operation for CO and C7H8 (5, 10, and then 20 ppm). (b) Comparison of pulsed-mode T operation for 5 ppm of CO and C7H8.
Proceedings 97 00211 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Egger, L.; Reiner, L.; Togni, A.; Mitterer, C.; Köck, A. Pulsed Temperature Operation of SnO2-Based Gas Sensors. Proceedings 2024, 97, 211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/proceedings2024097211

AMA Style

Egger L, Reiner L, Togni A, Mitterer C, Köck A. Pulsed Temperature Operation of SnO2-Based Gas Sensors. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/proceedings2024097211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Egger, Larissa, Lisbeth Reiner, Alessandro Togni, Christian Mitterer, and Anton Köck. 2024. "Pulsed Temperature Operation of SnO2-Based Gas Sensors" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 211. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/proceedings2024097211

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop