Next Article in Journal
Functional Characterization of F3H Gene and Optimization of Dihydrokaempferol Biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Previous Article in Journal
Mercury Adsorption and Oxidation Performance of an Iron-Based Oxygen Carrier during Coal Chemical Looping Process
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plant In Vitro Cultures of Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. “Electric Lime” and Possibilities of Modification in the Biosynthesis of Volatile Compounds

1
Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Square 24a, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Food Chemistry and Biocatalysis, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25, 53-375 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(10), 2193; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102193
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Revised: 4 May 2024 / Accepted: 6 May 2024 / Published: 8 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Plants Volatile Compounds)

Abstract

:
Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. is a globally spread species, known for its characteristic spectacularly colorful leaves of decorative value. Thanks to its rich chemical composition, the plant is used in ethnopharmacology, and it is also regarded as having high medicinal potential. The application of in vitro cultures enables the acquisition of homogeneous certified material of high quality. Additionally, excluding the effect of biotic and abiotic factors on the plants is a way to fully recognize the influence of phytohormones on the plant morphology and the biosynthetic pathways of compound production. The best way to grow C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” under in vitro conditions is to use the basic MS medium (Murashige and Skoog medium), enriched with naphthyl-1-acetic acid at a concentration of 0.5 mg dm−3. The analysis of volatile compounds demonstrated that the content of volatile compounds in the plants cultivated under in vivo conditions was expressed at a level of 2848.59 µg g−1, whereas in the plants bred in vitro without supplementation with phytohormones, the level was 8191.47 µg g−1. The highest content was noted for copaene, α-pinene, 1-octene-3-ol, α-selinene, sabinen, γ- and δ-cadinene, 3-octanol, and β-pinene. Aroma profiling revealed a lack of boranyl acetate, 2-hexenal, and 2-hexen-1-ol in the plants cultivated under in vivo conditions. Differences were found in the volatile composition between plants bred in vivo and in vitro, with the most significant recorded for the contents of 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanol. The addition of plant growth regulators into the basic medium under in vitro conditions affected the percentage ratio and contents of specific compounds in plant tissues. The most intense biosynthesis of volatile compounds took place in the plants cultivated on the medium enriched with NAA at 10,579.11 µg g−1, whereas the least intense was noted for plants cultivated on the medium supplemented with BA, where it was recorded at the level of 5610.02 µg g−1. So far, there has been no research published which would pertain to the profiling of volatile compounds performed using the SPME (solid-phase microextraction) technique. Moreover, the very few studies conducted on the chemical composition of these compounds do not mention the specific variety of C. scutellarioides under analysis.

1. Introduction

The coleus Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. belongs to the genus Coleus within the mint family Lamiaceae Lindl. Based on research carried out in 2018–2019, the genus Coleus was created, which includes a few species formerly ranked with the genus Plectranthus L’Hér., the species C. scutellarioides being identified, among others [1,2].
The generic name coleus comes from the Greek word koleos, meaning a shield, and refers to the way the stamens are merged with one another. The epithet scutellarioides means “resembling the genus Scutellaria”, the name which has been derived from the Latin word scutella, denoting a dish or little bowl, with reference to the shape of the calyx, which remains stable after the flowers have withered. Moreover, the term “coleus” is commonly used by gardeners with reference to this particular species [3,4,5].
Investigations show that the tissues of coleus contain rosmarinic acid, which is one of the main components in the plant [6]. The species composition also includes sterols, triterpenoids, campesterol, alfa-amyrine, beta-amyrine, flavonoids, and substances similar to salvinorin of unknown chemical structures, as well as diterpenoids of the abietan type, spirocutelones A-C, coleanol, forskoline, secoabietan, barbutazine, napthopiron, plectryne, crocetine, plectrinon A, deoxycoleonol, acetoxycoleosol, coleol, coleonon, coleon O and G, lanugon K, and 6-acetylfredericon B. Its leaves contain alkaloids, saponines, tannins, quercetin, phenolic compounds, and anthocyanins [7,8,9,10,11]. In raw leaf extract, the occurrence of terpenoids, phenolic compounds, polyphenols, flavonoids, quinones, saponins, and anthraquinones was recorded [12,13]. The content of essential oil in the leaves amounted to 0.04%. The oil is brownish yellow, with a biscuit flavor and a tea fragrance. The main components of the oil are: phytol (21.1%), germacrene-D (9.30%), caryophyllene (8.84%), ß-elemen (6.84%), and neophytadiene (6.08%) [14]. Mass spectrum (GC-MS) examination revealed the largest share of spathulenol (24.57%), germacrene-D (14.53%), bicyclogermacrene (11.24%), nonacosan (9.74%) and morillol (4.85%) [15].
As a medicinal plant, C. scutellarioides has been used in folk phytotherapy and has attracted scientific interest due to its properties. The currently pursued research on the species reveals its potential activity as an inhibitor of the histamine H4 receptor [10]. Furthermore, it improves wound healing, inhibits inflammatory and exudative processes, and reduces pain [13]. It also acts against certain cancer cell lines, and exhibits antioxidant, fungistatic, antidiabetic, antipyretic, and immunostimulant properties, as well as antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans [8,9,16,17,18,19,20].
In the Philippine folk medicine, C. scutellarioides leaves are used for the treatment of headaches, maldigestion, sinusitis, bruise healing, and to stop the bleeding from wounds. Advantageous effects have also been recorded for the extract, which is administered in the form of drops, to relieve conjunctivitis. As a traditional Asian plant, the herb is applied in the treatment of angina pectoris, asthma, bronchitis, gastric problems, epilepsy, elephantiasis, insomnia, skin rashes, and scorpion bites. In Southeast Asia, the plant is dedicated to the treatment of dysentery and various gastric problems. In Indonesia, certain varieties are used to treat abscesses, ulcers, and inflammation of the eyes and ears. Roots find application in the treatment of diarrhea and stomach aches, as well as in the therapy of diabetes, constipations, fever, and painful menstruation. On the Vanuatu islands, its extracts are used for abortion, as a contraceptive, or as a remedy for amenorrhea. The leaves are utilized as an emmenagogic agent, but also for improving lactation through the heating and softening of the plant in hot water and applying the preparation onto the nipples [19,21,22,23,24,25].
Thus far, no research has been published focusing on the profiling of volatile compounds using the SPME (solid-phase microextraction) technique. Moreover, in the very few studies on the chemical composition of coleus, there is no mention of the specific varieties of C. scutellarioides analyzed in this paper.
The application of plant tissue culture is a very good and fast means to acquire homogeneous plant material in large quantities. Through micropropagation, it is possible to produce numerous clones of a given plant. Material obtained in in vitro culture is characterized by homogeneity, high quality, and repeatability. Employment of this technique in the propagation of medicinal plants allows for a standardized raw material to be achieved. It ensures that plants of documented quality can quickly be introduced into cultivation [26].
The purpose of our study was to produce an in vitro culture of C. scutellarioides in order to obtain uniform testing material. The use of growth regulators allowed us to study their effects on the plant under study. Morphological changes in the plant were determined, as well as differences in volatile compounds.

2. Results

2.1. Plant In Vitro Cultures

The effective induction of cultures was conducted using exclusively stems with nodes (plants without roots/shoots or leaves). The stems themselves showed vitality and produced roots. However, shoot production was not observed.
The plants cultivated under in vitro conditions responded differently to the composition of the breeding medium (Figure 1a–f). The stems of plants bred on media supplemented with 0.5 mg dm−3 of BA and 0.5 mg dm−3 of 2iP turned black at the place of immediate contact with the substratum (Figure 1b,c). Additionally, the root growth cones in the plants cultivated on the medium enriched with 0.5 mg dm−3 of fluridone were observed to turn brown, or they assumed the white color (Figure 1d).
The best rooting (96.7% on average) was recorded for the medium supplemented with auxins. Under control conditions, the rooting process was lower by over 8.8% than that observed for the medium enriched with auxin IAA. Cytokinins added to the breeding medium reduced the rooting of explants by 67.7%, whereas the addition of fluridone caused a decline in explants rooting by 19.5%, as compared with the control. The shoot production was found to be the same under each circumstances—all the plants produced shoots. The highest survivability, at a level of 95.8%, was characteristic of those explants which were cultivated on the medium supplemented with auxins. Cytokinins caused the lowering of survivability by over 11.6% in comparison with the control conditions, while fluridone had the worst effect on survivability, reducing it by over 19.5% compared with that of the control.
The variance analysis performed has shown that the type of phytohormones used affects all of the analyzed traits, except for the number of shoots. The largest mean root length—7.04 cm—was attained on the medium with an addition of IAA and on that enriched with NAA. Supplementation with fluridone resulted in a decrease in the root length by 2 cm compared to plants cultivated on the control medium. The roots were over three times shorter on the breeding medium with BA, and over five times shorter on the medium supplemented with 2iP in comparison with the plants cultivated under control conditions, i.e., without plant growth regulators. The best growth of shoots was observed in the plants bred on the medium enriched with auxins (IAA or NAA) and those bred on the control medium, with shoots over 2 cm long. Fluridone added to the breeding medium caused a decrease in the shoot length by 1.4 times as compared with that of the plants cultivated on the medium lacking phytohormones, whereas the addition of cytokinins (BA or 2iP) resulted in a double reduction of the shoot length as compared with that of the control sample (Figure 2a). The highest mean number of roots was attained in the case of explants bred on the medium enriched with IAA, with a ca 1.5 times more than that noted on the control medium. More than nine times fewer roots were produced on the media supplemented with cytokinins in comparison with the rate under control conditions. The average number of roots on the medium enriched with fluridone equaled 6.22. For the number of shoots—the level of which was 2.75–4.57 cm (Figure 2b)—no statistically significant differences were noted.

2.2. Volatile Compounds Composition

Analysis of volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides. “Electric Lime” revealed the occurrence of 30 compounds when the plant was cultivated under in vivo conditions, whereas 33 volatile compounds were identified in the plants derived from in vitro cultures (Table 1 and Table 2). The main volatile compounds recognized were: copaene, α-pinene, 1-octen-3-ol, α-selinene, sabinen, γ- and δ-cadinene, 3-octanol, and β-pinene.
One-factor variance analysis demonstrated that the content of volatile compounds in the plants cultivated under in vivo conditions was at a level of 2848.59 µg g−1, whereas in the plants bred in vitro without supplementation with phytohormones, the content was at a level of 8191.47 µg g−1. Moreover, aroma profiling revealed a lack of 2-hexenal and 2-hexen-1-ol, and only trace amounts of boranyl acetate in the plants grown in vivo. The quantities of particular volatile compounds calculated in relation to the internal standards differed between plants grown under in vivo conditions and those bred in in vitro culture. In the plants cultivated in vivo, there was 1.6 times more sabinen and 11.3 times more 3-hexen-1-ol acetate, while under in vitro control conditions, there was 9.1 times more 1-octen-3-ol, 8.8 times more 3-octanol, 4.7 times more 3-octanone, 3.8 times more linalool, and 4.3 times more α-muurolene (Figure 3a–c). The average amount of the compounds reached the level of 10,579.11 µg g−1.
The most intense biosynthesis of volatile compounds took place in the plants cultivated on the medium enriched with NAA, whereas the least intense was observed on the medium supplemented with BA, where it was recorded at the level of 5610.02 µg g−1. Irrespective of the plant growth regulator added to the breeding medium, supplementation was found to reduce the biosynthesis of 2-hexen-1-ol, α-phellandrene, p-cymene, and nonanal. On the other hand, the biosynthesis of camphene, β-pinene, boranyl acetate, β-myrcene, and eucalyptol was observed to increase, irrespective of the phytohormone applied to the breeding medium. BA caused the highest intensification in the biosynthesis of 3-hexen1-ol acetate, by 4.5 times. Of the employed plant growth regulators, it was only BA which caused a decline in the biosynthesis of linalool, β-elemene, δ-guaiene, α-selinene, and γ-selinene.
Among the phytohormones used, fluridone most significantly enhanced the biosynthesis of α-muurolene (1.2 times), α-pinene (1.3 times), limonene (1.4 times), β-pinene (1.5 times), santalene (2.1 times), linalool and cyclosativene (1.6 times), δ-guaiene (1.9 times), sabinen (3.0 times), and β-chamigrene (7.9 times). On the other hand, fluridone was responsible for the largest drop in the biosynthesis of 1-hexanol and di-epi-α-cedrene. As the only one of the applied plant growth regulators, NAA supplemented in the breeding medium improved the biosynthesis of 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol, 3-hexen-1-ol, 2-hexanal, and 1-hexanol. This phytohormone was found to most significantly stimulate the biosynthesis of 2-hexenal (1.1 times), 3-hexen-1-ol and γ- and δ-cadinene (1.2 times), 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol and 1-hexanol (1.3 times), copaene (1.5 times), α-selinene (1.7 times), β-elemene (2.0 times), and eucalyptol (8.6 times). IAA was the only plant growth regulator supplemented in the breeding medium that was recorded to have a negative impact on the biosynthesis of α-pinene. However, this phytohormone was found to be the best stimulating agent for the biosynthesis of 3-octanone (1.4 times), germacrene-D (1.8 times), caryophyllene (2.3 times), di-epi-α-cedrene (3.3 times), camphene (9.9 times), and boranyl acetate (62 times).
The addition of BA to the medium induces a clear decreasing trend in the context of the content of individual volatile compounds; however, in the case of α-pinene, camphene, sabinene, β-pinene, bornyl acetate, β-myrcene, 3-hexen-1-ol, acetate, limonene, and eucalyptol, it stimulates biosynthesis. Fluridone and IAA stimulated biosynthesis for 17 compounds, while it decreased biosynthesis for 16 compounds. No stimulatory or inhibitory trend is observed. In the case of NAA, a clear stimulating trend is observed for the biosynthesis of volatile compounds, with the exception of 2-hexen-1-ol, α-phellandrene, p-cymene, and nonanal, for which showed a decreasing trend (Figure 4a–c). The calculated correlation coefficients generally confirmed, for most of the analyzed compounds, an increase in their biosynthesis with phytohormone supplementation (Supplementary Table S1).

3. Discussion

3.1. Discussion of In Vitro Cultivation

The effective induction of aseptic tissue cultures was attained by using stems with nodal segments. Other scientific teams induced tissue culture in C. scutellarioides from stems, leaves, or nodal segments comprising lateral buds and from apical shoots [27,28,29,30].
In our study, induction was successful after six weeks. Auxins are reported to positively affect the diversification of cells, elongational growth, and plant rooting. The auxins used in our research, which are NAA (naphthyl-1-acetate acid) and IAA (indolil-3-acetate acid), exerted such a stimulating influence on the studied plants. Although the differences were not statistically significant, in the case of C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”, the greatest number of shoots were observed when NAA had been added, but not in the case of supplementation with cytokinins, which are known to abolish the apical dominance, thus causing plant branching. It is probable that there was a high amount of cytokinins in the initial material, and therefore, no significant effect after their supplementation was recorded.
In the case of plant in vitro culture, the application of appropriate physical factors, as well as hormones or their mixtures at a proper proportion, can induce a desirable morphological response of the plant. Investigations demonstrate that a combination of 0.5 mg dm−3 GA3 (gibberellic acid-3) and 0.5 mg dm−3 BAP (6-benzylaminopurine) caused a 1.4- and 1.3-fold increase, respectively, in the number of shoots and the plant height in comparison with those of the control. The application of 1.0 mg dm−3 IBA (indolylbutyric acid) prompted the earliest appearance of the roots, accompanied by a nearly 2.3-fold increase in the number of roots per stem as compared with the control medium [30]. Research also shows that breeding C. scutellarioides shoots on an MS medium beneath LED diodes combining red and green light is a good option for the stimulation of shoot proliferation in this plant [27].
The culture of callus and capillary roots can be applicable in a diversified multi-cascade production of secondary metabolites for industry. Biologically active compounds can be acquired without the usage of a whole plant. Production in a bioreactor is not limited by the biotic and abiotic factors involved with conventional cultivation. Callus was successfully induced on explants originating from stems through the application of a B5 (Gamborg medium) basic medium supplemented with 0.8 mg dm−3 2,4-D(2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), 0.5 mg dm−3 NAA, or 2.0 mg dm−3 BA [28]. The team achieved callus production on a B5 medium enriched with 0.8 mg dm−3 2,4-D after 15 days in darkness. Subsequently, in order to obtain a suspension culture, a callus of high looseness was separated, and transferred into a liquid medium, with an addition of 2.0 mg dm−3 BA, 0.5 mg dm−3 NAA, 0.8 mg dm−3 2,4-D, and 600 mg dm−3 inositol [31]. The regeneration of callus was also achieved from young leaves cultured on a solidified MS medium supplemented with 1 mg dm−3 2,4-D and 0.1 mg dm−3 kinetin. On explants from young leaves bred on an MS medium without phytohormones, tumor induction was carried out through transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains A281 and B6S3. Hairy roots were induced with Agrobacterium rhizogenes strain A4. Tumor and capillary roots were maintained on a hormone-free MS medium [6].

3.2. Discussion of Volatile Compounds

In plants, volatile bundles are formed on a few pathways: shikimate/phenylalanine, lipoxygenase (LOX), mevalonate (MVA), and 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) [32,33]. The influence of chemical compounds and phytohormones on the biosynthesis of volatile compounds in plants has previously been widely studied [34,35,36].
Plants are a rich source of chemical compounds used in various branches of industry, i.e., pharmaceutical or agricultural. Recently, research has emerged on the use of volatile compounds for appetite regulation [37]. The same appetite-inhibiting volatile compounds—limonene and nonanal—and appetite-reducing volatile compounds—camphene, β-pinene, sabinene, and p-cymene—were also identified in the specie studied here. 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanone, at high doses, exhibit pesticidal properties against a range of invertebrate pests [38]. Commonly, they kill or repel juvenile entomopathogenic nematodes [39]. These substances show potential for use in future crop protection, as they exhibit a variety of interactions with invertebrates [40]. α-pinene exerts neuroprotective effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic mechanisms [41]. Studies have shown that olfactory stimulation with α-pinene induces physiological relaxation [42]. In addition, it shows anticancer, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-leishmania, anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, neuroprotective, gastroprotective, antiapoptotic, antitumor, antimetastatic, insecticidal, and nematicidal properties [43,44,45]. α-selinene is found in large quantities in the composition of plant oils, exhibiting anticancer properties, as well as antioxidant, antifungal, and pharmacological activities [46,47,48,49,50]. Studies have shown that camphene regulated lipid metabolism; it can be identified for use in the treatment of lipid muscle atrophy, achieving controlled skeletal muscle atrophy, and also reducing plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in hyperlipidemic rats [51,52]. In addition, it exhibits anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, hypolipidemic, anti-cancer, antiparasitic, antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant, antiviral and anti- leishmania properties, plus some enzyme inhibitory activity [53].
Our studies showed the largest amounts for the volatile compounds of 1-octen-3-ol, 3-octanol, α-pinene, α-selinene, and campenein in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”. 1-octen-3-ol is used as a food additive. It is used as an attractant for insects such as tsetse flies, Anopheles, and Aedes mosquitoes [54,55]. Moreover, it reduces brown rot and the development of the plant fungal pathogen Monilinia fructicola (G. Winter) Honey, as well as induces some defense genes in plants [56,57]. 3-octanone can be sued as a lure and kill agent for the control of the brown garden snail [58].
Among the volatile compounds identified by another research team in the essential oil from an unknown variety of C. scutellarioides, the following occurred at the highest quantities: phytol, germacrene-D, caryophyllene, neophytadiene, Δ-cadinene, α-humulene, 6,10,14-trimethyl-2-pentadecanone, and copaene [14]. In the essential oil from leaves of another undefined genotype of C. scutellarioides, the following constituents showed a profuse representation: spathulenol, germacrene-D, bicyclogermacrene, nonacosan, and morillol [15]. During a GC-MS analysis of a C. scutellarioides methanol extract, the highest contents of furfural, 4H-pyran-4-on, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxyl-6-methylo-, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, phytol and phenol, and 2,2′-methylenebis [6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-methyl- were identified, among others [59].
Over the years, studies have been published concerning the effect of phytohormones on changes in the intensity of biosynthesis of plant compounds. Thus, 6-benzylaminopurine (BA) was found to enhance the production of volatile organic compounds in the rose, Korean mint Agastache rugosa (Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Kuntze, peppermint Mentha piperita L., and Lantana camara L. [60,61,62,63]. It also improves the production of secondary metabolites such as menthon, menthol, menthofuran, and pulegone in Mentha piperita [62]. Other research on peppermint confirmed its stimulating effect on menthon [64]. In the species Mexican oregano Lippia origanoides Kunth, BA stimulated the biosynthesis of myrcene and p-cymene and increased the overall monoterpenes content but caused a drop in the content of carvone [65]. Microplantlets of the Cassumunar ginger (Zingiber montanum (J. Koenig) Link ex A. Dietr.) cultivated on a medium enriched with BAP produced higher amounts of 2,4-D methyl ester, linoleic acid methyl ester, dodecane, and 3-tert-butylphenol [66]. Furthermore, BAP was reported to increase the contents of fatty and unsaturated acids in the niger Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass, whereas in Malus sieversii (Ledeb.) M.Roem., it was found to inhibit the biosynthesis of anthocyanins [67,68].
Fluridone has an inhibiting effect on the biosynthesis of carotenoids [69]. The lack of carotenoids negatively affects the formation of cell membranes and contributes to leaf whitening. This negative effect is irreversible, but the newly formed leaves of Cyathea delgadii Sternb., when transferred onto a substratum devoid of fluridone, became green and fully functional [69,70]. Fluridone inhibits the desaturation of phytoene and disrupts seed dormancy [71]. There are many studies on fluridone which indicate that it is an inhibitor of the biosynthesis of ABA [72,73,74]. Moreover, it has been observed to delay the accumulation of anthocyanins in the European blueberry Vaccinium myrtillus L. [74]. Alas, the number of studies that pertain to the impact of fluridone on the biosynthesis of plant compounds is negligible, and therefore, they are not sufficient to determine the specific mechanism of how this phytohormone affects the organic compound biosynthetic pathways. Nevertheless, taking into account the reports of its impact on carotenoids, phytoene, and ABA, one can draw a conclusion that fluridone influences the plastid methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, which is one of the biosynthetic pathways of terpenes.
The application of naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was found to trigger an increase in the production of volatile compounds and flower oil in species representing the genus Rosa L. [61,75]. Addtionally, NAA enhances the biosynthesis of carvone in Croton floribundus Spreng. [76]. In the case of the muskmelon Cucumis melo L., supplementation with NAA intensified the production of different carotenes, which are responsible for the vivid coloration of the fruit and its nutritive value. This phytohormone was recorded to stimulate the synthesis of such carotenes as beta-carotene, lycopene, and lutein [77]. It was also reported to improve the production of anthraquinone in the callus of the noni Morinda citrifolia Zenk [78].
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) improves the biosynthesis of volatile organic compounds in Korean mint Agastache rugosa [63]. It enhances the photosynthetic efficiency, and improves the contents of essential oils, phenol, and flavonoids in the holy basil Ocimum tenuiflorum L. [79]. Moreover, this phytohormone significantly increases the amounts of particular phenolic compounds in plant organs in apple mint Mentha rotundifolia L. [80]. In Mexican oregano Lippia origanoides Kunth, IAA increases the content of carvacrol [65], whereas in sweet wormwood Artemisia annua L., it improves the biosynthesis of artemisinin and increases the trichome density [81]. Furthermore, it improves the photosynthetic process and biosynthesis of polysaccharides in Chlorococcum humicola, a species of green algae [82], and increases the contents of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids, and metabolites in algae Euglena sp. [83].
Other compounds which act as plant growth hormones also affect the processes of biosynthesis of volatile compounds. Supplementation with gibberellins was recorded to induce quantitative changes in 1,8-cineole in the common sage Salvia officinalis L. [84]. Methyl jasmonate brought about changes in the amounts of linalool and β-ocymene in the upland cotton Gossypium hirsutum L. [85], whereas triacontanol was found responsible for differences in the contents of menthol, isomentone, L-mentone, and methyl acetate in the wild mint Mentha arvensis L. [86].
Similarly, the present research reveals the impact of plant growth regulators on the quantitative changes in specific volatile compounds and on the modification of the volatile compound profile in plants.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Micropropagation

The initial material was composed of overground parts of C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”, coming from the Lower Silesia Agri-Food Wholesale Center (Pl. Dolnośląskie Centrum Hurtu Rolno-Spożywczego S.A.). For induction of in vitro cultures, fragments of stems with nodes were used. Prior to proper disinfection, the plant fragments were treated with a detergent solution and then with 70% ethanol. The disinfection proper was carried out with the use of a Javel solution (1 volume of Javel to 3 volumes of sterile water), with which the primary explants were treated for 10 min. Subsequently, the plant fragments were rinsed three times in sterile water for 5, 8, and 12 min. The thus prepared material was introduced into the MS medium (Murashige and Skoog) [87] basic medium, with an addition of 30 g dm−3 of saccharose, and solidified with agar of pH = 5.8 before autoclaving. The cultures were left in the breeding room (21 °C, photoperiod 16/8). The acquisition of material for the experiment was performed through the cloning of C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” on the MS basic medium, without plant growth regulators. The plants were transferred to a fresh medium every fourth week. Next, the cultivation was conducted on the MS breeding medium, supplemented with 30 g dm−3 of saccharose, and solidified with agar at pH = 5.8, with five consecutive plant growth regulators at a dose of 0.5 g dm−3. These were BA (6-benzylaminopurine), 2iP (2-isopentyladenine), IAA (indole-3-acetic acid), NAA (naphthyl-1-acetic acid), and fluridone, and to the control, MS medium without phytohormones added, was applied. To each basic medium, 30 g dm−3 of saccharose and 8 g dm−3 of agar were added, whereas the pH was raised up to 5.8 before autoclaving. The experiment was set up in five replications. A single replication covered five nodal explants in a breeding vessel. After seven weeks, the plants were subjected to phenotypic analysis for the following traits: the length of roots (in cm), the length of the overground part (in cm), and the number of roots and shoots.

4.2. Chemical Compounds Analysis—Aroma Profiling

By comminuting the material with a scalpel, homogeneous samples of leaves and shoots from plants bred under varied in vitro conditions and from a plant cultivated in vivo (the source plant from which in vitro culture had been induced) were obtained. The analysis of volatile compounds was not carried out on plants from in vitro cultures enriched with 2iP due to the small amount of plant material obtained. Volatile compound profiling was performed using a gas chromatograph coupled with a mass spectroscope (single quadrupole mass spectrometer, gas chromatograph Shimadzu GC-MS QP 2020, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The solid-phase microextraction SPME-ARROW-type fiber, a mixture of divinylbenzene, carboxene WR and polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/C-WR/PDMS), was applied. The analysis was carried out in three replications. Each sample (~500 mg of fresh plant material, respectively) was placed in a head-space-type vial with a volume of 20 mL, with 10 μL of 2-undecanone (10,000 ppm) as the internal standard (IS). Before extraction, the samples were preincubated for 5 min at a temperature of 60 °C. The extraction of volatile compounds was carried out at 60 °C for 30 min. Desorption of the extracted volatile part was conducted in an injection device for 3 min. The injector temperature equaled 250 °C. As the carrier gas, helium was used at a flow of 1.0 mL min−1, with split 10. Separation was accomplished using a Zebron ZB-5 capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm of stationary phase; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The temperature protocol for the column was as follows: 50 °C, increase by 4.0 °C min−1 up to 130 °C, then 10 °C min−1 up to 240 °C. The MS analysis was performed with the use of scans from 40 to 300 m/z and with the application of electron ionization (EI) at 70 eV. The analysis was carried out in three replications.
Experimental retention indices of the identified compounds, calculated on the basis of the mixture of n-alkanes C6–C30 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), were obtained. Identification of the compounds was performed through a comparison of the obtained retention indices with the literature retention indices for chemical compounds, and the mass spectra acquired were referred to the mass spectra available from the libraries (NIST 17 Mass Spectral and Retention Index Libraries (NIST17) and NIST WebBook) and the pertinent literature [88]. Semi-quantitative Polyrandom marking was carried out for each compound through normalization of the peak surface and calculations based on the amount of the internal standard added. For the semiquantative evaluation, standard curves were not employed for any of the compounds found in the samples. Concentrations of the internal standard were compared with the concentrations of other compounds, adopting the overall coefficient of equipment response equaling 1 for all the volatile compounds detected.
The percentage shares of the specific compounds were calculated from the surface of all the obtained peaks. The mass of the specific volatile compounds was expressed as related to the amount of the internal standard added to each sample under study.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

The results were expressed as a mean for each replication, and standard deviation values (±SD) were calculated (Supplementary Table S1). One-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed in order to verify the lack of significant effect of the phytohormones supplemented to the in vitro cultures on the morphological traits of the plants and on the chemical composition in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”. Under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, the hypothesis assumed a lack of influence of the applied breeding medium on the chemical composition of the plants. Significant differences were estimated at the level of 0.05 and 0.01. When the variance analysis yielded a significant result, the Tukey significant difference test (HSD) was carried out in order to compare the mean values [89]. The outcome was subjected to statistical analysis with the help of Statistica program version 13.3. A matrix of correlation coefficients was calculated using Statistica program version 13.3 to show trends in the amounts of volatile compounds observed due to the supplementation of plant growth regulators.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/molecules29102193/s1, Table S1. Matrix of correlation coefficients for the dependence of the synthesis of the analyzed volatile compounds on the cultivation conditions—the presence of applied phytohormones in relation to in vitro control conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J. and R.G.; methodology, J.Ł., R.G. and A.S.; software, M.J. and R.G.; validation, J.Ł., R.G. and A.S.; formal analysis M.J.; investigation, M.J. and J.Ł.; resources, J.Ł., R.G. and A.S.; data curation, M.J. and J.Ł.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J., J.Ł. and R.G.; writing—review and editing, M.J., J.Ł. and R.G.; supervision, R.G. and A.S.; project administration, R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC is financed by Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material or data is available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Paton, A.J.; Mwanyambo, M.; Govaerts, R.H.A.; Smitha, K.; Suddee, S.; Phillipson, P.B.; Wilson, T.C.; Forster, P.I.; Culham, A. Nomenclatural changes in Coleus and Plectranthus (Lamiaceae): A tale of more than two genera. PhytoKeys 2019, 129, 1–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paton, A.J.; Mwanyambo, M.; Culham, A. Phylogenetic study of Plectranthus, Coleus and allies (Lamiaceae): Taxonomy, distribution and medicinal use. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2018, 188, 355–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Plectranthus Scutellarioides. Available online: http://www.missouribotanicalgarden.org (accessed on 15 March 2023).
  4. Hyam, R.; Pankhurst, R.J. Plants and Their Names: A Concise Dictionary, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1995; p. 399. [Google Scholar]
  5. Rață, G.; Sala, F.; Samfira, I. Agricultural English, 1st ed.; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; p. 191. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauer, N.; Vuković, R.; Likić, S.; Jelaska, S. Potential of Different Coleus blumei Tissues for Rosmarinic Acid Production. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 53, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ayu, A.C.; Ida, M.; Moelyono, M.; Fakhriati, S.G. Total Anthocyanin Content and Identification of Anthocyanidin From Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R. Br Leaves. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2018, 22, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cretton, S.; Saraux, N.; Monteillier, A.; Righi, D.; Marcourt, L.; Genta-Jouve, G.; Wolfender, J.L.; Cuendet, M.; Christen, P. Anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative diterpenoids from Plectranthus scutellarioides. Phytochemistry 2018, 154, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ito, T.; Rakainsa, S.K.; Nisa, K.; Morita, H. Three new abietane-type diterpenoids from the leaves of Indonesian Plectranthus scutellarioides. Fitoterapia 2018, 127, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Moektiwardoyo, M.; Levita, J.; Sidiq, S.P.; Ahmad, K.; Mustarichie, R.; Subarnas, A.; Supriyatna, A. The determination of quercetin in Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br. leaves extract and its In SilicoStudy on Histamine H4 Receptor. Maj. Farm. Indones. 2011, 22, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  11. Osman, A.R. Genetic Variability and total phenolic compounds among six Coleus blumei varieties using RAPD Analysis. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2013, 9, 1395–1400. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mariano, H.A.L.; Sucaldito, D.R.; Atienza, T.V. Phytochemical Screening and Partial Characterization through GC-MS of Leaf Crude Extract of Plectranthus scutellarioides (Mayana), and Plectranthus amboinicus (Oregano) and Their Larvicidal Activity Against 2nd–3rd Instar Larvae of Aedes aegypti in Comparison to Azadirachta indica. In Proceedings of the DLSU Research Congress. De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines, 20–22 June 2017; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Moron, M.L.; Acero, L.H. Mayana (Coleus blumei) Leaves Ointment in Wound Healing of Albino Rats (Rattus albus). Int. J. Food Eng. 2017, 3, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mustarichie, R.; Moektiwardojo, M.; Dewi, W.A. Isolation, Identification, and Characteristic of Essential Oil of Iler (Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br leaves. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017, 9, 2218–2223. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aziz, P.; Muhammad, N.; Intisar, A.; Abid, M.A.; Din, M.I.; Yaseen, M.; Kousar, R.; Aamir, A.; Ejaz, Q.; Ejaz, R. Constituents and antibacterial activity of leaf essential oil of Plectranthus scutellarioides. Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2021, 155, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karo, M.B.; Hatta, M.; Patellongi, I.; Natzir, R.; Tambaip, T. IgM antibody and colony fungal load impacts of orally administered ethanol extract of Plectranthus scutellarioides on mice with systemic candidiasis. J. Pharm. Pharmacogn. Res. 2018, 6, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Moektiwardoyo, M.; Rositah, S.; Kusuma, A.F. Immunostimulatory activity of Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R.Br. leaves ethanolic extract and its fraction on rat using carbon clearance method. Drug Invent. Today 2019, 11, 2990–2995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Prabowo, Y.; Saptarini, N.M.; Sumiwi, S.A.; Levita, J.; Wicaksono, I.A.; Moektiwardoyo, M. Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) Reduces the Rectal Temperature of Diphteria-Pertussis-Tetanus Vaccine-Induced Mice. Pharmacol. Clin. Pharm. Res. 2019, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ragas, C.Y.; Templora, V.F.; Rideout, J.A. Diastereomeric Diterpenes from Coleus blumei. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 49, 927–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Salaeh, A.; Augusti, R.S.; Susilawati, Y.; Sumiwi, S.A.; Moektiwardojo, M. Antidiabetic Activity of Fractions and Subfraction of Iler [Plectranthus scutellarioides (L.) R. Br.] Leaves on Diabetic Mice Induced by Alloxan. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2018, 22, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Astuti, A.D.; Yasir, B.; Subehan; Alam, G. Comparison of two varieties of Plectranthus scutellarioides based on extraction method, phytochemical compound, and cytotoxicity. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1341, 072012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bourdy, G.; Walter, A. Maternity and medicinal plants in Vanuatu I. The cycle of reproduction. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1992, 37, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cordero, C.; Ligsay, A.; Alejandro, G. Ethnobotanical documentation of medicinal plants used by the Ati tribe in Malay, Aklan, Philippines. J. Complement. Med. Res. 2020, 11, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Satrija, F.; Retnani, E.B.; Ridwan, Y.; Tiuria, R. Potential Use of Herbal Anthelmintics as Alternative Antiparasitic Drugs for Small Holder Farms in Developing Countries. Livestock Community and Environment. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Association of Institutions for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20–23 August 2001; Kyvsgaard, N.C., Monrad, J., Eds.; Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Clinical Studies and Department of Animal Science and Animal Health: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zakaria, Z.; Aziz, R.; Lachimanan, Y.L.; Sreenivasan, S.; Rathinam, X. Antioxidant Activity of Coleus blumei, Orthosiphon Stamineus, Ocimum basilicum and Mentha arvensis from Lamiaceae Family. Int. J. Nat. Eng. Sci. 2008, 2, 93–95. [Google Scholar]
  26. Thiem, B.; Kikowska, G. Zapewnienie jakości roślin leczniczych rozmnażanych w kulturach in vitro. Herba Pol. 2008, 54, 168–178. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cho, K.H.; Laux, V.Y.; Wallace-Springer, N.; Clark, D.G.; Folta, K.M.; Colquhoun, T.A. Effects of Light Quality on Vegetative Cutting and In Vitro Propagation of Coleus (Plectranthus scutellarioides). HortScience 2019, 54, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ibrahim, K.M.; Musbah, H.M. Increasing poly phenols in Coleus blumei at the cellular and intact plant levels using PEG stress. Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 2018, 11, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Medina, T.; Lourdes, B.; Cardenas, L.B. Comparative Culture Response of Three Coleus blumei Benth. Varieties As Basis For Explant Selection for Callus Induction. J. Nat. Stud. 2017, 16, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sahu, R.; Dewanjee, S. Differential physiological and biochemical responses under variable culture conditions in micro-propagated Solenostemon scutellarioides: An important ornamental plant. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2012, 2, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qian, J.; Liu, G.; Liu, X.; Han, X.; Liu, H. Influence of growth regulators and sucrose concentrations on growth and rosmarinic acid production in calli and suspension cultures of Coleus blumei. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vranová, E.; Coman, D.; Gruissem, W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 665–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytologist. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Prins, C.L.; Vieira, I.J.; Freitas, S.P. Growth regulators and essential oil production. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 22, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jamwal, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Puri, S. Plant growth regulator mediated consequences of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 9, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nagegowda, D.A.; Gupta, P. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and metabolic engineering of plant specialized terpenoids. Plant Sci. 2020, 294, 110457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Łyczko, J.; Godyla-Jabłoński, M.; Pachura, N.; Adamenko, K.; Klemens, M.; Szumny, A. Natural Appetite Control: Consumer Perception of Food-Based Appetite Regulating Aromas. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bourdon, P.A.; Zottele, M.; Zafar, Z.; Baxter, I.; Midthassel, A.; Myrta, A.; Wechselberger, K.F.; Strasser, H.; Butt, T.M. Behavioral response of three subterranean pests (Agriotes lineatus, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Phyllopertha horticola) to the fungal volatile organic compounds 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanone. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2023, 17, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hummadi, E.H.; Dearden, A.; Generalovic, T.; Clunie, B.; Harrott, A.; Cetin, Y.; Demirbek, M.; Khoja, S.; Eastwood, D.; Dudley, E.; et al. Volatile organic compounds of Metarhizium brunneum influence the efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes in insect control. Biol. Control 2021, 155, 104527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tonks, A.J.; Roberts, J.M.; Midthassel, A.; Pope, T. Exploiting volatile organic compounds in crop protection: A systematic review of 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanone. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2023, 183, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Khoshnazar, M.; Parvardeh, S.; Bigdeli, M.R. Alpha-pinene exerts neuroprotective effects via anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic mechanisms in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020, 29, 104977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ikei, H.; Song, C.; Miyazaki, Y. Effects of olfactory stimulation by α-pinene on autonomic nervous activity. J. Wood Sci. 2016, 62, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Chen, R.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y. α-Pinene inhibits human prostate cancer growth in a mouse xenograft model. Chemotherapy 2018, 63, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Salehi, B.; Upadhyay, S.; Erdogan Orhan, I.; Kumar Jugran, A.; Jayaweera, S.L.D.; Dias, D.A.; Sharopov, F.; Taheri, Y.; Martins, N.; Baghalpour, N.; et al. Therapeutic potential of α-and β-pinene: A miracle gift of nature. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Allenspach, M.; Steuer, C. α-Pinene: A never-ending story. Phytochemistry 2021, 190, 112857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pragadheesh, V.S.; Saroj, A.; Yadav, A.; Samad, A.; Chanotiya, C.S. Compositions, enantiomer characterization and antifungal activity of two Ocimum essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Oladimeji, A.O.; Babatunde, O.; Musa, R.T.; M’civer, F.A.; Lawal, A.T.; Ogunwande, I.A. GC-MS analysis and cytotoxic activity of essential oils from the leaves of Abrus precatorius L. Gaertn. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2016, 6, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rojas-Armas, J.P.; Arroyo-Acevedo, J.L.; Palomino-Pacheco, M.; Ortiz-Sánchez, J.M.; Calva, J.; Justil-Guerrero, H.J.; Castro-Luna, A.; Ramos-Cevallos, N.; Cieza-Macedo, E.C.; Herrera-Calderon, O. Phytochemical constituents and ameliorative effect of the essential oil from Annona muricata L. leaves in a murine model of breast cancer. Molecules 2022, 27, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jena, S.; Ray, A.; Sahoo, A.; Das, P.K.; Dash, K.T.; Kar, S.K.; Nayak, S.; Panda, P.C. Chemical composition and biological activities of leaf essential oil of Syzygium myrtifolium from eastern India. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2021, 24, 582–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chandra, M.; Prakash, O.; Kumar, R.; Bachheti, R.K.; Bhushan, B.; Kumar, M.; Pant, A.K. β-Selinene-rich essential oils from the parts of Callicarpa macrophylla and their antioxidant and pharmacological activities. Medicines 2017, 4, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Vallianou, I.; Peroulis, N.; Pantazis, P.; Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M. Camphene, a plant-derived monoterpene, reduces plasma cholesterol and triglycerides in hyperlipidemic rats independently of HMG-CoA reductase activity. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 20516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Baek, S.; Kim, J.; Moon, B.S.; Park, S.M.; Jung, D.E.; Kang, S.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, S.J.; Kwon, S.H.; Nam, M.H.; et al. Camphene attenuates skeletal muscle atrophy by regulating oxidative stress and lipid metabolism in rats. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hachlafi, N.E.; Aanniz, T.; Menyiy, N.E.; Baaboua, A.E.; Omari, N.E.; Balahbib, A.; Shariat, M.A.; Zengin, G.; Fikri-Benbrahim, K.; Bouyahya, A. In vitro and in vivo biological investigations of camphene and its mechanism insights: A review. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 1799–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hall, D.R.; Beevor, P.S.; Cork, A.; Nesbitt, B.F.; Vale, G.A. 1-Octen-3-ol: A potent olfactory stimulant and attractant for tsetse isolated from cattle odours. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 1984, 5, 335–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kline, D.L.; Allan, S.A.; Bernier, U.R.; Welch, C.H. Evaluation of the enantiomers of 1-octen-3-ol and 1-octyn-3-ol as attractants for mosquitoes associated with a freshwater swamp in Florida, USA. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2007, 21, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, X.; Huang, M.; Peng, Y.; Yang, W.; Shi, J. Antifungal activity of 1-octen-3-ol against Monilinia fructicola and its ability in enhancing disease resistance of peach fruit. Food Control 2022, 135, 108804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kishimoto, K.; Matsui, K.; Ozawa, R.; Takabayashi, J. Volatile 1-octen-3-ol induces a defensive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2007, 73, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yavasoglu, S.İ.; Wood, M.J.; Alkhaibari, A.M.; Touray, M.; Butt, T. Potential of 3-octanone as a lure and kill agent for control of the Brown garden snail. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2023, 198, 107920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Taher, M.; El-Daly, N.; El-Khateeb, A.Y.; Hassan, S.; Elsherbiny, E.A. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, Antitumor and Antifungal Activities of Methanolic Extracts of Coleus blumei, Plectranthus amboinicus and Salvia splendens (Lamiaceae). J. Agric. Chem. Biotechnol. 2021, 12, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Affonso, V.R.; Bizzo, H.R.; Lima, S.S.D.; Esquibel, M.A.; Sato, A. Solid phase microextraction (SPME) analysis of volatile compounds produced by in vitro shoots of Lantana camara L. under the influence of auxins and cytokinins. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2007, 18, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ibrahim, M.; Agarwal, M.; Yang, J.O.; Abdulhussein, M.; Du, X.; Hardy, G.; Ren, Y. Plant Growth Regulators Improve the Production of Volatile Organic Compounds in Two Rose Varieties. Plants 2019, 8, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Łyczko, J.; Piotrowski, K.; Kolasa, K.; Galek, R.; Szumny, A. Mentha piperita L. Micropropagation and the Potential Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Volatile Organic Compound Composition. Molecules 2020, 25, 2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zielińska, S.; Piątczak, E.; Kalemba, D.; Matkowski, A. Influence of plant growth regulators on volatiles produced by in vitro grown shoots of Agastache rugosa (Fischer & C.A.Meyer) O. Kuntze. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 107, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  64. Khanam, D.; Mohammad, F. Effect of structurally different plant growth regulators (PGRs) on the concentration, yield, and constituents of peppermint essential oil. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants 2017, 23, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Castilho, C.V.V.; Leitão, S.G.; Silva, V.D.; Miranda, C.D.O.; Santos, M.C.D.S.; Bizzo, H.R.; Silva, N.C.B.D. In vitro propagation of a carvacrol-producing type of Lippia origanoides Kunth: A promising oregano-like herb. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rajkumari, S.; Sanatombi, K. Secondary metabolites content and essential oil composition of in vitro cultures of Zingiber montanum (Koenig) Link ex A. Dietr. Biotechnol. Lett. 2020, 42, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Talukdar, M.; Swain, D.K.; Bhadoria, P.B.S. Effect of IAA and BAP application in varying concentration on seed yield and oil quality of Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2022, 67, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ji, X.H.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, R.; Wu, S.J.; An, M.M.; Li, M.; Wang, C.Z.; Chen, X.L.; Zhing, Y.M.; Chen, X.S. Effect of auxin, cytokinin and nitrogen on anthocyanin biosynthesis in callus cultures of red-fleshed apple (Malus sieversii f. niedzwetzkyana). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 120, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Popova, L. Effect of fluridone on plant development and stress-induced ABA accumulation in Vicia faba L. plants. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 21, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
  70. Grzyb, M.; Kalandyk, A.; Mikuła, A. Effect of TIBA, fluridone and salicylic acid on somatic embryogenesis and endogenous hormone and sugar contents in the tree fern Cyathea delgadii Sternb. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goggin, D.E.; Powles, S.B. Fluridone: A combination germination stimulant and herbicide for problem fields? Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1418–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mialoundama, A.S.; Heintz, D.; Debayle, D.; Rahier, A.; Camara, B.; Bouvier, F. Abscisic acid negatively regulates elicitor-induced synthesis of capsidiol in wild tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1556–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Farias-Soares, F.L.; Steiner, N.; Schmidt, É.C.; Pereira, M.L.; Rogge-Renner, G.D.; Bouzon, Z.L.; Floh, E.S.I.; Guerra, M.P. The transition of proembryogenic masses to somatic embryos in Araucaria angustifolia (Bertol.) Kuntze is related to the endogenous contents of IAA, ABA and polyamines. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 1853–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Karppinen, K.; Tegelberg, P.; Häggman, H.; Jaakola, L. Abscisic acid regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis and gene expression associated with cell wall modification in ripening bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 406326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Saffari, V.R.; Khalighi, A.H.M.A.D.; Lesani, H.O.S.S.E.I.N.; Babalar, M.E.S.B.A.H.; Obermaier, J.F. Effects of different plant growth regulators and time of pruning on yield components of Rosa damascena Mill. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2004, 6, 1040–1042. [Google Scholar]
  76. da Silva, B.O.; Amaral, A.C.F.; Ferreira, J.L.P.; Santiago, L.J.M.; Louro, R.P. Micropropagation and in vitro production of secondary metabolites of Croton floribundus Spreng. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Morais, D.R.; Rotta, E.M.; Sargi, S.C.; Bonafe, E.G.; Suzuki, R.M.; Souza, N.E.; Matsushita, M.; Visentainer, J.V. Proximate composition, mineral contents and fatty acid composition of the different parts and dried peels of tropical fruits cultivated in Brazil. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2017, 28, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Evans, W.C. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy, 16th ed.; Sauders Elsevier: Edinburgh, UK, 2009; p. 94. [Google Scholar]
  79. Khan, M.M.A.; Quasar, N.; Afreen, R. Nanotized form of indole acetic acid improve biochemical activities, the ultrastructure of glandular trichomes and essential oil production in Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 193, 116117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kecis, H.; Bagues, M.; Abdelouhab, Y.; Mekircha, F.; Gali, L.; Kadi, K.; Addad, D.; Nagaz, K.; Brahmi, F.; Kouba, Y. Different indole-3-acetic acid and 6 benzyl amino purine concentrations affect biomass, phenolic profile, and bioactivity in Mentha rotundifolia L. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 4551–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, C.; Zheng, Y.; Tong, F.; Zhang, L.; Lu, R.; Pan, X.; Tan, H.; et al. Effects of exogenous indole-3-acetic acid on the density of trichomes, expression of artemisinin biosynthetic genes, and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2023, 70, 1870–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yu, X.; Zhao, J.; Song, M.; Li, R.; Yang, Y.; Ye, X.; Chen, X. Analysis of the mechanism of exogenous indole-3-acetic acid on the enrichment of d-glucose in Chlorococcum humicola cultured by sludge extracts. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 902, 166124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hakim, W.H.A.; Erfianti, T.; Dhiaurahman, A.N.; Maghfiroh, K.Q.; Amelia, R.; Nurafifah, I.; Kurnianto, D.; Siswanti, D.U.; Suyono, E.A.; Marno, S.; et al. The Effect of IAA Phytohormone (Indole-3-Acetic Acid) on the Growth, Lipid, Protein, Carbohydrate, and Pigment Content in Euglena sp. Malays. J. Fundam. Appl. Sci. 2023, 19, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Schmiderer, C.; Grausgruber-Gröger, S.; Grassi, P.; Steinborn, R.; Novak, J. Influence of gibberellin and daminozide on the expression of terpene synthases and on monoterpenes in common sage (Salvia officinalis). J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rodriguez-Saona, C.; Crafts-Brandner, S.J.; ParÉ, P.W.; Henneberry, T.J. Exogenous methyl jasmonate induces volatile emissions in cotton plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 679–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Naeem, M.M.M.A.; Khan, M.M.A.; Moinuddin; Idrees, M.; Aftab, T. Triacontanol-mediated regulation of growth and other physiological attributes, active constituents and yield of Mentha arvensis L. Plant Growth Regul. 2011, 65, 195–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F.A. Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assays with Tobacco Tissue Cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oils by Ion Trap Mass Spectroscopy; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  89. Abdi, H.; Williams, L.J. Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) Test. Encycl. Res. Des. 2010, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” cultivated in vitro under different conditions. (a)—MS control medium; (b)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 BA; (c)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 2iP; (d)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 fluridone; (e)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 NAA; (f)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 IAA. M. Jakobina.
Figure 1. C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” cultivated in vitro under different conditions. (a)—MS control medium; (b)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 BA; (c)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 2iP; (d)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 fluridone; (e)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 NAA; (f)—MS + 0.5 mg dm−3 IAA. M. Jakobina.
Molecules 29 02193 g001
Figure 2. Influence of cultivation conditions on the growth of C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” explants (a) influence of supplementation with plant growth regulators on the root length and shoot length; (b) influence of addition of phytohormones on the number of roots and shoots. Values followed by a different letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test). ns—not significant.
Figure 2. Influence of cultivation conditions on the growth of C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” explants (a) influence of supplementation with plant growth regulators on the root length and shoot length; (b) influence of addition of phytohormones on the number of roots and shoots. Values followed by a different letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test). ns—not significant.
Molecules 29 02193 g002
Figure 3. Contents of volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” tissues: (ac) contents of volatile compounds in plants cultivated under in vivo and in vitro conditions, without plant growth regulators. Values followed by a different letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test).
Figure 3. Contents of volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” tissues: (ac) contents of volatile compounds in plants cultivated under in vivo and in vitro conditions, without plant growth regulators. Values followed by a different letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test).
Molecules 29 02193 g003
Figure 4. Contents of volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” tissues: (ac) contents of volatile compounds in plants cultivated in vitro with an addition of plant growth regulators as compared with those of the control.
Figure 4. Contents of volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime” tissues: (ac) contents of volatile compounds in plants cultivated in vitro with an addition of plant growth regulators as compared with those of the control.
Molecules 29 02193 g004
Table 1. Impact of cultivation conditions on the number and quantity of volatile compounds per standard in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”.
Table 1. Impact of cultivation conditions on the number and quantity of volatile compounds per standard in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”.
Quantity of a Compound per Internal Standard [µg g−1]
Time [min]CompoundLiterature Retention IndexCalculated Retention IndexCultivation Conditions
In VivoControl In VitroBA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
Fluridone
[0.5 mg dm−3]
NAA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
IAA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
6.42-Hexenal822838-15.57 ± 2.39 nm2.51 ± 0.18 n5.01 ± 1.65 n17.31 ± 3.24 nm13.48 ± 4.66 nm
6.43-Hexen-1-ol83883946.78 ± 9.80 nml119.66 ± 12.17 nmlk41.40 ± 4.98 nml68.85 ± 13.08 nml144.78 ± 15.83 nmlkj92.11 ± 17.75 nmlk
6.72-Hexen-1-ol862857-52.49 ± 17.68 nml4.12 ± 0.37 n12.39 ± 1.87 nm44.37 ± 7.67 nml23.84 ± 8.23 nml
6.81-Hexanol8688586.55 ± 1.09 n30.84 ± 4.59 nml17.36 ± 0.87 nm17.02 ± 3.75 nm39.50 ± 5.76 nml28.91 ± 4.29 nml
8.9α-Pinene935940458.43 ± 31.24 nmlkjihg590.82 ± 156.90 nmlkjihg665.35 ± 99.54 mlkjihgf833.88 ± 214.03 hgf637.49 ± 156.23 nmlkjihgf329.15 ± 51.61 nmlkjih
9.4Camphene9539553.28 ± 1.55 n13.70 ± 1.35 nm55.74 ± 45.13 nml38.26 ± 6.49 nml90.07 ± 33.07 nmlk135.59 ± 25.74 nmlk
10.4Sabinen976979202.69 ± 37.45 nmlkjih121.62 ± 36.26 nmlk139.29 ± 40.54 nmlk367.97 ± 108.69 nmlkjih122.85 ± 35.01 nmlk115.71 ± 24.83 nmlk
10.5β-pinene97898184.47 ± 6.91 nmlk95.96 ± 24.65 nmlk131.44 ± 33.74 nmlk145.78 ± 34.80 nmlkj123.57 ± 27.51 nmlk98.22 ± 15.12 nmlk
10.61-Octen-3-ol982984433.11 ± 41.43 nmlkjih3953.76 ± 486.22 b2772.06 ± 100.49 d3494.34 ± 497.67 cb4815.90 ± 882.53 a2882.59 ± 469.36 dc
10.93-Octanone98999023.31 ± 6.69 nml111.03 ± 8.66 nmlk41.88 ± 2.41 nml92.63 ± 15.94 nmlk149.26 ± 15.23 nmlkj153.91 ± 34.77 nmlkji
11.0β-Myrcene99299410.46 ± 1.12 nm18.13 ± 3.63 nm21.14 ± 4.71 nml24.61 ± 5.26 nml22.92 ± 2.79 nml19.52 ± 2.40 nm
11.23-Octanol995997143.98 ± 16.14 nmlkj1279.46 ± 211.98 fe461.19 ± 11.92 nmlkjihg1100.13 ± 112.90 gfe1674.66 ± 355.52 e808.82 ± 85.25 ihgf
11.5α-Phellandrene1002100648.66 ± 10.94 nml42.75 ± 11.06 nml18.03 ± 6.67 nm41.98 ± 15.16 nml22.17 ± 5.61 nml16.79 ± 3.28 nm
11.63-Hexen-1-ol acetate1005101035.75 ± 8.64 nml3.14 ± 0.83 n14.27 ± 12.09 nm1.45 ± 0.34 n9.62 ± 0.79 nm7.43 ± 1.72 nm
12.2p-Cymene1026102929.24 ± 2.58 nml29.74 ± 6.76 nml21.47 ± 3.16 nml26.91 ± 5.20 nml22.05 ± 4.92 nml11.18 ± 1.53 nm
12.4Limonene1032103363.04 ± 6.72 nml75.27 ± 16.79 nmlk79.79 ± 19.49 nmlk106.95 ± 23.13 nmlk79.98 ± 16.67 nmlk71.81 ± 13.03 nmlk
12.5Eucalyptol103310360.96 ± 0.29 n2.71 ± 0.62 n5.13 ± 0.80 n3.08 ± 0.61 n23.33 ± 19.23 nml4.87 ± 0.67 n
15.1Linalool1103110116.11 ± 1.50 nm61.27 ± 8.18 nml38.83 ± 4.98 nml97.84 ± 17.56 nmlk79.44 ± 15.77 nmlk78.16 ± 13.12 nmlk
15.3Nonanal1111110615.18 ± 4.83 nm15.39 ± 5.05 nm6.31 ± 0.49 n10.58 ± 1.81 nm6.97 ± 1.37 n10.33 ± 3.92 nm
21.9Bornyl acetate128412880.13 ± 0.06 n2.53 ± 1.46 n55.14 ± 53.56 nml7.61 ± 1.27 nm39.17 ± 27.01 nml158.20 ± 34.67 nmlkji
24.4Cyclosativene136813767.94 ± 3.67 nm17.28 ± 3.91 nm16.26 ± 1.95 nm28.74 ± 5.31 nml18.55 ± 0.93 nm10.82 ± 2.03 nm
24.7Copaene13821383556.89 ± 64.50 nmlkjihg451.63 ± 65.62 nmlkjihg324.44 ± 18.68 nmlkjih439.41 ± 99.17 nmlkjih678.83 ± 112.12 lkjihgf474.52 ± 94.36 nmlkjihg
24.8Di-epi-α-cedrene138513894.79 ± 1.12 n6.65 ± 2.21 n4.47 ± 0.91 n2.36 ± 0.56 n15.60 ± 6.20 nm21.72 ± 4.98 nml
25.0β-Elemene1394139613.67 ± 5.64 nm29.52 ± 8.71 nml17.19 ± 4.94 nm59.44 ± 12.79 nml90.47 ± 11.29 nmlk77.86 ± 16.80 nmlk
25.5Santalene1417141816.13 ± 6.12 nm30.84 ± 7.95 nml29.43 ± 3.23 nml63.34 ± 16.39 nml48.10 ± 10.71 nml28.79 ± 5.26 nml
25.7Caryophyllene1424142868.19 ± 13.08 nml74.04 ± 15.96 nmlk37.80 ± 2.96 nml51.54 ± 6.10 nml124.70 ± 25.14 nmlk172.60 ± 32.90 nmlkji
26.2δ-Guaiene1452145572.10 ± 32.80 nmlk131.98 ± 29.36 nmlk119.01 ± 12.91 nmlk257.29 ± 67.63 nmlkjih188.24 ± 53.83 nmlkjih159.90 ± 30.39 nmlkji
26.8γ-Selinene1479148410.33 ± 1.40 nm18.36 ± 0.92 nm14.02 ± 0.03 nm18.69 ± 4.29 nm40.06 ± 4.64 nml38.07 ± 9.48 nml
26.9β-Chamigrene1776148811.74 ± 2.59 nm16.19 ± 4.02 nm8.35 ± 1.14 nm128.86 ± 44.60 nmlk16.27 ± 5.29 nm74.88 ± 19.32 nmlk
26.9Germacrene D1481149148.55 ± 8.57 nml47.91 ± 3.91 nml17.27 ± 0.46 nm29.51 ± 15.62 nml79.81 ± 10.28 nmlk87.15 ± 13.81 nmlk
27.2α-Selinene14941504239.47 ± 49.92 nmlkjih478.64 ± 65.16 nmlkjihg291.59 ± 4.57 nmlkjih588.20 ± 142.43 nmlkjihg798.35 ± 82.56 jihgf728.95 ± 139.46 kjihgf
27.2α-Muurolene149915088.41 ± 2.62 nm36.63 ± 16.23 nml19.02 ± 7.28 nm45.69 ± 17.47 nml45.02 ± 14.83 nml7.45 ± 1.46 nm
27.5γ i δ-Cadinene15131525168.25 ± 70.16 nmlk215.98 ± 81.53 nmlk118.72 ± 45.39 nml180.36 ± 70.28 nmlk269.68 ± 103.93 nmlkjih215.64 ± 87.24 nmlk
15241534
Values after which there is another letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test).
Table 2. Impact of cultivation conditions on the percentage share of particular volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”.
Table 2. Impact of cultivation conditions on the percentage share of particular volatile compounds in C. scutellarioides “Electric Lime”.
Content of Volatile Compounds [%]
Time
[min]
CompoundLiterature Retention IndexCalculated Retention IndexCultivation Conditions
In VivoControl In VitroBA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
Fluridon
[0.5 mg dm−3]
NAA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
IAA
[0.5 mg dm−3]
6.42-Hexenal822838-0.19 ± 0.03 Δz0.04 ± 0.00 Δ0.06 ± 0.01 Δ0.16 ± 0.02 Δb0.18 ± 0.05 Δzd
6.43-Hexen-1-ol8388391.54 ± 0.23 Δzyxwvtsr1.44 ± 0.12 Δzyxwvtsr0.73 ± 0.11 Δzyx0.80 ± 0.05 Δzyxw1.36 ± 0.07 Δzyxwvts1.25 ± 0.17 Δzyxwv
6.72-Hexen-1-ol862857-0.60 ± 0.14 Δzy0.07 ± 0.01 Δ0.15 ± 0.02 Δ0.42 ± 0.07 Δz0.31 ± 0.10 Δz
6.81-Hexanol8688580.21 ± 0.02 Δz0.37 ± 0.02 Δz0.30 ± 0.01 Δz0.19 ± 0.01 Δz0.37 ± 0.01 Δz0.39 ± 0.02 Δz
8.9α-Pinene93594015.63 ± 2.16 fe6.87 ± 1.49 nmlkj11.50 ± 0.96 ihgf9.38 ± 1.14 lkjih5.76 ± 0.70 urqponmlk4.53 ± 0.47 zyxwvutsrqponm
9.4Camphene9539550.11 ± 0.04 Δ0.17 ± 0.03 Δz0.88 ± 0.68 Δzyxw0.46 ± 0.07 Δzy0.86 ± 0.37 Δzyxw1.82 ± 0.06 Δzyxwvutsr
10.4Sabinen9769796.83 ± 1.19 nmlkj1.43 ± 0.42 Δzyxwvtsr2.36 ± 0.51 Δzyxwvutsrqpo4.10 ± 0.83 Δzyxwvutsrqponm1.10 ± 0.18 Δzyxwv1.60 ± 0.29 Δzyxwvtsr
10.5β-Pinene9789812.88 ± 0.40 Δzyxwvutsrqpon1.12 ± 0.24 Δzyxwv2.24 ± 0.41 Δzyxwvutsrqp1.65 ± 0.14 Δzyxwvtsr1.14 ± 0.22 Δzyxwv1.34 ± 0.03 Δzyxwvt
10.61-Octen-3-ol98298414.44 ± 0.54 gfe47.35 ± 2.22 ba48.67 ± 2.37 a41.55 ± 3.36 dc44.23 ± 0.79 c39.01 ± 0.92 d
10.93-Octanone9899900.75 ± 0.16 Δzyx1.37 ± 0.21 Δzyxwvts0.74 ± 0.06 Δzyx1.08 ± 0.02 Δzyxwv1.45 ± 0.29 Δzyxwvtsr2.05 ± 0.29 Δzyxwvutsrqp
11.0β-Myrcene9929940.35 ± 0.01 Δz0.22 ± 0.04 Δz0.36 ± 0.06 Δz0.28 ± 0.01 Δz0.22 ± 0.03 Δz0.27 ± 0.01 Δz
11.23-Octanol9959974.79 ± 0.23 yxwvutsrqponm15.19 ± 1.05 gfe8.12 ± 0.56 mlkji13.32 ± 1.65 hgf15.24 ± 0.66 gfe11.17 ± 0.64 jihg
11.5α-Phellandrene100210061.57 ± 0.22 Δzyxwvtsr0.49 ± 0.07 Δzy0.31 ± 0.10 Δz0.47 ± 0.14 Δzy0.20 ± 0.02 Δz0.23 ± 0.04 Δz
11.63-Hexen-1-ol. acetate100510101.17 ± 0.21 Δzyxwv0.04 ± 0.00 Δ0.27 ± 0.23 Δz0.02 ± 0.01 Δ0.09 ± 0.01 Δ0.10 ± 0.02 Δ
12.2p-Cymene102610290.98 ± 0.05 Δzyxw0.35 ± 0.07 Δz0.38 ± 0.07 Δz0.31 ± 0.02 Δz0.20 ± 0.02 Δz0.15 ± 0.01 Δ
12.4Limonene103210332.10 ± 0.10 Δzyxwvutsrqp0.88 ± 0.12 Δzyxw1.36 ± 0.24 Δzyxwvts1.23 ± 0.07 Δzyxwv0.74 ± 0.13 Δzyx0.97 ± 0.03 Δzyxw
12.5Eucalyptol103310360.03 ± 0.01 Δ0.03 ± 0.01 Δ0.09 ± 0.01 Δ0.04 ± 0.00 Δ0.25 ± 0.21 Δz0.07 ± 0.01 Δ
15.1-Linalool110311010.56 ± 0.13 Δzy0.73 ± 0.07 Δzyx0.67 ± 0.04 Δzy1.14 ± 0.02 Δzyxwv0.73 ± 0.03 Δzyx1.06 ± 0.02 Δzyxwv
15.3Nonanal111111060.49 ± 0.12 Δzy0.18 ± 0.06 Δz0.11 ± 0.01 Δ0.13 ± 0.04 Δ0.06 ± 0.01 Δ0.17 ± 0.09 Δ
21.9Bornyl acetate128412880.00 ± 0.00 Δ0.04 ± 0.02 Δ0.85 ± 0.82 Δzyxw0.09 ± 0.00 Δ0.43 ± 0.29 Δzy2.19 ± 0.44 Δzyxwvutsrqp
24.4Cyclosativene136813760.25 ± 0.10 Δz0.20 ± 0.03 Δz0.29 ± 0.04 Δz0.33 ± 0.01 Δz0.18 ± 0.02 Δz0.15 ± 0.01 Δ
24.7Copaene1382138318.44 ± 0.27 e5.36 ± 0.18 vutsrqponml5.68 ± 0.22 utsrqponmlk5.04 ± 0.59 xwvutsrqponml6.27 ± 0.17 qponmlk6.40 ± 0.45 ponmlk
24.8Di-epi-α-cedrene138513890.15 ± 0.02 Δ0.08 ± 0.02 Δ0.08 ± 0.01 Δ0.03 ± 0.00 Δ0.13 ± 0.03 Δ0.30 ± 0.05 Δz
25.0β-Elemene139413960.48 ± 0.20 Δzy0.34 ± 0.08 Δz0.31 ± 0.10 Δz0.68 ± 0.06 Δzyx0.86 ± 0.14 Δzyxw1.03 ± 0.07 Δzyxwv
25.5Santalene141714180.50 ± 0.17 Δzy0.36 ± 0.06 Δz0.51 ± 0.04 Δzy0.71 ± 0.10 Δzyx0.44 ± 0.05 Δzy0.39 ± 0.02 Δz
25.7Caryophyllene142414282.22 ± 0.22 Δzyxwvutsrqp0.86 ± 0.07 Δzyxw0.66 ± 0.02 Δzy0.61 ± 0.04 Δzy1.14 ± 0.03 Δzyxwv2.33 ± 0.15 Δzyxwvutsrqpo
26.2δ-Guaiene145214552.18 ± 0.95 Δzyxwvutsrqp1.54 ± 0.19 Δzyxwvtsr2.07 ± 0.13 Δzyxwvutsrqp2.89 ± 0.39 Δzyxwvutsrqpon1.67 ± 0.18 Δzyxwvtsr2.15 ± 0.08 Δzyxwvutsrqp
26.8γ-Selinene147914840.34 ± 0.01 Δz0.22 ± 0.02 Δz0.25 ± 0.02 Δz0.21 ± 0.02 Δz0.38 ± 0.06 Δz0.50 ± 0.06 Δzy
26.9β-Chamigrene177614880.38 ± 0.05 Δz0.19 ± 0.02 Δz0.14 ± 0.01 Δ1.41 ± 0.39 Δzyxwvtsr0.14 ± 0.02 Δ0.98 ± 0.11 Δzyxw
26.9Germacrene D148114911.58 ± 0.13 Δzyxwvtsr0.58 ± 0.04 Δzy0.30 ± 0.02 Δz0.33 ± 0.16 Δz0.75 ± 0.09 Δzyx1.19 ± 0.06 Δzyxwv
27.2α-Selinene149415047.76 ± 0.93 mlkji5.70 ± 0.03 usrqponmlk5.14 ± 0.37 wvutsrqponml6.67 ± 0.80 onmlk7.57 ± 0.88 mlkji9.78 ± 0.34 kjih
27.2α-Muurolene149915080.27 ± 0.06 Δz0.40 ± 0.16 Δz0.34 ± 0.15 Δz0.49 ± 0.15 Δzy0.41 ± 0.11 Δz0.10 ± 0.01 Δ
27.5γ i δ-Cadinene151315255.51 ± 2.19 uqponm2.55 ± 0.91 Δzyxwvutsrq2.08 ± 0.79 Δzyxwvtsr2.07 ± 0.74 Δzyxwvtsr2.51 ± 0.93 Δzyxwvutsrq2.93 ± 1.11 Δzyxwvutsrqpo
15241534
Values after which there is a different letter are significantly different (p > 0.05, according to the Tukey test).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jakobina, M.; Łyczko, J.; Szumny, A.; Galek, R. Plant In Vitro Cultures of Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. “Electric Lime” and Possibilities of Modification in the Biosynthesis of Volatile Compounds. Molecules 2024, 29, 2193. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules29102193

AMA Style

Jakobina M, Łyczko J, Szumny A, Galek R. Plant In Vitro Cultures of Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. “Electric Lime” and Possibilities of Modification in the Biosynthesis of Volatile Compounds. Molecules. 2024; 29(10):2193. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules29102193

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jakobina, Maciej, Jacek Łyczko, Antoni Szumny, and Renata Galek. 2024. "Plant In Vitro Cultures of Coleus scutellarioides (L.) Benth. “Electric Lime” and Possibilities of Modification in the Biosynthesis of Volatile Compounds" Molecules 29, no. 10: 2193. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules29102193

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop