Next Article in Journal
The Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Cholecalciferol Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
The Genetic Markers of Knee Osteoarthritis in Women from Russia
Previous Article in Journal
Current Photodynamic Therapy for Glioma Treatment: An Update
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implications of siRNA Therapy in Bone Health: Silencing Communicates
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/biomedicines12020376
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Conditioned Medium of Intervertebral Disc Cells Inhibits Osteo-Genesis on Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Osteoblasts

by
Shuimu Chen
1,2,
Andreas S. Croft
1,2,
Sebastian Bigdon
3,
Christoph E. Albers
3,
Zhen Li
4 and
Benjamin Gantenbein
1,3,*
1
Tissue Engineering for Orthopedics & Mechanobiology (TOM), Bone & Joint Program, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
2
Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences (GCB), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
3
Department of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
4
AO Research Institute Davos, 7270 Davos, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2024, 12(2), 376; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biomedicines12020376
Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 31 January 2024 / Accepted: 2 February 2024 / Published: 6 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Musculoskeletal Diseases: From Molecular Basis to Therapy (Volume II))
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Low back pain (LBP) is associated with the degeneration of human intervertebral discs (IVDs). Despite progress in the treatment of LBP through spinal fusion, some cases still end in non-fusion after the removal of the affected IVD tissue. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the remaining IVD cells secrete BMP inhibitors that are sufficient to inhibit osteogenesis in autologous osteoblasts (OBs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). A conditioned medium (CM) from primary human IVD cells in 3D alginate culture was co-cultured with seven donor-matched OB and MSCs. After ten days, osteogenesis was quantified at the transcript level using qPCR to measure the expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists, and at the protein level by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Additionally, cells were evaluated histologically using alizarin red (ALZR) staining on Day 21. For judging ALP activity and osteogenesis, the Noggin expression in samples was investigated to uncover the potential causes. The results after culture with the CM showed significantly decreased ALP activity and the inhibition of the calcium deposit formation in alizarin red staining. Interestingly, no significant changes were found among most bone-related genes and BMP antagonists in OBs and MSCs. Noteworthy, Noggin was relatively expressed higher in human IVD cells than in autologous OBs or MSCs (relative to autologous OB, the average fold change was in 6.9, 10.0, and 6.3 in AFC, CEPC, and NPC, respectively; and relative to autologous MSC, the average fold change was 2.3, 3.4, and 3.2, in AFC, CEPC, and NPC, respectively). The upregulation of Noggin in residual human IVDs could potentially inhibit the osteogenesis of autologous OB and MSC, thus inhibiting the postoperative spinal fusion after discectomy surgery.

1. Introduction

Low back pain (LBP), a significant global health issue and complex condition, arises from a multifaceted interplay of factors [1]. Reverberating across societies worldwide, the challenges posed by LBP are profound: reduced quality of life, impaired mobility, and substantial healthcare costs [2]. The frequent cause is intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration [3,4].
Intervertebral discs are pivotal components of the vertebral column, are situated between adjacent vertebrae, and play a crucial role in maintaining spinal function. These discs possess a distinct structure and composition that enable their essential functions. Comprising the outer annulus fibrosus (AF) and the inner nucleus pulposus (NP), intervertebral discs are designed to withstand mechanical stresses while providing flexibility and shock absorption to the spine [5]. Cartilaginous endplates (CEPs) connect the disc to the adjacent vertebral bodies, enabling nutrient exchange and maintaining disc health [4]. Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is closely associated with the development of LBP. Notably, the degradation of the NP’s water-binding capacity contributes to a diminished disc height and impaired load distribution, which can lead to nerve irritation and pain [6]. Understanding the structure and function of the IVD is fundamental for comprehending spinal health and addressing various spinal disorders. The vertebral bodies on the upper and lower sides of the IVD contain osteoblasts (OBs) and bone marrow. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from the bone marrow can differentiate into osteoblasts. After discectomy in spinal surgery, these MSCs play an important role in the fusion of the spine, contributing to bone formation and repair [7].
The current surgical approach to addressing human IVD degeneration often involves the removal of the affected tissue, followed by the placement of a cage to replace the primary space and promote spinal fusion [4]. However, despite these efforts, there exists a persistent challenge in achieving successful fusion outcomes [8]. Non-fusion or failed fusion after surgery is a recurring concern [9], and identifying the underlying factors has been a focal point of research. One possible explanation is linked to the intricate role of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) antagonists secreted by the IVD itself [10,11]. These antagonists have been associated with inhibiting osteogenesis in the presence of IVD cells [12,13]. Furthermore, co-culture experiments differentiating bone marrow-derived MSC in monolayer to OBs in close contact with IVD tissue revealed obvious zones of inhibition as shown with alizarin red (ALZR) staining (see Figure 2 in ref. [14]). The appearance of inhibition was similar to the agar diffusion methods of testing antibiotics in bacteria [15]. However, in previous studies, all evidence was solely collected from allogenic donors, which can impact the degree of inhibition or could be overlaid by other paracrine effects [12,13]. There is a lack of research on the current understanding of how various cell sources of the human IVD interplay with autologous OBs or MSCs, which are all involved in spinal fusion after discectomy.
In cell biology and tissue engineering, a medium collected from cells is known as the “conditioned medium (CM)” or “secretome”, and it has gained significant attention in recent years due to its assumed regenerative potential. A CM refers to a cell culture medium that has been in contact with primary cells for a specific duration. This medium becomes enriched with various soluble secreted factors, including growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular vesicles, which are released by the cultured cells. These soluble factors can profoundly influence the behavior of cells, including their proliferation and differentiation [16]. Several studies have revealed its role in promoting tissue regeneration [17,18]. Additionally, researchers have also found that an animal-derived nucleus pulposus cell CM can stimulate heterologous MSC differentiation [19]. However, there are no literature reports on the effects of a human IVD-derived CM on autologous surrounding cells, such as OBs and MSCs.
This current study aimed to investigate the relationship between the CM of human IVD and donor-matched OBs/MSCs, exploring how these secreted factors present in the CM influence the cellular behavior of autologous OBs/MSCs. Furthermore, new treatment strategies and therapeutic guidelines could be identified to improve spinal fusion.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Human Materials and Cell Isolation

Multiple samples, i.e., bone fragments, intervertebral disc tissues, and human bone marrow aspirates were collected from the same patients undergoing spinal surgery at the Insel University Hospital with written consent (Table 1 and Table 2). Seven donor-derived MSC/OB cells were used for the culture in the CM obtained from autologous IVD and nine donors for the comparison of Noggin expression between IVD and autologous MSC/OB. All the donor tissues and cells were anonymously collected with written consent. The approvals were either collected under the Swissethics approval (#2019-00097) or were obtained under the general consent of the Insel University Hospital, which also covers the anonymization of health-related data and biological material. Bone fragments from injured vertebral body were cut into smaller pieces of 3–5 mm in diameter. The pieces were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Afterwards, the washed bone pieces were transferred to T75 flasks for culture with α-MEM medium (10% fetal bovine serum, FBS, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 1% penicillin/streptomycin, P/S, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., Buchs, Switzerland). Primary OBs were expanded using the active outgrowth technique and selected for plastic adherence: the medium was exchanged after ~one week of culture time and when several starting populations of OBs were observed. IVD tissues were processed within 24 h after surgery and divided into AF, CEP, and NP tissues (usually performed in the operation theatre by an experienced spine surgeon). Then, these tissues were sequentially digested with 1.9 mg/mL pronase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) for one hour and collagenase II (129 U/mL for AF, 64 U/mL for NP, and 1560 U/mL for CEP; Worthington, London, UK) on a plate shaker at 37 °C overnight. The digested tissue mixture was then passed through a 100μm cell strainer (Falcon, Becton Dickinson, Allschwil, Switzerland) to filter out residual tissue fragments. The obtained cells (AFC, CEPC, and NPC) were cultured in the low-glucose (1 g/L) Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (LG-DMEM, Gibco, Life Technologies, Zug, Switzerland; including 10% FBS, 1% P/S). MSCs were isolated from the mononuclear cell fraction obtained through gradient centrifugation (Histopaque-1077, Sigma-Aldrich) of bone-marrow samples aspirated from vertebrae during spinal surgery (~5–10 mL) [20]. The MSCs were then expanded in an alpha minimum essential medium (α-MEM, from Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% FBS, 1% P/S, and 2.5 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (bFGF2, Peprotech, London, UK) [21]. The cellular phenotypes were verified after expansion through the expression of key marker genes, such as the ratio of relative gene expression between collagen type 2 alpha 1 chain (COL2A1) and collagen type I alpha 2 chain (COL1A2), i.e., col2/col1 ratio. The difference for all cell types is attached in supplementary online Figure S1.

2.2. Alginate Bead and Conditioned Medium

For the generation of the CM, human OB, MSC, and IVD cells (AFC, CEPC, and NPC; passage 2–4) were encapsulated in 1.2% alginate (Fluka, Basel, Switzerland) dissolved in 0.9% sodium chloride solution at a density of 4 million/mL. Then, the alginate solution was flown at a constant rate at 1.5 mL/min (syringe pump TI—Part # 78-8100—Model No. 100, KD Scientific, Holliston, MA, USA) through a 22G needle and dropped into a 102 nM CaCl2 salt solution, which immediately solidified and generated the beads. Within 5 min, the beads underwent rinsing with a 0.9% sodium chloride solution before being transferred to 6-well plates (30 beads/well) and cultured with 4 ml α-MEM (10% FBS, 1% P/S). After three days, the CM was then collected and filtered with a 0.22 μm filter and stored at 4 °C prior to further use (Figure 1).

2.3. Cell culture with Conditioned Medium

Human OB/MSC cells were seeded at 2 × 104 cells/well in 12-well plates in the basal medium (α-MEM; 10% FBS, 1% P/S) and left overnight for cell adherence. Osteogenic medium (α-MEM containing 10% FBS, 1% P/S, 0.1 mM L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, 20 mM beta-glycerophosphate, and 200 nM Dexamethasone, from Sigma-Aldrich), together with CM from corresponding cells, was added into each well (2 mL, ratio 1:1) of the positive control, AFC group, CEPC group, and NPC group. The negative control was cultured in the basal medium without additional factors. The medium was refreshed twice a week (Figure 2).

2.4. RNA Extraction and Relative Gene Expression Using qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from human OB/MSC cells cultured with donor-matched IVDs’ conditioned medium on Day 10, evaluating bone-related genes expression, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), osteopontin (official name is secreted phosphoprotein 1, SPP1), osterix (official name is transcription factor SP7, SP7), osteocalcin (official name is bone gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing protein, BGLAP), and COL1A2. The BMP antagonists (Noggin, Chordin, and Gremlin1) were also measured at this time point. As a marker of cell phenotype of primary cells, the gene expression of COL2A1 was also investigated, which should be high in NPC and CEPC but should be absent in OB and low or absent in MSC [22]. The relative gene expression was normalized to the positive control. Cells from the same donor were collected for RNA extraction to compare the expression of Noggin between human OB/MSC and IVD, and the result in IVD was relative to the control (OB/MSC). The isolated RNA underwent conversion to cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (#4368814; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Reinach, Switzerland). The cDNA was then mixed with iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (#1725122; Bio-Rad Inc., Cressier, Switzerland) and human-specific oligonucleotide primers sourced from Table 3. Subsequently, quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was conducted using the CFX96™ Real-Time System (#185-5096; Bio-Rad Inc., Cressier, Switzerland). Relative gene expression was analyzed by the application of the threshold cycle using the 2−ΔΔCt method [23]. The ribosomal 18S RNA and GAPDH genes were used as reference genes.

2.5. Alkaline Phosphatase Activity

After ten days of osteogenic differentiation, the medium in the human OB/MSC was removed, and cell layers were washed with tris-buffered saline (TBS). CelLytic (Sigma-Aldrich) was then used for cell lysis, followed by two rounds of 15s of ultrasonication for each sample. Then, they were centrifuged at 500× g for 10 min at 4 °C to obtain the supernatant. The ALP activity was quantified using a phosphatase assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and absorbance was measured under 405 nm by using a microplate reader (SpectraMax M5, Bucher Biotec, Basel, Switzerland).

2.6. Histology

Alizarin red staining was utilized to detect the mineralized matrix in human OBs/MSCs after osteogenic differentiation. Initial fixation of cells was conducted overnight using 4% formaldehyde, followed by two rinses with distilled water. Subsequently, all wells were exposed to a 2% alizarin red solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 45 min. Finally, the solution was aspirated, and the residual dye was washed away with PBS before capturing microscopic images.

2.7. Statistics

The results of relative gene expression and ALP activity were evaluated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. All experiments were performed in triplicates. The statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) software, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. N = number of biological replicates is indicated in all graphs.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of CM from Human IVD on Autologous OB and MSC Differentiation

After 10 days of culture, ALP activity was measured in MSC (Figure 3A). In the positive control, ALP activity was found to be 193.90 ± 60.65 mU/mL. This was significantly higher than the negative control (13.36 ± 8.40 mU/mL, p < 0.0001). The culture of MSC with the CM from CEPC or NPC resulted in a significant decrease in ALP activity (p = 0.0056 and p = 0.0162, respectively). However, treatment with the CM from AFC did not have inhibitory effects on ALP activity compared to that of the positive control (p = 0.9790). Similarly, ALP activity was decreased in OBs that were treated with the CM from IVD cells (Figure 3C). In addition, compared with the AFC and CEPC groups, the decrease in ALP activity in the NPC group was the most significant (p = 0.0248 for AFC group, p = 0.0022 for CEPC group, and p < 0.0001 for NPC group compared with the positive control). Much of the ALP activity of human MSCs or OBs was suppressed when the CM from the donor-matched IVD was added to the culture. Alizarin red staining on Day 21 showed less calcium deposit in MSCs and OBs treated with the donor-matched IVD CM (Figure 3B,D). This result was congruent with the result of the ALP assay on Day 10. Both results from the human MSCs and OBs revealed that their osteogenesis was negatively affected by secreted molecules from autologous IVD.

3.2. Gene Expression in Human MSCs and OBs upon Stimulation with CM

To investigate the impact of the CM derived from the autologous IVD on the expression of bone-related genes (ALP, RUNX2, BGLAP, SP7, SPP1, COL1A2) and BMP antagonists (Noggin, Gremlin1, Chordin) on Day 10, we performed qPCR analysis on experimental groups and control groups, and the results were presented as fold changes compared to the positive control. Under the influence of the CM, alterations in gene expression profiles were observed in MSCs. Notably, ALP, RUNX2, and SP7 maintained varying degrees of reduced expression levels (Figure 4A,B,D), signifying their response to the applied perturbation. Among them, when the CEPC CM was added, the expression levels of the above three genes were reduced. In contrast, after adding the AFC CM, only the expression of ALP decreased (Figure 4A). Similarly, only the expression of RUNX2 was observed to be inhibited when the NPC CM was added (Figure 4B). These observations suggest that ALP, RUNX2, and SP7 may be particularly influenced by factors associated with the CM derived from the autologous IVD. However, the gene expression of other bone-related genes, like BGLAP, SPP1, and COL1A2, distinct from ALP, RUNX2, and SP7, was not affected by the CM (Figure 4C,E,F). No significant reduction in all of them was found compared to the positive control, indicating a potential resistance to the interference represented by the CM. To assess the expression of BMP antagonists of human MSCs in response to the autologous CM from IVD, we examined the gene expression profiles of three BMP antagonists: Noggin, Gremlin1, and Chordin. Surprisingly, our analysis revealed that the gene expression levels of all three BMP antagonists remained unaltered in the presence of the CM, as compared to the positive control (Figure 4G–I). Compared to MSCs, OBs also exhibited almost similar results in the gene expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists when cultured with the CM derived from the autologous IVD. The stimulation of the human primary OBs with the CM did not decrease the gene expression of bone-related genes after 10 days (Figure 5A–F). The same result could also be observed in BMP antagonists, and no significant differences were found compared to the positive control (Figure 5G–I). In summary, there was a decrease in gene expression for a subset of the tested genes when CM derived from the autologous IVD was added, as compared to the positive control. However, most of the results showed no significant change for ten days’ culture with CM, either in human primary MSCs or OBs.

3.3. Noggin Expression in Human Primary OB, MSC, and IVD from Same Patient

To gain additional insight into the outcome of the ALP assay and alizarin red staining, we conducted qPCR of human MSCs, OBs, as well as the three predominant cell types within the donor-matched IVD, namely, AFC, CEPC, and NPC, and we elucidate the inhibitory effect on the osteogenesis of human primary MSC/OB following the culture with the CM derived from the autologous IVD. Subsequently, the relative expression levels of Noggin, one of important BMP antagonists, was quantified. The result showed that the average expression of Noggin in IVD was mainly increased compared to the autologous human primary MSCs (Figure 6A). However, among the tested AFC from five donors, the expression level of Noggin in three donors was relatively lower than that of MSC. Congruent results were found in the NPC group. There were two donors below baseline and the expression level of Noggin in the MSC. In contrast, a little different from the result of Noggin in the MSC and the corresponding IVD, a strong expression of Noggin was observed in all cell types of the human IVD relative to the autologous OB, including all the tested donors (Figure 6B). These results reveal that the average expression of Noggin was upregulated in the human primary IVD relative to autologous MSCs or OBs.

4. Discussion

As a common health problem, LBP treatment involves a range of strategies, from conservative management to surgical interventions [24,25,26,27]. However, it is important to acknowledge the potential issues associated with surgical approaches because of non-fusion in up to 30% of the cases [28]. The efficacy of some surgical procedures for LBP remains a topic of debate [29]. Hence, finding the possible cause to solve the problem of non-union is necessary.
Li et al. [30] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of smoking on fusion rate in spinal fusion surgery. Smoking was considered an important factor and led to a poor outcome. Moreover, patients with osteoporosis are at a greater risk of non-fusion due to compromised bone quality and reduced bone density [31]. Several articles also discovered that Diabetes mellitus could affect bone healing because insulin is considered a key molecule in bone metabolism and growth after spinal fusion [32,33]. Importantly, the residual human IVD tissue that was possibly left behind after the removal of the IVD, or even the fact that the “IVD-niche” is absolutely not osteoinductive, might affect the outcome and successful ossification of spinal fusion [13]. Previous research by our group showed that the human IVD was potentially associated with inhibiting the osteogenesis of primary osteoblasts in a porous-membrane-separated co-culture system [11]. These studies provide insights into the impact of retained IVD tissue or cells. As for how residual disc tissue affects spinal fusion, the mechanism is not fully understood.
We collected postoperative human IVD tissue, bone fragments, and bone marrow from the same patients and found that the CM derived from IVD cells could inhibit the ALP activity and calcium deposit formation of autologous OBs at the protein level and histology (Figure 3C,D). It means residual disc tissue may secrete a cocktail of molecules into the CM, including numerous soluble factors and extracellular vesicles, and they suppress the formation of a new bone at the original disc space after spinal surgery. From the results in Figure 3, all main cell types of the human IVD have a similar effect on autologous OBs by the CM. We can speculate that these molecules that inhibit OBs are secreted into the CM by each cell type. Interestingly, the human bone-marrow-derived MSC, potentially differentiating into OBs, was measured, and exhibited similar results as the OBs. This indicates that these molecules from the CM also show an inhibition on the osteogenesis of MSCs. Recent studies have shown that the molecules naturally released from cells have a lot of capabilities: anti-inflammation or pro-inflammation, pro-angiogenesis, regeneration, and tissue repair [16,34,35,36]. Yang et al. found that murine macrophages RAW 264.7 cultured in the CM of Rat AFC or NPC increased the levels of inflammatory cytokines [34]. This confirms that the CM derived from IVDs can indeed affect the biological behavior of other cells. In our study, both the human OBs and MSCs were observed not to follow an expected behavior for osteogenesis when cultured with the CM derived from an autologous IVD. This is a little different from the present data about the effect of the CM on the IVD.
Usually, bone-related genes are important indicators of ossification. They reflect the activity of cells in promoting osteogenic differentiation to a certain extent [37,38,39]. After culturing MSCs for ten days using the CM derived from different cell types of an autologous human IVD, we found that in MSC, except for the expression of individual bone-related genes that was inhibited, the expression of most bone-related genes remained stable. The result does not match the previous result of ALP assay as well as alizarin red staining (Figure 3). We think that it may be due to insufficient cultivation time. Some bone-related genes need to be measured at an intermediate or late stage [40,41,42,43]. As for the expression in ALP, RUNX2, and SP7, it is unclear why only some groups have changes in gene expression and some do not, possibly because of limited donors (n = 3). Similarly, the result of human OBs in the bone-related genes expression is almost consistent with that of MSCs, with no significant changes recorded on Day 10. This suggests that residual disc tissue does not have enough negative impact on postoperative spinal fusion in the early stages. Importantly, a sufficient recovery time needs to be given when evaluating the effect of intervertebral fusion after spinal surgery. Early relevant indicators may not fully reflect the long-term postoperative healing. Relevant evidence can also be obtained from the expression of BMP antagonists in human MSCs and OBs (Figure 4G–I and Figure 5G–I). As important regulators of bone formation, the BMP antagonists can negatively regulate the downstream signaling of the BMP pathway by binding to BMP2, thereby inhibiting osteogenic differentiation [44].
In this study, we observed notably elevated levels of Noggin expression in three cell types of the human IVD (AFC, CEPC, and NPC) when compared to their autologous counterparts, namely, MSCs and OBs. This has a positive correlation with the inhibitory effect of the CM on osteogenesis. This differential expression of Noggin across these cell types holds significant implications and warrants further exploration. Noggin is a well-established antagonist of BMP, which is crucial for signaling molecules involved in the regulation of various cellular processes, including differentiation and tissue development [44]. The higher expression of Noggin in AFC, CEPC, and NPC may indicate a potential mechanism that Noggin is secreted into the CM by these cell types and inhibits BMP signaling by binding directly to BMP-2, preventing it from interacting with its cell surface receptors [45,46]. This interference blocks the downstream signaling cascade that leads autologous MSCs and OBs to osteogenic differentiation, thereby exerting control over their differentiation and functional properties. The findings demonstrate a specific regulatory role of Noggin derived from IVD cells in the cellular microenvironments nearby. Thus, the high expression level of Noggin in human IVD cells may be a potential inhibitor of autologous OBs and MSCs.
However, our research has some limitations. Noggin concentration in CM was not measured at the protein level this time. Proteomics via mass spectrometry of the CM could be performed in the future to investigate the precise and possible influence from other components in the CM on the experimental results. Furthermore, future research should concentrate on the specific composition of the IVD-derived CM. Thus, mass spectrometry of the proteome might shed new light into the factors that may be important here. Additionally, previous experiments have demonstrated the interplay between BMP2 stimulation and Noggin inhibitor in a dose-dependent manner [47]. Specific inhibition of the most important antagonists, like Noggin, Gremlin-1, or Chordin, by specific antibodies and a down-stream analysis of the SMAD signaling through Western blotting would provide key insights into the mechanism. Finally, the isolation of specific extracellular vesicles (EVs) from the CM of IVD cells might be of therapeutic value as an anti-osteoblastic drug where osteogenesis should be prevented such as in ectopic bone formation, for instance, in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) [48].
Finally, our current cell culture results confirmed previous evidence of high expression of BMP inhibitors in IVD cells. Thus, achieving better spinal fusion antagonists of inhibitors is also of a high interest. Here, L51P, a BMP2 analog with a leucine substitution at position 51 by proline, a molecule that binds to BMP inhibitors, is of high therapeutic value [49]. Recently, the effectiveness of three different ratios of BMP2/L51P mixtures was confirmed in an elderly rat animal study, and these mixtures clearly demonstrated strong ossification in a discectomy/spinal fusion model [50].

5. Conclusions

Our study revealed a distinctive difference in high Noggin expression in human AFC, CEPC, and NPC relative to autologous OBs and MSCs. These findings also demonstrated the involvement of human IVD cells-derived molecules, including Noggin, potentially in the regulation of autologous OBs and MSCs and the inhibition of osteogenesis in these cells through paracrine signaling. It offers an insight into the process of the osteogenesis and knockdown of Noggin in human IVD cells, possibly improving the postoperative spinal fusion. While these findings present promising avenues for therapeutic interventions, further research is needed to fully understand the potential regulatory mechanism. Importantly, the complete removal of the affected IVD during spinal surgery for LBP can effectively block the impact of IVD on osteogenesis, which plays a crucial role in postoperative intervertebral fusion.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/biomedicines12020376/s1, Figure S1: Col2/Col1 gene expression ratio of donor-matched primary cell types at passage 2–4 in OB, MSC, AFC, CEPC, and NPC. The graph clearly demonstrates that AFC, CEPC and NPC in increasing order do express higher levels of col2, which is absent in OBs and MSCs. Mean ± SD, n = 3 donors.

Author Contributions

S.C. and B.G. conceived and designed the experiments; S.C. performed the experiments; S.C., A.S.C., B.G. and Z.L. analyzed the data; S.B. and C.E.A. contributed donor tissue; S.C. and B.G. wrote the manuscript; B.G. provided funding; S.C. created the graphic arts. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

S.C. was supported by China Scholarship Council #202208170027.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study used human tissues and cells that were either approved under the general ethical consent of the Insel University hospital of Bern or by the Swissethics approval # 2019-00097.

Informed Consent Statement

All human donors have given written consent to this study.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this research are available on request from the first and corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and appreciate our team colleagues for their valuable suggestions and technical assistance for this study, namely, Andrea Oberli for her assistance in the experiments, and Paola Bermudez Lekerika and Katherine B. Crump for editing the manuscript and for valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vos, T.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Jiang, G.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ambrosio, L.; Mazzuca, G.; Maguolo, A.; Russo, F.; Cannata, F.; Vadalà, G.; Maffeis, C.; Papalia, R.; Denaro, V. The burden of low back pain in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity: From pathophysiology to prevention and treatment strategies. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2023, 15, 1759720X231188831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization Home Page. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions (accessed on 30 September 2023).
  4. Ferreira, M.L.; de Luca, K.; Haile, L.M.; Steinmetz, J.D.; Culbreth, G.T.; Cross, M.; Kopec, J.A.; Ferreira, P.H.; Blyth, F.M.; Buchbinder, R.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023, 5, e316–e329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Adams, M.A.; Dolan, P. Intervertebral disc degeneration: Evidence for two distinct phenotypes. J. Anat. 2012, 221, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tu, J.; Li, W.; Yang, S.; Yang, P.; Yan, Q.; Wang, S.; Lai, K.; Bai, X.; Wu, C.; Ding, W.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling Reveals Multicellular Ecosystem of Nucleus Pulposus during Degeneration Progression. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, e2103631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tanaka, T.; Takahashi, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Saito, M.; Xiaolong, S.; Jingquan, C.; Ito, Y.; Kato, T.; Ochi, H.; Sato, S.; et al. Foxf2 represses bone formation via Wnt2b/β-catenin signaling. Exp. Mol. Med. 2022, 54, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Martin, B.I.; Mirza, S.K.; Comstock, B.A.; Gray, D.T.; Kreuter, W.; Deyo, R.A. Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Spine Surgery and the Influence of Spinal Fusion Procedures. Spine 2007, 32, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rajaee, S.S.; Kanim, L.E.A.; Bae, H.W. National trends in revision spinal fusion in the USA: Patient characteristics and complications. Bone Jt. J. 2014, 96-B, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Çakmak, A.S.; Fuerkaiti, S.; Karagüzel, D.; Karaaslan, Ç.; Gümüşderelioğlu, M. Enhanced Osteogenic Potential of Noggin Knockout C2C12 Cells on BMP-2 Releasing Silk Scaffolds. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 6175–6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. May, R.D.; Frauchiger, D.A.; Albers, C.E.; Benneker, L.M.; Kohl, S.; Gantenbein, B. Inhibitory Effects of Human Primary Intervertebral Disc Cells on Human Primary Osteoblasts in a Co-Culture System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chan, S.C.W.; Tekari, A.; Benneker, L.M.; Heini, P.F.; Gantenbein, B. Osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells is hindered by the presence of intervertebral disc cells. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 18, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tekari, A.; May, R.D.; Frauchiger, D.A.; Chan, S.C.; Benneker, L.M.; Gantenbein, B. The BMP2 variant L51P restores the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells in the presence of intervertebral disc cells. Eur. Cells Mater. 2017, 33, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. May, R.D.; Frauchiger, D.A.; Albers, C.E.; Tekari, A.; Benneker, L.M.; Klenke, F.M.; Hofstetter, W.; Gantenbein, B. Application of Cytokines of the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) Family in Spinal Fusion—Effects on the Bone, Intervertebral Disc and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 14, 618–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Piazza, N.; Dehghani, M.; Gaborski, T.R.; Wuertz-Kozak, K. Therapeutic Potential of Extracellular Vesicles in Degenerative Diseases of the Intervertebral Disc. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chen, W.; Sun, Y.; Gu, X.; Cai, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Hao, Y.; Chen, S. Conditioned medium of human bone marrow-derived stem cells promotes tendon-bone healing of the rotator cuff in a rat model. Biomaterials 2021, 271, 120714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Md Fadilah, N.I.; Mohd Abdul Kader Jailani, M.S.; Badrul Hisham, M.A.I.; Sunthar Raj, N.; Shamsuddin, S.A.; Ng, M.H.; Fauzi, M.B.; Maarof, M. Cell secretomes for wound healing and tissue regeneration: Next generation acellular based tissue engineered products. J. Tissue Eng. 2022, 13, 20417314221114273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sinkemani, A.; Wang, F.; Xie, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C.; Wu, X. Nucleus Pulposus Cell Conditioned Medium Promotes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation into Nucleus Pulposus-Like Cells under Hypoxic Conditions. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 8882549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stoyanov, J.V.; Gantenbein-Ritter, B.; Bertolo, A.; Aebli, N.; Baur, M.; Alini, M.; Grad, S. Role of hypoxia and growth and differentiation factor-5 on differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells towards intervertebral nucleus pulposus-like cells. Eur. Cell Mater. 2011, 21, 533–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Solchaga, L.A.; Penick, K.; Porter, J.D.; Goldberg, V.M.; Caplan, A.I.; Welter, J.F. FGF-2 enhances the mitotic and chondrogenic potentials of human adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2005, 203, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Risbud, M.V.; Schoepflin, Z.R.; Mwale, F.; Kandel, R.A.; Grad, S.; Iatridis, J.C.; Sakai, D.; Hoyland, J.A. Defining the phenotype of young healthy nucleus pulposus cells: Recommendations of the Spine Research Interest Group at the 2014 annual ORS meeting. J. Orthop. Res. 2015, 33, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Knezevic, N.N.; Candido, K.D.; Vlaeyen, J.W.S.; Van Zundert, J.; Cohen, S.P. Low back pain. Lancet 2021, 398, 78–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jones, C.M.P.; Day, R.O.; Koes, B.W.; Latimer, J.; Maher, C.G.; McLachlan, A.J.; Billot, L.; Shan, S.; Lin, C.-W.C. Opioid analgesia for acute low back pain and neck pain (the OPAL trial): A randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2023, 402, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bagg, M.K.; Wand, B.M.; Cashin, A.G.; Lee, H.; Hübscher, M.; Stanton, T.R.; O’Connell, N.E.; O’Hagan, E.T.; Rizzo, R.R.N.; Wewege, M.A.; et al. Effect of Graded Sensorimotor Retraining on Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2022, 328, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chou, R. Low Back Pain. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, ITC113–ITC128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, L.; Xie, T.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Pu, X.; Lu, Y.; Song, Y.; Zeng, J. Comparing the medium-term outcomes of lumbar interbody fusion via transforaminal and oblique approach in treating lumbar degenerative disc diseases. Spine J. 2022, 22, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Mohd Isa, I.L.; Mokhtar, S.A.; Abbah, S.A.; Fauzi, M.B.; Devitt, A.; Pandit, A. Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering Strategies toward Precision Medicine. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2022, 11, e2102530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Li, Y.; Zheng, L.-M.; Zhang, Z.-W.; He, C.-J. The Effect of Smoking on the Fusion Rate of Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021, 154, e222–e235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Govindarajan, V.; Diaz, A.; Perez-Roman, R.J.; Burks, S.S.; Wang, M.Y.; Levi, A.D. Osteoporosis treatment in patients undergoing spinal fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg. Focus 2021, 50, E9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. NaPier, Z.; Kanim, L.E.A.; Nelson, T.J.; Salehi, K.; Arabi, Y.; Glaeser, J.D.; Sheyn, D.; Metzger, M.F. The effect of insulin dependent diabetes on bone metabolism and growth after spinal fusion. Spine J. 2020, 20, 800–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bhamb, N.; Kanim, L.E.A.; Maldonado, R.C.; Nelson, T.J.; Salehi, K.; Glaeser, J.D.; Metzger, M.F. The impact of type 2 diabetes on bone metabolism and growth after spinal fusion. Spine J. 2019, 19, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, H.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; He, D.; Xing, Y.; An, Y.; Tian, W. Secreted Factors From Intervertebral Disc Cells and Infiltrating Macrophages Promote Degenerated Intervertebral Disc Catabolism. Spine 2019, 44, E520–E529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, H.; He, B. SDF1/CXCR4 axis plays a role in angiogenesis during the degeneration of intervertebral discs. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 1203–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sakai, D.; Andersson, G.B.J. Stem cell therapy for intervertebral disc regeneration: Obstacles and solutions. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shu, H.S.; Liu, Y.L.; Tang, X.T.; Zhang, X.S.; Zhou, B.; Zou, W.; Zhou, B.O. Tracing the skeletal progenitor transition during postnatal bone formation. Cell Stem Cell 2021, 28, 2122–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Maduranga Karunarathne, W.A.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Park, S.R.; Lee, C.-M.; Kim, G.-Y. Bisphenol A inhibits osteogenic activity and causes bone resorption via the activation of retinoic acid-related orphan receptor α. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Diallo, A.M.; Rota, S.; Boissière, M.; Bardonnet, R.; Pauthe, E.; Petite, H.; Benoist, H.M.; Bensidhoum, M.; Anagnostou, F. Osteoformation potential of an allogenic partially demineralized bone matrix in critical-size defects in the rat calvarium. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 127, 112207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Nakashima, K.; Zhou, X.; Kunkel, G.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, J.M.; Behringer, R.R.; de Crombrugghe, B. The novel zinc finger-containing transcription factor osterix is required for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Cell 2002, 108, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ducy, P.; Desbois, C.; Boyce, B.; Pinero, G.; Story, B.; Dunstan, C.; Smith, E.; Bonadio, J.; Goldstein, S.; Gundberg, C.; et al. Increased bone formation in osteocalcin-deficient mice. Nature 1996, 382, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Denhardt, D.T.; Noda, M.; O’Regan, A.W.; Pavlin, D.; Berman, J.S. Osteopontin as a means to cope with environmental insults: Regulation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cell survival. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 1055–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roberts, S.J.; van Gastel, N.; Carmeliet, G.; Luyten, F.P. Uncovering the periosteum for skeletal regeneration: The stem cell that lies beneath. Bone 2015, 70, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guasto, A.; Cormier-Daire, V. Signaling Pathways in Bone Development and Their Related Skeletal Dysplasia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cornejo, M.C.; Cho, S.K.; Giannarelli, C.; Iatridis, J.C.; Purmessur, D. Soluble factors from the notochordal-rich intervertebral disc inhibit endothelial cell invasion and vessel formation in the presence and absence of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2015, 23, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Purmessur, D.; Guterl, C.C.; Cho, S.K.; Cornejo, M.C.; Lam, Y.W.; Ballif, B.A.; Laudier, J.C.I.; Iatridis, J.C. Dynamic pressurization induces transition of notochordal cells to a mature phenotype while retaining production of important patterning ligands from development. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2013, 15, R122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Albers, C.E.; Hofstetter, W.; Sebald, H.-J.; Sebald, W.; Siebenrock, K.A.; Klenke, F.M. L51P—A BMP2 variant with osteoinductive activity via inhibition of Noggin. Bone 2012, 51, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nguyen, T.C.T.; Yahara, Y.; Yasuda, T.; Seki, S.; Suzuki, K.; Watanabe, K.; Makino, H.; Kamei, K.; Mori, K.; Kawaguchi, Y. Morphological characteristics of DISH in patients with OPLL and its association with high-sensitivity CRP: Inflammatory DISH. Rheumatology 2022, 61, 3981–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. May, R.D.; Frauchiger, D.A.; Albers, C.E.; Hofstetter, W.; Gantenbein, B. Exogenous Stimulation of Human Intervertebral Disc Cells in 3-Dimensional Alginate Bead Culture with BMP2 and L51P: Cytocompatibility and Effects on Cell Phenotype. Neurospine 2020, 17, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gantenbein, B.; Oswald, K.A.C.; Erbach, G.F.; Croft, A.S.; Bermudez-Lekerika, P.; Strunz, F.; Bigdon, S.F.; Albers, C.E. The Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Analogue L51P Enhances Spinal Fusion in Combination with BMP2 in an In Vivo Rat Tail Model. Acta Biomater. 2024; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 12 00376 g001
Figure 1. Experimental design for the human OB or MSC cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells. Bone fragments, bone marrow, and IVD tissue samples from spinal surgery were separated to obtain human OBs, MSCs, and the main three types of cells in IVD, including AFC, CEPC, and NPC. To produce the CM of IVD cells, the AFC, CEPC, and NPC were embedded in 3D alginate beads and cultured in the medium. CM from different cell types was collected every three days and added into the autologous OB or MSC in 12-well plate.
Figure 1. Experimental design for the human OB or MSC cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells. Bone fragments, bone marrow, and IVD tissue samples from spinal surgery were separated to obtain human OBs, MSCs, and the main three types of cells in IVD, including AFC, CEPC, and NPC. To produce the CM of IVD cells, the AFC, CEPC, and NPC were embedded in 3D alginate beads and cultured in the medium. CM from different cell types was collected every three days and added into the autologous OB or MSC in 12-well plate.
Biomedicines 12 00376 g001
Biomedicines 12 00376 g002
Figure 2. All the five experimental groups were cultured in osteogenic medium except for the negative control. The group added the conditioned medium from human OBs or MSCs was regarded as positive control.
Figure 2. All the five experimental groups were cultured in osteogenic medium except for the negative control. The group added the conditioned medium from human OBs or MSCs was regarded as positive control.
Biomedicines 12 00376 g002
Biomedicines 12 00376 g003
Figure 3. The osteogenesis of human OB/MSC was inhibited after culture with CM from autologous IVD cells. (A,C) ALP assay showed ALP activity significantly decreased when adding CM from IVD cells into autologous OB and MSC to culture for 10 days. (B,D) A trend of lower calcium deposit could be observed on Day 21 using alizarin red staining after OBs and MSCs were cultured with CM from different autologous IVD cells. (Calcium deposits: Bright orange red; Scale bar, 100 µm. Mean ± SD. p-value, ns > 0.05; * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; **** < 0.0001; n = 3–5.)
Figure 3. The osteogenesis of human OB/MSC was inhibited after culture with CM from autologous IVD cells. (A,C) ALP assay showed ALP activity significantly decreased when adding CM from IVD cells into autologous OB and MSC to culture for 10 days. (B,D) A trend of lower calcium deposit could be observed on Day 21 using alizarin red staining after OBs and MSCs were cultured with CM from different autologous IVD cells. (Calcium deposits: Bright orange red; Scale bar, 100 µm. Mean ± SD. p-value, ns > 0.05; * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; **** < 0.0001; n = 3–5.)
Biomedicines 12 00376 g003
Biomedicines 12 00376 g004
Figure 4. The relative gene expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists after human MSC cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells on Day 10. (A–F) The relative gene expression of bone-related genes was significantly downregulated after adding CM into the autologous MSC but mostly remained unchanged. (G–I) Relative gene expression of BMP antagonists when cultured with CM for ten days, and no significant changes were noticed. (Mean ± SD, the data were normalized to positive control, p-value, * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; n = 3–5.)
Figure 4. The relative gene expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists after human MSC cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells on Day 10. (A–F) The relative gene expression of bone-related genes was significantly downregulated after adding CM into the autologous MSC but mostly remained unchanged. (G–I) Relative gene expression of BMP antagonists when cultured with CM for ten days, and no significant changes were noticed. (Mean ± SD, the data were normalized to positive control, p-value, * < 0.05; ** < 0.01; n = 3–5.)
Biomedicines 12 00376 g004
Biomedicines 12 00376 g005
Figure 5. The relative gene expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists after human OB cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells on Day 10. (A–F) The relative gene expression of bone-related genes in OB had no change after adding CM inside. (G–I) Compared to the positive control, the gene expression of BMP antagonists in experimental groups, AFC, CEPC, and NPC groups, was relatively stable. (Mean ± SD, the data were normalized to positive control, p-value; n = 3–5.)
Figure 5. The relative gene expression of bone-related genes and BMP antagonists after human OB cultured with CM from autologous IVD cells on Day 10. (A–F) The relative gene expression of bone-related genes in OB had no change after adding CM inside. (G–I) Compared to the positive control, the gene expression of BMP antagonists in experimental groups, AFC, CEPC, and NPC groups, was relatively stable. (Mean ± SD, the data were normalized to positive control, p-value; n = 3–5.)
Biomedicines 12 00376 g005
Biomedicines 12 00376 g006
Figure 6. The average expression of Noggin was mainly higher in all cell types of human IVD compared to autologous OB, as well as MSC. (A) Compared to autologous MSC, the expression of Noggin in human IVD increased. (B) The same result could be observed significantly between human IVD and corresponding OB. (For MSC and OB, shown are the means, the data were normalized to MSC/OB group, n = 3–5).
Figure 6. The average expression of Noggin was mainly higher in all cell types of human IVD compared to autologous OB, as well as MSC. (A) Compared to autologous MSC, the expression of Noggin in human IVD increased. (B) The same result could be observed significantly between human IVD and corresponding OB. (For MSC and OB, shown are the means, the data were normalized to MSC/OB group, n = 3–5).
Biomedicines 12 00376 g006
Table 1. The details of human donors for culture with conditioned medium from autologous IVD.
Table 1. The details of human donors for culture with conditioned medium from autologous IVD.
DonorPatient BirthSexTypeIVD
Tissues		LevelBone MarrowBone
Fragments
11988FT√T12-L1x√
21988MT√L1-L2x√
31950FT√L1-L2x√
41985FT√T12-L1x√
51946M-√L3-L4√x
61961M-√L3-L4√x
71988MT√L1-L2√x
Donor’s list of IVD tissues, bone marrow, and bone fragments for the culture experiments with conditioned medium. F, female; M, male; T, trauma; -, missing information; √, collected; x, not collected.
Table 2. The details of donors for comparison of Noggin expression between IVD and autologous MSCs/OBs.
Table 2. The details of donors for comparison of Noggin expression between IVD and autologous MSCs/OBs.
DonorPatient BirthSexTypeIVD
Tissues		LevelBone MarrowBone
Fragments
11988MT√L1-L2x√
21950FT√L1-L2x√
31985FT√T12-L1x√
41947FT√L1-L2x√
51946M-√L3-L4√x
61961M-√L3-L4√x
71988MT√L1-L2√x
81994MT√T12-L1√x
91947FT√L1-L2√x
F, female; M, male; T, trauma; -, missing information; √, collected; x, not collected.
Table 3. Human gene primers for qPCR.
Table 3. Human gene primers for qPCR.
GeneAccession No.Forward SequenceReverse Sequence
18SNR_145820.1CGA TGC GGC GG
C GTT ATT C		TCT GTC AAT CCT G
TC CGT GTC C
GAPDHNM_001289745.2ATC TTC CAG GA
G CGA GAT		GGA GGC ATT GCT
GAT GAT
ALPNM_001177520.3GTA TGA GAG TG
A CGA GAA		AAT AGG TAG TCC
ACA TTG T
RUNX2NM_001024630AGC AGC ACT CC
A TAT CTC T		TTC CAT CAG CGT
CAA CAC
SPP1NM_001251830.1ACG CCG ACC AA
G GAA AAC TC		GTC CAT AAA CCA
CAC TAT CAC CTC G
BGLAPNM_199173.5GCA GAG TCC AG
C AAA GGT G		CCA GCC ATT GAT
ACA GGT AGC
SP7NM_001173467.3CAG GCT ATG CT
A ATG ATT ACC		GGC AGA CAG TCA
GAA GAG
COL1A2NM_000089.3GTG GCA GTG AT
G GAA GTG		CAC CAG TAA GGC
CGT TTG
COL2A1XM_017018831.3AGC AGC AAG AGC AAG GAG AAGTA GGA AGG TCA TCT GGA
NOGNM_001078309.1CAG CAC TAT CT
C CAC ATC CG		CAG CAG CGT CTC
GTT CAG
GREM1NM_001191322.1GAG AAG ACG AC
G AGA GTA AGG AA		CCA ACC AGT AGC
AGA TGA ACA G
CHRDXM_017007394.1GCC TCC GCT TCT
CTA TCT		AAC AGG ACA CTG
CCA TTG
18S, reference gene 18S; GAPDH, reference gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; RUNX2, runt-related transcription factor 2; SPP1, osteopontin, secreted Phosphoprotein 1; BGLAP, osteocalcin, bone gamma-carboxyglutamate protein; SP7, osterix, Sp7 transcription factor; COL1A2, collagen 1 A2; COL2A1, collagen 2 A1; GREM1, gremlin 1; NOG, noggin; CHRD, chordin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, S.; Croft, A.S.; Bigdon, S.; Albers, C.E.; Li, Z.; Gantenbein, B. Conditioned Medium of Intervertebral Disc Cells Inhibits Osteo-Genesis on Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Osteoblasts. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 376. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biomedicines12020376

AMA Style

Chen S, Croft AS, Bigdon S, Albers CE, Li Z, Gantenbein B. Conditioned Medium of Intervertebral Disc Cells Inhibits Osteo-Genesis on Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Osteoblasts. Biomedicines. 2024; 12(2):376. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biomedicines12020376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Shuimu, Andreas S. Croft, Sebastian Bigdon, Christoph E. Albers, Zhen Li, and Benjamin Gantenbein. 2024. "Conditioned Medium of Intervertebral Disc Cells Inhibits Osteo-Genesis on Autologous Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Osteoblasts" Biomedicines 12, no. 2: 376. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biomedicines12020376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop