Next Article in Journal
Asymmetric Hysteresis Loops in Structured Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles with Hard/Soft Areas
Next Article in Special Issue
Lignin Nanoparticles: A Promising Tool to Improve Maize Physiological, Biochemical, and Chemical Traits
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Smart Lubricant-Infused Surfaces for Droplet Manipulation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chitosan–Selenium Nanoparticle (Cs–Se NP) Foliar Spray Alleviates Salt Stress in Bitter Melon
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Carboxymethylcellulose Copper-Montmorillonite Nanocomposite for Controlling the Infection of Erwinia carotovora in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

1
Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
2
Agribusiness Centre, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
3
Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
4
Department of Agricultural Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
5
Department of Agronomy, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
6
Department of Plant Physiology, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia
7
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic
8
Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 February 2021 / Revised: 13 March 2021 / Accepted: 18 March 2021 / Published: 21 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Influence of Nanoparticles on Plants: The Pros and Cons)

Abstract

:
A novel antimicrobial formulation based on carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) spray-coated Cu2+ intercalated montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposite material was prepared and its morphology, internal structure, and bonding interactions were studied. Meanwhile, the antibacterial efficacy and release behavior of Cu2+ was also determined. PXRD patterns indicated the intercalation of Cu2+, while FTIR spectra and TGA traces confirmed the association of Cu−MMT with CMC. SEM study revealed the improvement of nanocomposites by CMC, without disturbing the clay structure. TEM and EDAX studies indicated the distribution of Cu (copper) throughout the composite. In vitro antibacterial assays performed with Erwinia carotovora revealed effective bacterial growth suppression, indicating the potential of this material in controlling soft rot of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum); also observed was a connection between growth inhibition and concentration of CMC spray coats indicating a positive relationship between Cu2+ release and concentration of the CMC coatings. The activity pattern of the nanocomposite displayed a significant degree of sustained-release behavior.

1. Introduction

Nanoscience-based products and applications have fetched a greater attention in a range of fields including the biocide industry. Cu is a major active ingredient of chemicals with cidal effects because it is effective against numerous plant and mammalian diseases [1,2]. The use of Cu in agricultural applications goes back to the 19th century. Inorganic Cu compounds with fungicidal and bactericidal properties, and as fertilizer additives are very popular due to their low cost [3]. Another advantage possessed by copper is that bacteria and fungi cannot build up resistance against it as they do with antibiotics and synthetic fungicides that are organic in origin. Among the Cu based biocides, Cu(NO3)2, CuSO4.5H2O, Cu(OCl)2, Cu(OH)2, and Cu2O are more common, with the metallic copper content of commercial formulations being generally in the range of 5–85% [4]. In bacterial cells, Cu2+ causes membrane damage and loss of cell integrity.
Bacterial diseases have gained greater attention in crop agriculture. Soft rot caused by Erwinia sp. is one of the serious diseases that affect many agriculturally important crops [5,6,7]. Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica van Hall [8] and Dye [9,10,11] and Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora Jones [12]; Bergey et al. [13] are considered as important plant pathogenic species of the genus Erwinia [5], and these subspecies are considered as the main source of primary inoculum for soft rot of potato (S. tuberosum) [5]. Lack of effective control strategies to protect potatoes in the field or during storage has hindered all efforts at inoculation, and therefore the use of non-contaminated planting material has been identified as one of the better control strategies [14].
Recent research showed that by planting cut potato tuber pieces of 60 g each (optimum size), it is possible to generate better harvests with very high marketable yields in Sri Lanka [15]. However, cutting the tubers results in exposing a considerable surface area of wounded tissues that attract plant pathogenic fungi and bacteria. Therefore, in general, it is advised to store the cut tubers for a couple of days to allow them to develop the corky layer that prevents infection by pathogens; this is followed by dipping the pieces in a suitable fungicide before planting in the soil. Whereas there is a remedy for fungi by treating the planting material with fungicides, there is no particular method to control bacteria such as Erwinia.
The uncontrolled release into the environment after the application is a major problem associated with the use of most pesticides. This results in the accumulation of toxic residues and/or heavy metals in the soil and water bodies [16]. In general, 60–70% of the pesticides do not reach the target objects and are removed through leaching, volatilization, immobilization, and erosion [17]. Some of these pollutants are heavy metal-based chemicals that tend to accumulate in the environment, with Cu being one such important heavy metal [18,19,20]. The presence of excess Cu has detrimental effects on many organisms as has been emphasized by many researchers [21,22,23,24,25]. However, copper is considered less toxic to humans compared to other heavy metals like cadmium, lead, and mercury [26]. All the same, improving release properties through the formulation of any pesticide plays a major role in combatting such negative impacts. Among such attempts, incorporation of clay and/or polymer matrices together with the active ingredients is one of the widely researched methods.
Clay minerals possess good adsorption properties, cation exchange capacity (CEC) and also facilitate controlled delivery [27]. Antibacterial activity of metal exchanged montmorillonite composites such as Cu−MMT [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], Ag-MMT [29,34], and Zn−MMT [29] have been studied by various researchers. MMT-metal ion composites associated with polymers or resins have also been synthesized and tested [35]. Additionally, other Cu forms such as CuO [36,37] and Cu2O [38], intercalated with MMT have also been studied for the same purposes. However, these studies were based on human and animal pathogenic bacteria like Escherichia spp., and mesophilic bacteria—such as Pseudomonas spp., Streptococcus spp., and Salmonella spp.—and not on plant pathogenic bacteria.
Through the current study, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) spray-coated Cu2+ intercalated, MMT nanocomposites were prepared and the prepared nanocomposites were fully characterized in terms of their internal structural properties and morphology using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermal analysis using thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition to that, in-vitro antibacterial efficacy against Erwinia carotovora was also determined using two experiments. Finally, the release behavior of one composite was studied in sandy soil. CMC was selected because it is a biodegradable polymer that can trigger the sustained release of active ingredients. Employing biodegradable polymers such as carboxymethylcellulose has drawn significant attention compared to synthetic petroleum-derived polymers because biodegradable polymers are less toxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable. Studies have claimed that polymer encapsulated formulations are more effective in terms of extended activity than non-encapsulated forms as encapsulation reduces the losses caused by unwanted release [39] whilst the clay component in the composite improves the structural properties of the nanocomposite [40].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Cu2+ Exchanged MMT (Cu-MMT)

A portion of 9 g of Na−MMT (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were weighed and mixed with 200 mL of 0.05 M CuSO4.5H2O (Sigma-Aldrich) solution at room temperature (25 °C) and after stirring the mixture was kept overnight. The resulting solution was centrifuged for 20 min at 5000 rpm. Then it was decanted, and the remaining solid material was washed three times with distilled water. Following this, the material was oven-dried for 6 h at 80 °C. After drying it, a sample of the Cu-MMT was analyzed for the percentage of copper by weight using a Thermo Scientific ICE 3500 atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS).

2.2. Preparation of CMC Spray-Coated Cu-MMT Nanocomposites

CMC (CDH laboratories, New Delhi, India: Viscosity 1% at 25 °C, 1200–2400 cps) at different concentrations, specifically 2.5, 5 and 7.5 g/L were prepared using distilled water heated up to 80 °C. After adding CMC, the solution was continuously stirred for 2 h and then cooled down to room temperature. The three solutions at room temperature were poured into a spray gun in turn. Prepared Cu−MMT from each composite was spread on Petri dishes (2.5 g each) uniformly. Each Petri dish with Cu−MMT was sprayed with different strengths of the CMC solutions while slightly shaking the dishes. After spraying, the composites were kept in a drying oven at 60 °C for 6 h to remove moisture.

2.3. Characterization

2.3.1. Structural Properties

PXRD patterns of all synthesized samples were recorded using a Bruker D8 Focus X-ray powder diffractometer using Cu K radiation (=0.154 nm) over a 2θ range of 3–65° with a step size of 0.02° and a step time of 1s. The nature of chemical bonding of the synthesized samples was determined using a Bruker Vertex 80 FTIR spectrometer, by spanning the range from 600 to 4000 cm−1 using the attenuated total reflectance technique. The thermal behavior of the synthesized samples was studied by performing TGA (TA Instruments SDTQ600). The samples (10–15 mg) were heated from ambient temperature to 100 °C (ramp 10 °C/min) in a nitrogen environment (100 cm3/min N2 flow rate). The particle size and the morphology of the synthesized samples were studied using a HITACHI SU6600 SEM and Philips CM30 TEM and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX).

2.3.2. Antibacterial Properties

Experiment 1: Bacterial Growth Inhibition Test

In-vitro antibacterial activity was assessed using gram-negative bacterium Erwinia carotovora, which was isolated from potatoes showing soft rot symptoms which were collected from a field in Nuwara-Eliya, Sri Lanka. A single bacterial colony of E. carotovora obtained through sub-culturing was inoculated into 50 mL of nutrient broth (Sigma-Aldrich) and shake-incubated at 30 °C for 72 h. Then the bacterial cell concentration of the culture was determined by the dilution plate technique. At the same time, Petri dishes with nutrient agar were prepared and wells were bored in the middle of the solidified agar plates. Each well was incorporated with composites of 20, 40, or 60 mg and the wells were again filled with nutrient agar. The composites were exposed to UV light for a period of 6 h before adding them into the petri dishes. Then 100 µL of the E. carotovora culture was spread on the surface of the material in the Petri dishes and incubated at 29 ± 1 °C for 24 h. After the incubation period, the diameter of the inhibition zones corresponding to each weight level was measured using a Vernier caliper. The experiment was replicated thrice and the average values of the diameters of the inhibition zones were obtained.

Experiment 2: Potato Tuber Inoculation Test

Certified, disease-free potatoes (variety Granola) were used for inoculation. First, the tubers were thoroughly washed with water and then surface sterilized with NaOCl 1% solution. After that, the outer peels were removed. Following that, they were sliced into pieces measuring approximately 2.5 × 2 × 0.5 cm3, which were considered as replicates. Each treatment was comprised of 10 replicates of potato pieces weighing approximately 60 g each (optimum economic size of cut potato that can be used as planting material, according to Mayakaduwa et al. [15].
The following treatments were done using all three CMC spray-coated Cu−MMT nanocomposites (2.5, 5, and 7.5 g/L CMC). The potato pieces in each replicate were treated with either 20 mg, 40 mg, or 60 mg of each composite (approximately 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg/replicate). As control one group was treated with only Erwinia. In each of the above treatments, every replicate was inoculated with 10 µl of 1.2 × 105 CFU/mL Erwinia cell suspension. All inoculations were done under aseptic conditions. After three days of inoculation, observations were made and the areas of infection were measured, from which the percentages of infection were calculated using the formula, [(area infected/ total area of the tissue piece) × 100] and the values were averaged.
A factor-factorial analysis was performed to determine the effect of concentration of CMC spray coating and weight of nanocomposites on the percentage of infection in the above two experiments.

2.3.3. Soil Release Study

A soil release study was conducted as in soil medium, an interaction takes place between the tubers treated with composites and soil. Accordingly, One Cu−MMT−CMC composite (Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L) out of three was tested for its release behavior and the release of Cu was compared with pure CuSO4.5H2O and uncoated Cu-MMT. Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L was selected as it was stable in the presence of atmospheric water. The test was conducted using two potato growing soil types (i.e., sandy soil with low organic matter content and loamy soil with high organic matter content) packed in two leaching columns for seven days. The leachates were analyzed for the quantification of Cu by means of atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AAS) using a Thermo Scientific ICE 3500 spectrophotometer. The data were plotted as the cumulative percent release of Cu over time (days). A schematic representation of all experimental procedures is provided in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Properties

3.1.1. PXRD Characterization

The PXRD results provide information about the purity of materials and the crystalline phases present in the prepared nanocomposite. PXRD patterns for MMT, CMC, and Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites are shown in Figure 2. Basal dspacing values were determined using X-ray diffraction. Accordingly, Na-MMT showed a diffraction peak at 2θ = 7.40°: 1.19 nm (corresponding interlayer d001 value according to the Bragg equation). Na+ ions present in the interlayer space of MMT exchange with Cu2+ ions, causing the d001 value to shift to 1.23 nm as hydrated Cu2+ ions cause the interlayer distance to increase [41]. Many researchers have reported dspacing changes in Cu-MMT composites with values ranging from about 1.21 to 1.27 [22,28,31,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Small new reflections at 2θ = 13 in the diffraction patterns of Cu-MMT could be due to amorphous Cu(OH)2. H2O [44] while dspacing of clays vary with the level of hydration. After spray coating CMC on Cu−MMT particles, interlayer space remains unchanged as it is a surface coating on the solid Cu-MMT particles. It is important to mention that the spray coating of CMC was preferred over the direct addition of Cu−MMT into the solution as the acidity of Cu2+ ions might lead to coagulation of CMC.

3.1.2. FTIR Analysis

FTIR technique is used to study the bonding interactions involve within the nanocomposite as intermolecular bonds play an important role in the release kinetics of active ingredients present in the prepared nanocomposite. FTIR spectra for MMT, CMC, and Cu−MMT−CMC are shown in Figure 3. CMC shows a band at 2908 cm−1 due to C–H stretching of the –CH2 groups and the band due to ring stretching of –COO appears at 1600 cm−1. In addition, the bands in the region 1350–1450 cm−1 are due to symmetrical deformations of -CH2 and -COH groups. The bands due to –CH2OH stretching mode and -CH2 vibrations appear at 1070 and 1020 cm−1, respectively [49]. MMT shows a characteristic absorption band at 3400 cm−1 due to the O-H stretching of adsorbed water and the shoulder at 3628 cm−1 due to structural -OH groups of MMT. Peaks are seen at 995 cm−1 and 1125 cm−1 are due to Si-O stretching vibrations of MMT layers [47]. In the FTIR spectrum of Cu−MMT−CMC, O-H stretching of adsorbed water of MMT shows two lobes at 3350 and 3170 cm−1. In addition, the shoulder at 3628 cm−1 due to structural OH of MMT has shifted slightly to 3622 cm−1.

3.1.3. Thermal Analysis

The thermal analysis provides the thermal stability of the materials prepared. Here the weight change of the material is determined by heating the sample at a constant rate. TGA and differential thermal analysis (DTA) traces for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites are shown in Figure 4. All three Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites show similar thermal events. Up to 200 °C, a total weight loss of approximately 15% occurs due to dehydration of surface absorbed water in CMC and MMT in the nanocomposite. Furthermore, at around 250 °C, a 2% weight loss occurs due to the removal of water of the crystallization of CuSO4. The thermal event around 300 °C is due to the degradation of CMC [47] in the composites and the losses are in keeping with the concentration of CMC sprayed onto the composites. For instance, the 2.5, 5, and 7.5 g L−1 concentration levels show 2%, 3%, and 4% of weight loss, respectively. The thermal peak at 500 °C is due to further degradation of CMC residues. Those losses are approximately 3%, 5%, and 6% and correspond to the concentrations of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 g/L, respectively. The prominent thermal event at around 600–700 °C is due to the collapse of the layered structure of MMT [47]. At 800 °C another thermal event could be observed due to the removal of SO2 and O2 from CuSO4 leaving behind CuO. Finally, at 1050 °C another thermal event occurs due to the removal of O2 from CuO leaving a residue of Cu2O (Figures S1 and S2).

3.1.4. Microscopy

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM technique is used to obtain information on the surface topography of prepared nanocomposites. As seen in Figure 5a,b SEM images show that the plate-like layered structure of MMT continues to remain even after the formation of the composite which facilitates the controlled release behavior of active ingredients present in the nanocomposite. Furthermore, no accumulations of CMC could be seen, confirming the relative uniformity of the spray coats.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX)

TEM is vital for the study of the internal features of a material. Also, EDAX provides chemical information about the material. The nanoscale Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite can be seen in Figure 6a as having a mixed morphology of a large intercalated tactoid and small intercalated tactoids of MMT clay dispersed throughout the polymer under a magnification of 200 nm. This high magnification shows a large tactoid due to the flocculation of clay layers and a region of small intercalated tactoids together with a few intercalated layers. Figure 6b shows the Cu particles intercalated in MMT layers along with the CMC polymer in the form of a network in a dark field TEM image.
Besides, Figure 6c shows a nanoscale TEM−EDAX elemental mapping in which MMT layers consisting of O, Al, and Si were detected as the primary component of the MMT while CMC polymer consisting of C was detected along with the C which emanates from the sample substrate. S was observed in varying proportions throughout the nanocomposite which arises from sulphate residues present in the nanocomposite. As seen in Figure 6c TEM−EDAX image of Cu shows that Cu is distributed more evenly over the MMT layer compared to other elements.

3.2. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity Against Plant Pathogenic Erwinia carotovora

3.2.1. Experiment 1: Bacterial Growth Inhibition Test

The cell concentration of the bacterial culture was determined as 3 × 109 CFU/ mL through the dilution plate technique. Figure 7 shows the results of a bacterial inhibition test for all three Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites whereas Table 1 shows the diameters of the inhibition zones observed. The results clearly indicate that the diameter of the inhibition zone increased with the number of composites tested, indicating the antibacterial activity of all types of nanocomposites used in the study against E. carotovora.
The output of factor-factorial analysis can be interpreted in terms of a particular weight level if a slight reduction of the diameter of the inhibition zone can be observed when the concentration of the CMC spray coat increases. An interaction effect between factors was not significant when the p-value was 0.102 (p > 0.05). However, the main effects, the specifical concentration of spray coat and weight were highly significant correspondingly with p = 0.006 and p = 0.000 values (p < 0.05) to the diameter of the inhibition zone.
This indicates Cu2+ ions can be released into the medium by penetrating through the polymer network of the medium. Therefore, it can be inferred that the mobility of Cu2+ is more or less in step with the current range of concentration. Compared to the polymer-coated nanocomposites, the negative controls, i.e., CMC, MMT (Na+), or MMT−CMC did not show any antibacterial activity (data not shown) against E. carotovora.

3.2.2. Experiment 2: Potato Tuber Inoculation Test

The percent infection was decreased with the increased concentration of the CMC spray coats and increased weight of nanocomposites applied to potato tuber pieces while the control pieces showed higher infection percentages compared to other treatments (Table 2; Figure S3). Here the Cu−MMT−CMC 2.5 g/L (60 mg) showed the lowest percentage of infection. Through the factor-factorial analysis, it was revealed that the concentration of the spray coat has a significant effect on percentage infection with the p-value of 0.0016 (p < 0.05). Similarly, the weight of the nanocomposite also showed a significant effect on the percentage of infection (p < 0.001). Moreover, the interaction effect of concentration of the spray coat and weight of the nanocomposite was also significant as p-value was 0.0057 (p < 0.05).
Cu based compounds have been proven to be efficacious against many plant pathogenic bacteria including Erwinia spp. [50]. Cu compounds are widely used against many Erwinia spp. including E. amylovora in apple and pear, E. mangiferae in mango and E. trachiphila in cucurbits [51]. Among the Cu based compounds, CuSO4.5H2O is in common usage for controlling plant pathogenic bacteria [23]. In-vitro experimental results have proven its ability to control plant pathogenic bacteria species belonging to the genus Pectobacterium (formerly in the genus Erwinia) [52].
Interestingly, with respect to the potato crop, Abo-Elyousr et al. [5] have demonstrated that spraying CuSO4 had the highest controlling effect on soft rot caused by E. carotovora. In addition to that, Zhang et al. [53] reported that potato soft rot caused by E. carotovora can be effectively controlled by using CuSO4. Furthermore, Gracia-Garza et al. [54] demonstrated that treatment of greenhouse-grown calla lilies (Zantedeschia sp.) with sub-irrigation laced with Cu and Cu (OH)2 reduced the soft rot incidence of E. carotovora without compromising the plant growth.
Several other types of bacteria besides the one tested in the present study were studied. For instance, Cu−MMT composites were prepared and tested with E. coli and it was found they suppressed the growth of this organism [27,28,31,32,33]; this showed that the efficaciousness and ability of Cu-MMT were superior to Na-MMT [55]. Ag-MMT was also tested against mesophilic bacteria and bacteria present in lactic acid by Costa et al. [34] and against E. faecium by Magaña et al. [30], which showed it to be efficacious in all these cases. MMT exchanged with Cu, Ag, and Zn, when tested against E. coli, Pseudomonas ostreatus and P. cinnabarinus had shown promising results in respect of suppression of growth of those bacteria [29]; in the same study, it was reported that Cu−MMT is efficacious over Cu2+. Furthermore, certain studies had reported that Cu2+ intercalated MMT can bind with polymers to enhance the sustained release nature of Cu2+ into the medium and act against E. coli and S. aureus effectively. For example, this led to the development of a Cu−MMT-epoxy resin [35]. Furthermore, epoxy matrices with CuO nanoparticles embedded in MMT [37] and Cu2O embedded in octadecyl amine-modified MMT [21] have also been studied and found to be very effective at suppressing the growth of E. coli. Therefore, the present study provides new insights into employing Cu−MMT-polymer composites for controlling plant diseases.
In general, positively charged biomaterial—i.e., polymer surfaces show an antimicrobial effect on adhering Gram-negative bacteria [56]. Replacement of Na+ in Na−MMT by Cu2+ increases the presence of positive charges on the surface and in the interlayer space of MMT where the Gram-negative bacteria tend to get attached. E. carotovora is a Gram-negative bacterium that is highly vulnerable to Cu2+ [29,31]. The addition of a biopolymer like CMC on Cu−MMT particles further enhances the release of Cu2+ ions by absorbing moisture from the environment. Moisture absorption by CMC due to its highly hydrophilic carboxylic group causes the CMC composite to swell to a marked extent, depending mainly upon the pH of the medium [57,58]. The MMT also increases the swelling capacity of certain composites, i.e., CMC-g-poly (acrylamide)-MMT [59].
In Sri Lanka, losses caused by E. carotovora are significant in certain economically important crops [60,61]. As observed, farmers in Sri Lanka tend to cut the seed potato instead of the whole tuber to minimize the costs incurred. Under such situations, infestations could be higher as the cut surfaces facilitate the penetration process. Furthermore, Cu2+ is not only efficacious against bacteria, but it also affects soil-borne fungi such as Phytopthora spp. Its broad range of action against organisms that destroy crops has favored higher usage of Cu2+ throughout the world.

3.3. Soil Release Study

The cumulative amounts of Cu released plotted against time from CuSO4.5H2O, Cu−MMT, and Cu−MMT−CMC were measured using a sandy soil sample. The results are shown in Figure 8. Overall, the Cu releasing pattern from pure Cu (from CuSO4) and Cu−MMT nanocomposite are similar when compared to Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite, which nearly leveled off after the third day.
As shown in the results, at the end of the first 12 h, Cu−MMT−CMC cumulative release percentage was around 2.2. The release percentage gets gradually increased to five times of initial quantity until day 5 and then gets leveled off just over 10.5%. Initially, there is a 1% of Cu release from Cu-MMT and then slightly increased release behavior up to 4.5% of Cu at 120 h which is similar to the Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite. Nearly two times lower release of Cu from Cu-MMT than Cu−MMT−CMC may be due to the non-covalent intercalation of Cu inside the MMT layers that induces the slow release even though they had similar kinetics. The burst release of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite (coated) compared to Cu−MMT can be due to CMC coating. CMC absorbs and retains water which swells to facilitate dissolution of more trapped Cu within MMT and after that release through diffusion to the surrounding.
Based on the results obtained for pure Cu, the instantaneous Cu release was observed on the first 12 h which is around 7%. Despite this, the rest release pattern of pure Cu showed moderately increasing behavior reaching nearly 9% around day 7. However, the comparative analysis indicated that the nanocomposite had a slow-release behavior followed by instantaneous release due to the absence of modifications compared to the other two formulations. Thus, it reveals that the addition of CMC to the Cu−MMT (Cu−MMT−CMC) nanocomposite might concentrate much of the copper inside nanocomposite giving the ability to release Cu in a gradually increasing manner and the same time Cu ions which have been loaded to the intercalated MMT(Cu−MMT) layers enabling them to be released in a slow and controlled manner. In general, the release pattern of Cu from Cu−MMT−CMC gives a better and controlled release behavior in comparison to the other two forms.
In contrast, the leachate of potato soil with higher organic matter content did not contain Cu. Thus, releasing around 10% of Cu from the composite incorporated into the sandy soil is considerable. The reasons behind on not containing Cu in the leachate might be the complexation and coagulation of Cu with humic acids [62], which might be an underlying cause that prevents releasing Cu in this case.

4. Conclusions

Through the current work, Cu intercalated montmorillonite nanocomposites coated with three different concentration of CMC spray were formulated and characterized for their essential properties. FTIR spectra and TGA traces confirmed the association of Cu−MMT with CMC. The plate-like appearance of MMT was maintained even after nanocomposite formation which is vital for controlled release behavior. All three Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites showed antibacterial activity against E. carotovora making them suitable for tuber treatments. Furthermore, in the agar plate experiment, antimicrobial activity was slightly reduced when the concentration of the CMC spray coats increased; this implied that the Cu2+ ions released into the medium by penetrating through the polymer network were slightly affected by the CMC coating on the Cu−MMT particles. When the composite was tested for the release of Cu2+, it was found that it could release Cu2+ instantaneously, followed by a controlled release pattern. Furthermore, it carries a great commercial potential as clays and biodegradable CMC are environmentally friendly, biocompatible, and economically viable.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2079-4991/11/3/802/s1, Figure S1: TGA curve of MMT; Figure S2: TGA curves of CMC; and Figure S3: TGA curves of CMC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R., D.D.C., and N.M.A.; Methodology, R.R., D.D.C., L.S., and N.M.A.; Software, R.R.; Validation, R.R., D.D.C., L.S., and N.M.A.; Formal analysis, R.R. and N.M.A.; Investigation, R.R.; Resources, D.D.C. and N.M.A.; Data curation, R.R.; Writing—original draft preparation, R.R., D.D.C., L.S., and N.M.A.; Writing—review and editing, A.H., M.B., M.S., and P.V.; Visualization, R.R.; Supervision, D.D.C. and N.M.A.; Project administration, N.M.A. and M.S.; Funding acquisition, A.H., M.B., M.S., and P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by an S-grant from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Most of the recorded data are available in Tables and Figures of the manuscripts.

Acknowledgments

Authors thankful to the Department of Agricultural Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya (UoP) for providing laboratory facilities. Authors also grateful to the Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, the UK for the support given for material characterization. Furthermore, all authors are thankful to the Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture (UoP) and the Agribusiness Centre of the Faculty of Agriculture (UoP), Sri Lanka, for their inputs in statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Epstein, L.; Bassein, S. Pesticide Applications of Copper on Perennial Crops in California, 1993 to 1998. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 1844–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Stoffella, P.J. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dias, M.C. Phytotoxicity: An Overview of the Physiological Responses of Plants Exposed to Fungicides. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Behlau, F.; Scandelai, L.H.M.; Junior, G.J.D.S.; Lanza, F.E. Soluble and insoluble copper formulations and metallic copper rate for control of citrus canker on sweet orange trees. Crop. Prot. 2017, 94, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abo-Elyousr, K.A.; Allam, A.D.A.; Sallam, M.A.; Hassan, M.H.A. Role of certain potato tubers constituents in their resistance to bacterial soft rot caused by Erwinia carotovora pv. carotovora. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2010, 43, 1190–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Snehalatharani, A.; Khan, A.N.A. Biochemical and physiological characterisation of Erwinia species causing tip-over disease of banana. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2010, 43, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Żołobowska, L.; Pospieszny, H. Diversity of soft rot Erwinias occurring on economically important crops in Poland. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 1999, 32, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van Hall, C.J.J. Bijdragen Tot de Kennis der Bakterieele Plantenzeikten, Cooperatieve Drukerij-Vereeniging “Plantijn”. Inaugural Dissertation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1902. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dye, D.W. A taxonomic study of the genus Erwinia. n. The “carotovora” group. N. Z. J. Sci. 1969, 12, 81–97. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dye, D.W. A taxonomic study o.f the genus Erwinia. III. The “herbicola” group. N. Z. J. Sci. 1969, 12, 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dye, D.W. A taxonomic study o.fthe genus Erwinia. IV. “Atypical” Erwinias. N. Z. J. Sci. 1969, 12, 833–839. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones, L.R. Bacillus carotovorus n. sp. die Ursache einer weichen Faulnis der M6hre. Cent. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infekt. Krankh. 1901, 2, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bergey, D.H.; Harrison, F.C.; Breed, R.S.; Hammer, B.W.; Huntoon, F.M. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 1st ed.; Williams & Wilkins Co: Baltimore, MA, USA, 1923. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hyman, L.; Dewasmes, V.; Toth, I.; Perombelon, M. Improved PCR detection sensitivity of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica in potato tuber peel extract by prior enrichment on a selective medium. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 25, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mayakaduwa, M.A.P.; Babu, A.G.C.; Nugaliyadde, M.M.; Peter, J.; Kahawandala, K.R.S.C.B.; Nishshanka, N.I.J.H. Performance of seed tuber pieces of potato as planting material under up country wet zone conditions. Ann. Sri Lanka Dep. Agric. 2017, 19, 129–138. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fan, J.; He, Z.; Ma, L.Q.; Stoffella, P.J. Accumulation and availability of copper in citrus grove soils as affected by fungicide application. J. Soils Sediments 2011, 11, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Rajab, A.J.; Hakami, O.M. Behavior of the non-selective herbicide glyphosate in agricultural soil. Am. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 10, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Msaky, J.J.; Tanaka, U.; Mizuta, J.; Kosaki, T. Copper levels in soils treated with fungicides under traditional agroforestry (kihamba) system in Moshi District, Tanzania. Jpn. J. Trop. Agric. 2002, 46, 230–238. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mirlean, N.; Roisenberg, A.; Chies, J.O. Metal contamination of vineyard soils in wet subtropics (southern Brazil). Environ. Pollut. 2007, 149, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wightwick, A.M.; Mollah, M.R.; Partington, D.L.; Allinson, G. Copper Fungicide Residues in Australian Vineyard Soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 2457–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. de Oliveira-Filho, E.C.; Lopes, R.M.; Paumgartten, F.J.R. Comparative study on the susceptibility of freshwater species to copper-based pesticides. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xia, M.S.; Hu, C.H.; Xu, Z.R.; Ye, Y.; Zhou, Y.H.; Xiong, L. Effects of Copper-bearing Montmorillonite (Cu-MMT) on Escherichia coli and Diarrhea on Weanling Pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 17, 1712–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Van Zwieten, L.; Rust, J.; Kingston, T.; Merrington, G.; Morris, S. Influence of copper fungicide residues on occurrence of earthworms in avocado orchard soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 329, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eijsackers, H.; Beneke, P.; Maboeta, M.; Louw, J.; Reinecke, A. The implications of copper fungicide usage in vineyards for earthworm activity and resulting sustainable soil quality. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 62, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Georgopoulos, P.G.; Roy, A.; Lioy, M.J.; Opiekun, R.E.; Lioy, P.J. Environmental copper: Its dynamics and human exposure issues. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 2001, 4, 341–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lepp, N.W. (Ed.) Effect of Heavy Metal Pollution on Plants: Effects of Trace Metals on Plant Function; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012; 352 p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wanyika, H. Controlled Release of Agrochemicals Intercalated into Montmorillonite Interlayer Space. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bruna, J.E.; Penaloza, A.; Guarda, F.; Rodriguez, F.; Galotto, M.J. Development of MtCu2+/LDPE nanocomposites with anti-microbial activity for potential use in food packaging. Appl. Clay Sci. 2012, 58, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Malachova, K.; Praus, P.; Rybkova, Z.; Kozak, O. Antibacterial & antifungal activities of silver, copper and zinc montmorillo-nites. Appl. Clay Sci. 2011, 53, 642–645. [Google Scholar]
  30. Magaña, S.; Quintana, P.; Aguilar, D.; Toledo, J.; Ángeles-Chávez, C.; Cortés, M.; León, L.; Freile-Pelegrín, Y.; López, T.; Sánchez, R.T. Antibacterial activity of montmorillonites modified with silver. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2008, 281, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, C.-H.; Xia, M.-S. Adsorption and antibacterial effect of copper-exchanged montmorillonite on Escherichia coli K88. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tong, G.; Yulong, M.; Peng, G.; Zirong, X. Antibacterial effects of the Cu(II)-exchanged montmorillonite on Escherichia coli K88 and Salmonella choleraesuis. Veter Microbiol. 2005, 105, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Y.; Xia, M.; Ye, Y.; Hu, C. Antimicrobial ability of Cu-montmorillonite. Appl. Clay Sci. 2004, 27, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Costa, C.; Conte, A.; Buonocore, G.; del Nobile, M. Antimicrobial silver-montmorillonite nanoparticles to prolong the shelf life of fresh fruit salad. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 148, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bartolozzi, A.; Bertani, R.; Burigo, E.; Fabrizi, A.; Panozzo, F.; Quaresimin, M.; Simionato, F.; Sgarbossa, P.; Tamburini, S.; Zappalorto, M.; et al. Multifunctional Cu2+-montmorillonite/epoxy resin nanocomposites with antibacterial activity. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 44733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nouri, A.; Yaraki, M.T.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K. Enhanced Antibacterial effect of chitosan film using Montmorillonite/CuO nanocomposite. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sohrabnezhad, S.; Moghaddam, M.M.; Salavatiyan, T. Synthesis and characterization of CuO–montmorillonite nanocomposite by thermal decomposition method and antibacterial activity of nanocomposite. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 125, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De, B.; Gupta, K.; Mandal, M.; Karak, N. Biocide immobilized OMMT-carbon dot reduced Cu2O nanohybrid/hyperbranched epoxy nanocomposites: Mechanical, thermal, antimicrobial and optical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 56, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Roy, A.; Singh, S.K.; Bajpai, J.; Bajpai, A.K. Controlled pesticide release from biodegradable polymers. Open Chem. 2014, 12, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lam, C.-K.; Lau, K.-T.; Cheung, H.-Y.; Ling, H.-Y. Effect of ultrasound sonication in nanoclay clusters of nanoclay/epoxy composites. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 1369–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bahranowski, K.; Dula, R.; Labanowska, M.; Serwicka, E.M. ESR study of Cu centers supported on AI-, Ti-, and Zr-pillared montmorillonite clays. Appl. Spectrosc. 1996, 50, 1439–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bruna, J.; Galotto, M.; Guarda, A.; Rodriguez, F. A novel polymer based on MtCu2+/cellulose acetate with antimicrobial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bruna, J.E.; Quilodrán, H.; Guarda, A.; Rodríguez, F.; Galotto, M.J.; Figueroa, P. Development of antibacterial MtCu/PLA nanocomposites by casting method for potential use in food packaging. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2015, 60, 3009–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Martucci, J.F.; Ruseckaite, R.A. Antibacterial activity of gelatin/copper (II)-exchanged montmorillonite films. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 64, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Wu, Y.; Zhou, N.; Li, W.; Gu, H.; Fan, Y.; Yuan, J. Long-term and controlled release of chlorhexidine-copper (II) from organ-ically modified montmorillonite (OMMT) nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2013, 1, 752–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kozák, O.; Praus, P.; Machovič, V.; Klika, Z. Adsorption of zinc and copper ions on natural and ethylenediamine modified montmorillonite. Ceram. Silikáty 2010, 54, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  47. Madusanka, N.; de Silva, K.N.; Amaratunga, G. A curcumin activated carboxymethyl cellulose–montmorillonite clay nanocomposite having enhanced curcumin release in aqueous media. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 134, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Purwar, R.; Verma, A.; Batra, R. Antimicrobial gelatin/sericin/clay films for packaging of hygiene products. J. Polym. Eng. 2019, 39, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ismail, N.M.; Bono, A.; Valentinus, A.C.S.; Nilus, S.; Chang, L.M. Optimization of reaction conditions for preparing carbox-ymethylcellulose. J. Appl. Sci. 2010, 10, 2530–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Blom, T.J.; Brown, W. Preplant Copper-based Compounds Reduce Erwinia Soft Rot on Calla Lilies. HortTechnology 1999, 9, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rusjan, D. Copper in Horticulture, Fungicides for Plant and Animal Diseases; Dhanasekaran, D., Thajuddin, N., Panneerselvam, A., Eds.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Czajkowski, R.; Pérombelon, M.C.M.; van Veen, J.A.; van der Wolf, J.M. Control of blackleg and tuber soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species: A review. Plant Pathol. 2011, 60, 999–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.J.; Wang, J.S.; Fang, Z.D. Control of potato soft rot (Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora (Jones) Dye) by copper sulphate and its effect on some enzymes in tubers. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 1993, 23, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  54. Gracia-Garza, J.A.; Allen, W.; Blom, T.J.; Brown, W. Pre-and post-plant applications of copper-based compounds to control Erwinia soft rot of calla lilies. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 24, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Guo, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, S.; Niu, H.; Chen, Z.; Xu, J. Enhanced sorption of radiocobalt from water by Bi (III) modified mont-morillonite: A novel adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 168–175. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gottenbos, B.; Grijpma, D.W.; van der Mei, H.C.; Feijen, J.; Busscher, H.J. Antimicrobial effects of positively charged surfaces on adhering Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2001, 48, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chang, C.; Duan, B.; Cai, J.; Zhang, L. Superabsorbent hydrogels based on cellulose for smart swelling and controllable delivery. Eur. Polym. J. 2010, 46, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sarkar, D.J.; Singh, A. pH-triggered release of boron and thiamethoxam from boric acid crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel based formulations. Polym. Plast. Technol. Mater. 2019, 58, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kenawy, E.-R.; Azaam, M.M.; El-Nshar, E.M. Preparation of carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly (acrylamide)/montmorillonite superabsorbent composite as a slow-release urea fertilizer. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 2072–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kayalvily, T.D.; Jegathambigai, V.; Karunarathne, M.D.S.D.; Svinningen, A.; Mikunthan, G. Prevalence of Erwinia soft rot affecting cut foliage, Dracaena sanderiana ornamental industry and solution towards its management. Commun. Agric. Appl. Boil. Sci. 2012, 77, 265–273. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wasana, W.P.; Kuruppuarachchi, K.A.P.P.; Yapa, P.N.; Hettiarachi, S. Antimicrobial activity of selected spices against Pectobacterium carotovorum isolated from some vegetables in Sri Lanka. J. Sci. Univ. Kelaniya Sri Lanka 2019, 12, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Boguta, P.; d’ Orazio, V.; Sokołowska, Z.; Senesi, N. Effects of selected chemical and physicochemical properties of humic acids from peat soils on their interaction mechanisms with copper ions at various pHs. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 168, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental procedures.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the experimental procedures.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g001
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of Na−MMT, CMC, Cu−MMT, and Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 2. PXRD patterns of Na−MMT, CMC, Cu−MMT, and Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g003
Figure 4. TGA (which denotes weight loss) and DTA (which denotes derivative weight) profiles for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 4. TGA (which denotes weight loss) and DTA (which denotes derivative weight) profiles for Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites (a,b).
Figure 5. SEM images of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites (a,b).
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g005
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite, (b) area considered for EDAX analysis, and (c) EDAX elemental mapping images showing the existence of MMT layers composed of C, O, Al, Si, Cu, and S within the Cu−CMC−MMT nanocomposite.
Figure 6. (a) TEM image of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposite, (b) area considered for EDAX analysis, and (c) EDAX elemental mapping images showing the existence of MMT layers composed of C, O, Al, Si, Cu, and S within the Cu−CMC−MMT nanocomposite.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g006
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity of Cu−MMT−CMC nanocomposites.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g007
Figure 8. Cumulative release of Cu2+ from Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, Cu−MMT, and CuSO4.5H2O.
Figure 8. Cumulative release of Cu2+ from Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, Cu−MMT, and CuSO4.5H2O.
Nanomaterials 11 00802 g008
Table 1. Diameters of the inhibition zones corresponding to various amounts of composites
Table 1. Diameters of the inhibition zones corresponding to various amounts of composites
Weight Per Well20 mg40 mg60 mg
Composite *Diameters of the inhibition zones (cm)
C11.75 (±0.0115)2.40 (±0.0)2.50 (±0.153)
C21.75 (±0.116)2.36 (±0.116)2.42 (±0.300)
C31.71 (±0.010)2.15 (±0.0115)2.20 (±0.015)
Prior to the antibacterial test, the average Cu content of the composites in triplicate was determined through AAS and found to be 9.2%, 8.6% and 8.2% of Cu by weight respectively, which corresponded to spray coats of 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 g/L (C1 = Cu−MMT−CMC 2.5 g/L, C2 = Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, C3 = Cu−MMT−CMC, 7.5 g/L). Values given in parentheses in the table include standard errors of means.
Table 2. Variation of mean percentages of infection by E. carotovora on potato tuber pieces under different treatments
Table 2. Variation of mean percentages of infection by E. carotovora on potato tuber pieces under different treatments
TreatmentsComposite Weight Levels
20 mg40 mg60 mg
CompositeMean percentage infection
C10.73 (±0.168)1.68 (±0.191)0.18 (±0.267)
C22.24 (±0.223)2.12 (±0.852)0.46 (±0.329)
C32.46 (±0.223)2.26 (±0.174)0.56 (±0.527)
Control2.51 (±0.142)2.51 (±0.142)2.51 (±0.142)
C1 = Cu−MMT−CMC 2.5 g/L, C2 = Cu−MMT−CMC 5.0 g/L, C3 = Cu-MMT-CMC, 7.5 g/L; Control: Untreated potato + E. carotovora; Values given in parentheses in the table include standard errors of means.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rienzie, R.; Sendanayake, L.; De Costa, D.; Hossain, A.; Brestic, M.; Skalicky, M.; Vachova, P.; Adassooriya, N.M. Assessing the Carboxymethylcellulose Copper-Montmorillonite Nanocomposite for Controlling the Infection of Erwinia carotovora in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 802. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030802

AMA Style

Rienzie R, Sendanayake L, De Costa D, Hossain A, Brestic M, Skalicky M, Vachova P, Adassooriya NM. Assessing the Carboxymethylcellulose Copper-Montmorillonite Nanocomposite for Controlling the Infection of Erwinia carotovora in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(3):802. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rienzie, Ryan, Lasantha Sendanayake, Devika De Costa, Akbar Hossain, Marian Brestic, Milan Skalicky, Pavla Vachova, and Nadeesh M. Adassooriya. 2021. "Assessing the Carboxymethylcellulose Copper-Montmorillonite Nanocomposite for Controlling the Infection of Erwinia carotovora in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)" Nanomaterials 11, no. 3: 802. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano11030802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop